Marxism is the Arrangement of Communism

Karl Max is a German philosopher and socialist. He work has everlastingly affected the field of human science in that his perspectives opened the way to the investigation of how one’s social class impacts one’s beneficial encounters and life shots. His work additionally opened the entryway for some contrasting points of view on the issue of the well off and the poor in the public eye. Karl is the man behind the theory Marxism. Marxism is the focus on social and political theory explains economic class struggles. “a theory in which class struggle is a central element in the analysis of social change in Western societies.” Marxism is the antithesis of capitalism which is defined by Encarta as “an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and distribution of goods, characterized by a free competitive market and motivation by profit.” Marxism is the arrangement of communism of which the overwhelming element is open responsibility for methods for generation, conveyance, and trade. Marxism focus in his theory is social class. Essentially, Marx implied that on the off chance that one is in the high society, life was one of relaxation and wealth, while those in the lower class led lives of hardship and neediness. I feel like is theory is beneficial to both side because at first thing was only green on the wealthy side. Even tho is under communism Karl believed that justice to human rights for men and women.

I agree strongly on this because as a woman I can under how women can be treated differently. Also giving equal right to both shows that he cares about the society as a whole and not as separated groups. One of the biggest things Marxism helps with is society having fewer changes to going into debt because that was a big problem the communities was facing. When you look in to Social Contract Theory is based on individuals live respectively in the public arena as per an understanding that builds up moral and political principles of conduct. A few people trust that if we live as indicated by a social contract, we can live ethically by our particular decision and not on the grounds that a heavenly being requires it. Social contract hypothesis is utilized to legitimize present day governments’ utilization of brutality against their residents. The contention guarantees that every individual has surrendered most or the greater part of their rights by verifiably consenting to the “social contract”. These two theory’s are interesting but I feel that Marxism is a better theory, political structure because is cause a better system that support everyone equally from poor to rich and help with going in debt. Another theory that does hand in hand with This is Rawls’ notion of “justice as fairness. It is very similar to Marxism because they have the same idea for liberty and equality, both show’s everyone should have the same options. Another issue is whether violence should be advocated or justified by political ideology. I think that violence should be justified by political ideology because it is an issues that isn’t usage looked upon but needed to because they give people a different view on violence.

Did you like this example?