House Taken over by Julio Cortaza

Introduction

Julio Cortázar’s “House Taken Over” is more than just a Gothic short story; it is a complex tapestry woven with threads of political dissent and personal introspection. Set against the backdrop of 1940s Argentina, a period marked by the rise of Peronism and significant social upheaval, Cortázar’s narrative serves as both a critique of the political landscape and a reflection of his internal struggles with identity. This essay will explore how Cortázar’s dissatisfaction with the socio-political changes in Argentina and his personal experiences, particularly related to his sexuality, find expression in his work.

By examining the political context and psychological dimensions of “House Taken Over,” we can better understand how Cortázar used literature as a means of both political commentary and personal therapy.

Political Context

The rise of Peronism in the 1940s brought about a seismic shift in the Argentine socio-political landscape. As Levinson notes, this era witnessed the politicization of the working class and the destabilization of the bourgeoisie (103). For Cortázar, who was critical of Peronist policies, the changing dynamics of power and class were unsettling. In “House Taken Over,” the gradual encroachment of an unknown entity into the siblings’ home can be seen as a metaphor for the encroachment of Peronist ideology into the lives of the Argentine middle class. The house, inherited from their family, symbolizes the inherited wealth and stability of the bourgeoisie, now under threat from external forces.

This narrative can be interpreted as an allegory for Cortázar’s critique of how Peronism disrupted the traditional social order. The story’s unsettling atmosphere reflects his apprehension about the loss of cultural and economic stability. By using the motif of an invader taking over a familial space, Cortázar comments on how political forces can intrude upon and destabilize established societal norms. This intrusion mirrors the real-world political upheaval that Cortázar witnessed, providing him with an outlet to express his discontent through fiction.

Psychological Perspective

Beyond the political, “House Taken Over” also offers insights into Cortázar’s personal struggles, particularly his suppressed feelings regarding his bisexuality. During the 1940s, societal attitudes towards homosexuality were deeply prejudiced, often associating it with “moral insanity” (Boyer 92). This stigma likely compelled Cortázar to conceal his true identity, using literature as a covert means of self-expression and therapy.

Cortázar’s decision to channel his emotions into his writing can be seen as a form of psychotherapy. The story’s ambiguous and unsettling nature mirrors the internal conflict he may have experienced. The mysterious presence that gradually takes over the house could symbolize the societal pressures that forced him to suppress his identity. Turner’s analysis further supports this view, suggesting that Cortázar’s work often challenges taboos and reflects his desire to break free from restrictive societal norms (Turner 44).

By embedding themes of transgression and taboo within his narrative, Cortázar not only critiques societal norms but also navigates his own complex identity. The uncanny relationship between the brother and sister in the story may serve as a metaphor for the unnatural constraints imposed on his personal life by societal expectations. This layer of psychological complexity adds depth to the narrative, revealing how Cortázar’s work serves as a therapeutic medium to reconcile his public and private selves.

Connecting the Political and Psychological

The interplay between the political and psychological themes in “House Taken Over” creates a multifaceted narrative that defies singular interpretation. Cortázar’s dissatisfaction with Peronism and his personal struggles with identity are not isolated issues; they intersect and influence each other. The political climate of the time likely exacerbated his feelings of alienation, compelling him to address both in his writing. By intertwining these themes, Cortázar crafts a story that resonates on multiple levels, allowing readers to explore the broader societal implications of personal and political discontent.

Conclusion

In “House Taken Over,” Julio Cortázar masterfully weaves a narrative that critiques the political upheaval of 1940s Argentina while simultaneously exploring deeply personal themes. The story serves as a testament to Cortázar’s ability to use literature as a vehicle for both political commentary and personal catharsis. While the socio-political landscape of Argentina has evolved since Cortázar’s time, the themes of his work remain relevant today as society continues to grapple with issues of identity and political division.

Cortázar’s literary legacy endures, offering a lens through which to examine the complexities of human experience. His work encourages readers to reflect on the ways in which political forces and personal identity intersect, challenging us to confront the societal norms that shape our lives. As society progresses towards greater acceptance and understanding, Cortázar’s narrative serves as a reminder of the power of literature to inspire change and foster empathy.

Did you like this example?

1002

42