Creativity Vs. Ethics in GM’s 2007 Advertisement Controversy

Introduction

Commercial advertising for car dealerships often conjures images of families perusing showrooms, engaging with enthusiastic salespeople eager to present enticing deals. However, in 2007, General Motors (GM) ventured into uncharted territory by releasing an advertisement that diverged significantly from this conventional narrative. This ad, which aired during the highly anticipated Super Bowl XLI, featured a yellow car factory robot facing an emotional and existential crisis after dropping a bolt, leading to its layoff. The controversial ad aimed to highlight GM's commitment to quality, yet it was met with substantial backlash due to its depiction of suicide, sparking a debate on the ethical boundaries of advertising.

The Advertisement's Controversial Narrative

The commercial opens with a bustling assembly line where robots and employees collaboratively construct new vehicles. A pivotal moment occurs when a yellow car factory robot accidentally drops a bolt, triggering a siren and halting production. The ensuing scene depicts disappointment among the human employees, culminating in the robot's layoff. As the narrative unfolds, viewers witness the robot's struggle to adapt to life outside the factory, attempting various jobs while grappling with feelings of sadness and worthlessness. The melancholy tone is underscored by Eric Carmen's iconic song, "All By Myself," which amplifies the robot's sense of isolation.

The robot's journey reaches a dramatic climax when it dreams of jumping off a bridge, only to awaken back in the factory, gasping as if it had been holding its breath. The ad concludes with the message, "The GM 100,000 Mile Warranty, it’s got everyone at GM obsessed with quality." While the intent was to emphasize GM's dedication to exceptional vehicle quality, the portrayal of suicide sparked controversy and criticism.

Ethical Concerns and Public Backlash

General Motors' advertisement, intended to appeal emotionally to its audience, inadvertently raised ethical concerns. The American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP) criticized the ad, asserting that it conveyed "dangerous and insensitive messages." The depiction of suicide, even in a dream sequence, was seen as trivializing a serious issue that affects countless individuals and families. AFSP warned that the ad might encourage vulnerable individuals to consider suicide as a solution to their problems, highlighting the potential for "suicide contagion," where sensationalized portrayals can lead to copycat incidents.

This backlash was not limited to advocacy groups; thousands of negative comments inundated YouTube, reflecting widespread public disapproval. Robert Gebbia, the executive director of AFSP, emphasized that using depression and suicide to sell cars was inappropriate and insensitive. The controversy prompted GM to meet with the foundation and subsequently edit the commercial to remove the suicide reference, airing the revised version during the Grammy Awards.

Emotional Appeals and Audience Reception

The advertisement's use of emotional appeals was intended to resonate with viewers, yet it inadvertently highlighted the fine line between effective marketing and insensitivity. The choice of Eric Carmen's "All By Myself" as a soundtrack was a deliberate attempt to evoke empathy and connection with the robot's plight. However, the emotional depth achieved was overshadowed by the negative reception to the portrayal of suicide.

Interestingly, GM's vice president of sales, services, and marketing, Mark LaNeeve, stated that the ad had been screened by focus groups for insensitivity. These groups reportedly found the advertisement amusing and effective in conveying GM's message about their dedication to quality. This discrepancy between focus group results and public reaction underscores the challenges advertisers face in predicting audience responses, especially when addressing sensitive topics.

Conclusion

General Motors' 2007 advertisement serves as a poignant case study in the complexities of advertising ethics and audience engagement. While the company aimed to creatively showcase its commitment to quality, the controversial depiction of suicide overshadowed this objective, resulting in widespread backlash. The subsequent decision to edit the ad demonstrated GM's willingness to address public concerns, albeit after the initial damage was done.

This incident underscores the importance of sensitivity and responsibility in advertising, particularly when addressing emotionally charged themes. Advertisers must consider not only the message they wish to convey but also the potential impact on diverse audiences. By learning from such experiences, companies can navigate the delicate balance between creativity and ethical responsibility, ultimately crafting campaigns that resonate positively with the public.

Did you like this example?

293

12