Emma Watson at the UN: Rhetoric for Universal Gender Equality
On September 20, 2014, Emma Watson delivered a groundbreaking speech at the United Nations headquarters titled "United Nations Address on Gender Equality." As an accomplished actress and newly appointed Goodwill Ambassador for the UN, Watson took on the crucial task of advocating for gender equality—emphasizing that it is an issue affecting not just women but both genders. Her objective was to persuade her audience, which included some of the most influential leaders worldwide, that entrenched gender stereotypes harm everyone and that recognizing equality is a shared responsibility.
To achieve this, Watson employs a variety of rhetorical strategies, such as logos, parenthesis, and anaphora, to engage her audience on both intellectual and emotional levels. This essay explores how Watson's use of these strategies effectively conveys the message that gender equality is a universal issue.
The Power of Logic
Watson's speech is steeped in logical reasoning, or logos, which is a deliberate choice given her audience. At the time, the majority of those in positions of power were men who often relied on logic and empirical evidence to form opinions and drive change. Watson strategically addresses this by presenting compelling evidence that both men and women suffer from societal stereotypes. For instance, she remarks, "I've seen my father's role as a parent being valued less by society despite my needing his presence as a child as much as my mother's." This statement is not merely anecdotal; it challenges the conventional norms that undervalue the role of men in parenting. By addressing fathers directly, Watson appeals to the men in her audience, urging them to reconsider how societal pressures might have limited their own familial roles. Another poignant example is when Watson states, "We don't often talk about men being imprisoned by gender stereotypes, but I can see that they are, and that when they are free, things will change for women as a natural consequence." This logic disrupts the outdated stereotype that men are inherently stronger or smarter, which inadvertently perpetuates gender inequality.
Breaking Down Stereotypes
In addition to logos, Watson uses parenthesis to add depth and layers to her argument. Parenthesis allows her to insert critical facts and observations that fortify her main points. For instance, she mentions, "I've seen young men suffering from mental illness, unable to ask for help for fear it would make them less of a man—In fact, in the UK, suicide is the biggest killer of men— eclipsing road accidents." By embedding these statistics, Watson not only highlights the gravity of mental health issues among men but also underscores how gender stereotypes contribute to these crises. This tactic effectively dismantles the notion that men must always be stoic and emotionally resilient, thus advocating for a more supportive environment where men can seek help without stigma.
The Impact of Repetition
Anaphora, the deliberate repetition of phrases, is another technique used by Watson to drive her message home. By repeating phrases like "when I was eight,... when at 14... when at 15... when at 18," she draws attention to how gender inequality manifests at different life stages. Each repetition emphasizes the persistent and evolving nature of gender biases. For example, she notes, "when at 18 my male friends were unable to express their feelings," linking back to the overarching issue of gender norms that stifle emotional expression in men. Through anaphora, Watson reinforces the urgency of addressing these stereotypes early and consistently, illustrating that gender equality is not just a women's issue but a societal one.
Personal Experience and Empathy
Throughout her speech, Watson anchors her arguments in personal experiences, using anaphora to create a rhythm and emphasis that resonates with her audience. Statements like "I've seen my father's... I've seen young men... I've seen men... Men don't have the benefits of equality either" serve to humanize the broader issue of gender inequality. By sharing her observations empathetically, Watson connects on a personal level, illustrating that gender stereotypes are not abstract concepts but real barriers that affect everyday lives. This personal touch adds authenticity and relatability to her message, encouraging her audience to reflect on their own experiences and biases.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Emma Watson's speech at the United Nations stands as a powerful call to action for gender equality. Through her strategic use of logos, parenthesis, and anaphora, she effectively communicates that both men and women are shackled by damaging stereotypes. While she adeptly highlights the interconnectedness of gender equality issues, there are areas where further exploration could enhance the impact of her message. Nevertheless, Watson's speech lays a solid foundation for ongoing dialogue, urging all genders to unite in the pursuit of equality. By addressing the audience's logic, emotions, and personal experiences, Watson not only advocates for change but also inspires hope that a more equitable world is possible.
Cite this page
Emma Watson at the UN: Rhetoric for Universal Gender Equality. (2021, Feb 24). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/rhetorical-analysis-on-united-nations-address-on-gender-equality/