Democratic Systems Evolution

Alexis de Tocqueville’s seminal work, Democracy in America, delves deeply into the intricacies of the United States as an advanced democracy, exploring both its merits and potential pitfalls. In this essay, I will argue that De Tocqueville's insights are not only persuasive but also essential for understanding the inevitable expansion of democratic ideals. This understanding is vital for preparing humanity for a new political era and establishing a framework of security within emerging political structures. De Tocqueville’s journey to America inspired him to scrutinize democracy closely.

Although he was personally skeptical of the concept, he recognized its burgeoning influence and its potential to reshape global political landscapes. He identified the deficiencies in the French revolutions and examined what America had achieved or failed to achieve in crafting a sustainable democracy. His observations offer valuable lessons for constructing a French democracy resilient against collapse.

Equality as a Fundamental Principle

During his visit to America, De Tocqueville identified the "equality of conditions" as the cornerstone of American democratic life, describing it as a "fundamental fact" that pervades every aspect of society, from opinions and traditions to politics and law. He noted, "I readily discovered the prodigious influence which this [equality of conditions] primary fact exercises on the whole course of society…" (De Tocqueville, p. 398). This pervasive force of equality, according to De Tocqueville, is the driving factor behind America's democratic success and resilience. He observed that American democracy was in its "most developed state" and showed no signs of decline. In his view, democracy, or "equality," is an unstoppable and, for some, an irresistible force that every individual, knowingly or unknowingly, contributes to its rise and triumph worldwide.

De Tocqueville also contextualizes his discussion of equality within the broader Christian world, referencing revolutions in countries like France and significant historical events such as the Crusades. He introduces the idea of divine determinism, suggesting that humans are "blind instruments in the hands of God" (De Tocqueville, p. 400). According to De Tocqueville, democracy's spread is divinely ordained, destined to permeate all of human civilization. This deterministic view implies that, regardless of personal beliefs or actions, the progression towards democracy is inexorable.

Potential Pitfalls of Democracy

Despite recognizing democracy's inevitable spread, De Tocqueville does not shy away from highlighting its potential dangers. He explores issues such as establishing equality in the political realm, moral authority, and the threat of tyrannical rule. De Tocqueville asserts, “To conceive of men remaining forever unequal upon to a single point, yet equal on all others, is impossible; they must come in the end to be equal upon all” (De Tocqueville, p. 411). He presents two methods of achieving political equality: either granting everyone the same rights or stripping rights away entirely. He leaves this choice to society, acknowledging the human heart's passion and "taste for equality" (De Tocqueville, p. 411).

One of the significant paradoxes De Tocqueville raises is the tension between individual freedom and majority rule. He posits, “…, the people have a right to do anything; and yet I have asserted that all authority originate in the will of the majority” (De Tocqueville, p. 413). This paradox questions why individuals, given equal rights and freedoms, would allow the majority to dictate their choices. De Tocqueville introduces the concept of "soft despotism," a form of tyranny masked by the illusion of popular control. He warns that this could lurk within democracy, hidden in majority rule, with citizens unaware of its encroachment. He argues that unchecked power is inherently dangerous and that humans are ill-equipped to wield it responsibly. “I am not much alarmed at the excessive liberty which reigns in that country [America], as at the inadequate securities which one finds there against tyranny” (De Tocqueville, p. 415). For De Tocqueville, it is not equality itself that poses a threat but rather the absence of safeguards against "soft despotism" infiltrating the majority.

The Role of Determinism and Religion

De Tocqueville's argument for the inevitable spread of democracy is intertwined with his belief in divine determinism. He suggests that humans are unwittingly under God's control, and regardless of one's stance on democracy, whether supportive or oppositional, it is irrelevant. He asserts, “It is not necessary that God himself should speak in order that we may discover the unquestionable signs of his will” (De Tocqueville, p. 401). Relying on his observations in America and “the habitual course of nature and the constant tendency of events” (De Tocqueville, p. 401), De Tocqueville implies that history's failures, such as the French revolutions, underscore his belief in the inevitability of democracy. However, this claim lacks empirical support, as it primarily rests on his deterministic worldview. From a non-religious perspective, the idea of being "blind instruments in the hands of God" can be unsettling, suggesting a lack of free will and autonomy.

Determinism, as presented by De Tocqueville, posits that all aspects of life, including events, moral values, and relationships, are predetermined by existing causes. This perspective challenges the notion of free will in a democratic society, where individuals are ostensibly empowered to make choices. The contradiction between his deterministic views and the democratic ideals of freedom and choice is apparent. De Tocqueville's religious assertions seem to undermine the very essence of democracy he seeks to critique and improve.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America serves as a complex examination of democracy, highlighting both its potential benefits and inherent risks. While De Tocqueville was not an advocate for democracy, he acknowledged its inevitable rise and sought to critique and refine its implementation to prevent future failures. His observations provide valuable insights into the dynamics of equality, majority rule, and the dangers of "soft despotism." Although his deterministic and religious perspectives may seem contradictory to democratic ideals, they underscore the inevitability of democracy's expansion. De Tocqueville's work challenges societies to confront these paradoxes and prepare for the "new science of politics" necessary for a changing world (De Tocqueville, p. 401). Ultimately, his analysis remains a critical resource for understanding the complexities of democratic life and serves as a foundation for shaping more resilient democratic systems.

Did you like this example?

778

32