McCarthyism in the Crucible

A powerful dramatization of the Salem Witch Trials, Arthur Miller's "The Crucible" vividly brings history to life. However, a closer examination reveals that Miller took significant artistic liberties, deviating from historical accuracy to enhance the play's dramatic impact and underline its thematic concerns. These deviations are not indicative of storytelling flaws or laziness, but rather deliberate choices made by Miller to explore the overarching theme of mass hysteria's ability to corrupt individual conscience and obstruct justice. This essay seeks to explore these artistic choices, focusing on the characterizations of Abigail Williams and John Proctor, and examining how the play serves as an allegory for McCarthyism.

Abigail Williams: More Than an Antagonist

Abigail Williams is often confined to the role of a mere antagonist in The Crucible, but her character is a profound exploration of how hysteria can corrupt one's conscience. Miller's decision to increase Abigail's age from the historically accurate 11 to 17 is significant. This alteration invites the audience to view her not as a child but as a young adult capable of making moral decisions. At 17, Abigail possesses the potential for self-awareness and moral reasoning, albeit twisted. Initially, she attempts to conceal the witchcraft activities, showing a semblance of conscience. Yet, as hysteria escalates, she faces the brutal choice of accusing others or facing accusations herself. Her infamous cry, "I saw Goody Osburn with the Devil! I saw Bridget Bishop with the Devil!" (Miller 45), marks the point where she succumbs to hysteria, relinquishing her moral compass. Abigail's transformation is further illustrated when she accuses Mary Warren of conjuring a bird, acting as though "hypnotized" (Miller 107). This moment signifies her complete absorption into the hysteria she helped unleash. Her age becomes crucial as it positions her as an individual who should possess a conscience but instead becomes a victim of her own machinations. The monster of lies she creates eventually traps her within its psychological confines, stripping her of authentic self-awareness.

John Proctor: The Everyman

John Proctor, as a character, is strategically designed to oppose the hysteria of the Salem Witch Trials, embodying the play's themes of conscience and justice. Miller's decision to portray Proctor as a farmer, rather than the historically accurate tavern keeper, is pivotal. This alteration transforms Proctor from a potentially wealthy insider to a relatable everyman, aligning him with the audience. As a farmer, Proctor is depicted as pragmatic and grounded, standing in stark contrast to the town's power figures like Parris and Danforth. This characterization elevates Proctor to a symbol of the underdog, inviting the audience's empathy and support.

Proctor's struggle against Parris and Danforth transcends a mere personal conflict, evolving into a broader battle between independent conscience and societal hysteria. Miller's fabrication of Proctor's confession proceedings heightens the dramatic tension and solidifies Proctor's role as the play's moral center. Historically, Proctor never confessed, yet in the play, he does, only to retract when asked to sign his confession. His refusal, articulated in the poignant line, "How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name!" (Miller 133), underscores the importance of personal integrity and identity. This moment reveals the corrosive effect of hysteria on Proctor's conscience and identity, culminating in his final act of defiance that cements him as the protagonist.

The Crucible as an Allegory for McCarthyism

Miller's The Crucible is not just a historical narrative but an allegory for McCarthyism, a period marked by the U.S. government's fervent pursuit of alleged Communists under Senator McCarthy. The play mirrors the witch trials' mania, reflecting how such hysteria forces individuals to choose between their moral conscience and self-preservation. Abigail and Proctor exemplify the consequences of these choices, illustrating that in times of mass hysteria, there is no simple escape. Abigail's descent into hysteria and Proctor's steadfast adherence to his conscience highlight the play's central message: hysteria corrupts, turning words into weapons and innocence into guilt.

The allegorical nature of The Crucible remains relevant in contemporary politics, where accusatory discourse often overshadows rationality and conscience. By revisiting Miller's work, audiences are reminded of hysteria's destructive potential and the necessity of safeguarding individual integrity.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Arthur Miller's The Crucible employs historical deviation not as a flaw but as a tool to underscore the timeless themes of hysteria and conscience. Through the intricate portrayals of Abigail Williams and John Proctor, Miller crafts a narrative that transcends its historical setting to comment on the universal human experience. Furthermore, as an allegory for McCarthyism, the play serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of mass hysteria, reminding us of the importance of maintaining our moral compass in the face of societal pressures. Miller's artistic liberties invite us to reflect on the complexities of human nature and the enduring struggle between conscience and conformity.

Did you like this example?

1777

74