Why Voting should be Mandatory: Strengthening Democracy

Introduction

Voting is the cornerstone of democracy. It is the mechanism through which citizens express their political will, choose their representatives, and influence the direction of their country. Yet in many democratic nations, voter turnout is declining, and civic engagement is weakening. In response, a growing number of political scientists and policy makers argue that voting should be mandatory. Compulsory voting, they claim, enhances democratic legitimacy, promotes civic responsibility, and ensures that government reflects the will of all people — not just the most motivated or privileged.

This essay defends the position that voting should be mandatory in democratic societies and explores its benefits, ethical justification, and potential challenges.

Enhancing Democratic Legitimacy

One of the most compelling reasons to make voting mandatory is that it strengthens the legitimacy of democratic institutions. In countries with low voter turnout, elected leaders may not truly represent the broader population. For example, if only 55% of eligible voters cast a ballot, then the winning candidate may only have the support of 30% of the population. This undermines the democratic ideal of majority rule and leaves large segments of society unrepresented.

Mandatory voting ensures broader participation across socioeconomic, ethnic, and ideological lines. When all citizens are required to vote, the electorate becomes more diverse and representative. Policies are then shaped by the preferences of the entire population — not just by the voices of the wealthiest, most educated, or most politically active citizens. As a result, the government is more accountable and better aligned with the public good.

Promoting Civic Duty and Political Awareness

Democracy is not just a system of rights — it is also a system of responsibilities. Just as citizens are required to pay taxes, serve on juries, or obey the law, they should also be required to vote. Mandatory voting reinforces the idea that participation is a civic duty, not merely an option. When people are obligated to vote, they are more likely to become informed about candidates, policies, and current events. This leads to a more politically educated public and a healthier democratic culture.

In countries with compulsory voting, such as Australia and Belgium, research shows that citizens are more engaged in political discussions and more aware of national issues. The act of voting itself encourages reflection, dialogue, and learning. While some critics argue that forcing people to vote leads to uninformed choices, the evidence suggests the opposite: participation stimulates awareness, and awareness leads to better choices.

Reducing Inequality and Voter Suppression

Another key benefit of mandatory voting is its role in reducing inequality. In voluntary voting systems, turnout is typically higher among older, wealthier, and more educated populations. Marginalized groups — including the poor, young people, and ethnic minorities — often vote at much lower rates. This creates a distorted political landscape where certain interests are consistently overrepresented, and others are ignored.

Mandatory voting helps level the playing field. When everyone is required to vote, the influence of elite groups diminishes, and underrepresented voices gain strength. Politicians are then incentivized to campaign across all communities, not just those most likely to vote. This results in more inclusive policies, broader representation, and a stronger commitment to social justice.

Additionally, in countries like the United States, where voter suppression remains a serious issue, compulsory voting could counteract efforts to discourage or limit participation. If voting were mandatory, governments would be required to ensure that all citizens have easy access to the ballot — through registration assistance, early voting, absentee options, and accommodations for people with disabilities.

Addressing the Criticisms

Despite its advantages, mandatory voting is not without criticism. Opponents argue that forcing people to vote violates individual freedom and that participation should be voluntary. However, most democracies already impose certain civic duties for the greater good. Jury duty, for example, is compulsory in many countries, even though some citizens may find it inconvenient or disagree with the judicial system. Voting, likewise, is a minimal burden with profound

Did you like this example?

247

10