Self Analysis Example

Three psychological lenses focus on my personality's prism, revealing different facets of self-understanding. The first approach to my personality I will be using is the Psychoanalytic Approach, specifically looking at Neo-Freudian Erik Erikson’s Eight Stages of Development theory. The second approach I will be using is the Biological Approach, focusing on the concept of sensitivity to stimulation. Finally, the last approach I have chosen to apply to my personality analysis is the Trait Approach, particularly examining optimism and pessimism.

A comprehensive understanding of personality requires a multifaceted approach.

Erik Erikson’s theory offers a framework where personality development extends from infancy to old age. This development is marked by eight critical stages, each characterized by a specific crisis that must be resolved. How individuals navigate these crises significantly impacts their personality and their approach to future challenges. As I am only twenty years old, I have traversed five of these stages, and I will reflect on how I might address the remaining stages in the future.

In Erikson’s first stage, basic trust vs. mistrust, infants develop trust when their needs are consistently met with love and care. As a child, despite being the middle sibling, I received ample attention and care from both my parents and older sister. This nurturing environment helped me establish a foundational sense of trust, which has carried into my adult relationships.

The second stage, autonomy vs. shame and doubt, spans from eighteen months to three years. During this stage, children begin to assert their independence. I was fortunate to experience a sense of autonomy, as I was encouraged to make my own choices, such as selecting my toys and dressing myself. This autonomy has fostered a strong sense of self-reliance in my adult life.

The initiative vs. guilt stage, occurring between ages three and five, involves children taking initiative in social interactions. Although I participated in social activities, I often relied on others to initiate them. This tendency has persisted into adulthood, where I engage socially but seldom take the lead.

The fourth stage, industry vs. inferiority, spans from five to twelve years of age. Success in school or extracurricular activities fosters a sense of industry. My participation in school and swimming, coupled with supportive feedback from family and friends, helped me develop a sense of industry and confidence in my abilities.

The fifth stage, identity vs. role confusion, marks adolescence. Developing a strong sense of identity involves solidifying personal values and beliefs. My exploration of religious beliefs during high school led to role confusion, particularly due to social pressures. However, I have since embraced my non-religious views and clarified my career aspirations, moving towards identity formation.

Currently, I am navigating the sixth stage, intimacy vs. isolation, which involves forming meaningful relationships. Despite a past relationship ending in betrayal, I have maintained friendships and continue to seek fulfilling connections, indicating a propensity for intimacy rather than isolation.

Looking ahead, the seventh stage, generativity vs. stagnation, typically occurs in middle adulthood. While I do not plan to have children, I anticipate contributing to the next generation by being an active and supportive aunt, thereby achieving generativity.

The final stage, ego integrity vs. despair, involves reflecting on one's life with satisfaction or regret. I aspire to live a life characterized by continuous growth and learning, aiming to reach old age with a sense of integrity rather than despair.

Transitioning to the Biological Approach, the concept of sensitivity to stimulation examines personality through the lens of introversion and extraversion. Extraverts seek stimulating environments to elevate their cortical arousal, while introverts prefer less stimulation. I find myself between these extremes, enjoying social interactions yet requiring solitude to recharge. This balance suggests a nuanced personality not easily classified as strictly introverted or extraverted.

Finally, using the Trait Approach, specifically the optimism and pessimism spectrum, I identify as an optimist. My tendency to maintain a positive outlook, set ambitious goals, and adapt to setbacks reflects a disposition towards optimism. I embrace opportunities and view challenges as growth experiences, which aligns with the characteristics of an optimistic personality.

In conclusion, the application of Erikson’s psychosocial stages, the Biological Approach, and the Trait Approach provides a comprehensive understanding of my personality. These frameworks reveal a complex interplay between developmental experiences, biological predispositions, and personal outlook, highlighting the multifaceted nature of personality. By examining these aspects, I gain valuable insights into my growth and the ways I navigate life’s challenges.

Did you like this example?

1241

65