Islam and the West Intercultural Altercation and Compatibility
In this paper, I will address one of the trivial matters faced by the analysts in terms of relations between the Islamic worlds and the West: How would we be able to talk about profoundly disruptive social and political issues in manners that cultivate struggle change as a substitute of an escalation of strife? Utilizing story examination as a methodology, we look at the most widely recognized “”stories”” that performing artists relating to Islam and the West use to sort out their reasoning about clash: an account of intercultural showdown and an account of intercultural similarity. In the wake of taking note of that both Western and Muslim storytellers of these accounts make various strikingly comparable claims, we finish up by recommending that “”another story”” underlining intercultural complementarily can help specialists of contention change reframe contrasts and advance the reason for quiet concurrence.
It has turned out to be ordinary to see that the Islamic world and the West show up to be buried in an increasing cycle of political and social clash, and that the most huge wellspring of contention is the significantly disrupted nature of American relations with the Muslim Middle East. In issues identified with Persian Gulf geopolitics, Israeli Palestinian strife, and the governmental issues of Islamic revivalism, American strategy inclinations for keeping up security and control through an arrangement of provincial coalitions are met with opposite provincial inclinations for emotional change. Contacts created by clashing interests and wants overflow into the social area, bringing about the politicization of characters and an escalatory strife dynamic in which the essential esteem duties, convictions and mores of the “”other”” are viewed as undermining and hazardous. The outcome is a climate of uncertainty, doubt, and lack of respect in which endeavors to command and force enemies dislodge activities to work together in a look for intercultural comprehension and methods for common political convenience. On the two sides of the beset connection among Americans and the Muslim Middle East, there is profound irritation and a developing faith in the uselessness of correspondence.
The present investigation adopts a reluctantly planned strategy to relations among Islam and the West, and is less worried about clarifying “”how we arrived”” than with investigating “”where we may go straightaway.”” Rather than tons of speaking to social and religious factors, this paper underestimates it that social accounts are 1) critical, and 2) pluralistic. All the while perceiving the essentialness and pluralism of social accounts about clash enables us to settle with the constitutive effect of character and profoundly inserted implications, without adding to perilous generalizations that abandon dormant potential outcomes for strife change.
To abstain from getting to be “”caught inside a story,”” we should basically inspect the substance and roots of these polarizing accounts, while likewise examining non-prevailing counter narratives of intercultural similarity and complementarily. The presence of momentous culturally diverse parallels between various stories signals both threat and opportunity. Parallel subjects of lasting encounter and competition recommend that further heightening of contention remains a honest to goodness plausibility, yet counter-stories concerning intercultural similarity and even esteem complementarily offer seek after made strides relations.