Gender Politics in Shakespeare’s “Shrew”

Equality, fundamentally defined as granting individuals the same rights, opportunities, and responsibilities regardless of race, gender, social class, or religious beliefs, forms the cornerstone of contemporary social justice movements. This principle is vividly brought to life in the University of Louisville’s production of Shakespeare's "The Taming of the Shrew," directed by J. Ariadne Calvano with dramaturgical insights from Janna Segal. Their production emphasizes a modern interpretation of feminism, a movement advocating for women's economic, political, and social equality with men.

This essay delves into how this production communicates feminist themes through innovative scenic transitions, stage design, and costume choices, ultimately elevating the play's message on gender equality.

The Modern Context and Scenic Design

The production begins with a contemporary twist, setting the induction scene in a 2018 bar where Christopher Sly, inebriated, is deceived by reporters Matt and Josh into believing he is part of a rally in Padua, Italy. This clever use of modern context sets a relatable stage for the audience, allowing them to connect more deeply with the narrative. As the scene transitions to 1963, the scenic design ingeniously shifts using curtains adorned with yellow flowers, a neutral brown pattern, and vintage red leather sofas. This transformation is not merely aesthetic but symbolic, reflecting a period when feminism was gaining momentum, highlighted by the presence of Betty Friedan’s seminal work, "The Feminine Mystique." This book, representative of the feminist wave of the 1960s, serves as a thematic anchor, reinforcing the play's exploration of gender roles and equality.

The choice of setting in the 1960s, a pivotal decade for feminist activism, underscores the production's commitment to adapting Shakespearean literature to modern sensibilities. It draws attention to the evolving role of women in society and literature, challenging the traditional depiction of women in Elizabethan times as passive and subservient. By casting predominantly women in a play historically performed by men, the production celebrates the progress of feminism and the empowerment of women in contemporary theater.

Stage Design as Symbolism

The stage design further amplifies the play’s feminist themes through strategic use of ground elevations. The set designer employs varied elevations to create visual interest and convey deeper social commentary. For instance, the central platform, lowered by 12 inches compared to the elevated sides, resembles a trophy pedestal, emphasizing the focal point of the scene. This intentional design choice not only enhances visual appeal but also symbolizes the economic hierarchy and social stratification of the characters, such as Lucentio, the wealthy student, and the upper-class maidens Bianca and Katherine.

By highlighting these social dynamics, the stage design subtly critiques the rigid class structures of the past, advocating for a more egalitarian society. This nuanced approach encourages the audience to reflect on the diversity and complexity of human experiences, aligning with the production's overarching message of equality and inclusion. The decision to stage the play in The Playhouse, a space traditionally associated with Shakespearean productions, further bridges the gap between classical and contemporary theater, reminding audiences of the timeless relevance of Shakespeare's themes.

Costumes and the Fluidity of Identity

Costuming in the production plays a crucial role in reinforcing the themes of identity and transformation. The use of acrylic fabric, popular in the 1960s for its affordability and resemblance to wool, adds authenticity to the period setting. Petruchio’s flamboyant red acrylic suit, worn during his wedding, serves as a visual metaphor for the superficiality of appearances. His attire, reminiscent of a clown, initially draws negative attention from Kate, yet it underscores the power dynamics at play. Petruchio’s declaration that Kate is marrying him, not his clothes, alludes to the fluidity of identity and the performative nature of societal roles.

This focus on appearance versus reality invites the audience to question the constructs of identity and the societal expectations placed on individuals based on gender. The production challenges the notion that outward appearances define one's worth, advocating for a deeper understanding of personal identity beyond external trappings. This aligns with feminist ideals of self-empowerment and authenticity, encouraging women to embrace their true selves rather than conforming to prescribed roles.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the University of Louisville's production of "The Taming of the Shrew" offers a profound exploration of feminism and equality through its innovative use of scenic design, stage dynamics, and costume choices. By setting the play in a modern context and emphasizing the feminist wave of the 1960s, the production highlights the ongoing struggle for gender equality and the importance of challenging traditional narratives. The strategic stage design and costumes further enrich the narrative, inviting audiences to reflect on the complexities of identity and the fluidity of societal roles. Ultimately, this production not only entertains but also educates, offering a compelling commentary on the evolving nature of gender dynamics and the enduring relevance of feminist principles in contemporary society.

Did you like this example?

545

29