Gender Representation Impact in Modern Advertising

In the study of sexism in advertising over the years, researchers have discovered clear distinctions between the sexes in how they perceive and react to different scenarios and situations. This divergence in perception has been acknowledged and has led to some interesting developments of theory in the field of advertising and gender studies. Notably, there is evidence suggesting that women generally respond to advertising more favorably than men. This essay aims to explore the nuances of gender-specific reactions to advertising, particularly focusing on the role of sexism and sexual objectification, while discussing the implications for consumer attitudes and purchase intentions.

Gendered Perceptions of Sexism

Research indicates that women typically report a stronger aversion to female sexual appeals, such as nudity and sexiness, compared to men (Jones & Reid, 2009). Furthermore, it has been observed that women’s attitudes towards a brand can change negatively if sexual elements are present in the advertising (Lambiase & Reichert, 2003). Women are also more frequently depicted for sex appeal purposes in advertising than men are (Huang & Lowry, 2011). When sexual themes are employed, women tend to be more critical of female models, especially when explicit nudity or suggestive content is involved. Conversely, men often express more positive and energized reactions to such advertisements. This difference in perception is compounded by the observation that ads featuring a person of the opposite sex are generally more favored than those featuring a person of the same sex (Rouner, Slater & Domenech-Rodriguez, 2003).

Provocation and Nudity

Differences have also been noted in the responses to provocation and nudity between men and women. Studies have found that heterosexual men have a preference for female nudity, while heterosexual women prefer male nudity. This is partly attributed to the capacity for elaborative processing, which is reportedly greater in women. This cognitive difference increases the likelihood of women being offended by extreme sexual traits in ads, regardless of the model's gender (Pope, Voges & Brown, 2004). Women tend to consider the advertiser’s underlying motives and attach greater meaning to the depiction, whereas men often evaluate visual appeals in a more straightforward manner.

Social Identity and Gender Roles

Women have also been found to identify more strongly with their gender and to consider it as impacting life outcomes more significantly than men do. This could explain why gender discrimination affects women more intensely (Zell, Strickhouser, Lane, & Teeter, 2016). A study by Lass and Hart (2004) examined the reactions of individuals aged 18-35 to varying levels of nudity in ads, revealing that men found these ads more appealing than women did. Interestingly, the context of the sexual or stereotypical portrayal was a more critical determinant of whether women considered an ad offensive, rather than merely the level of nudity or sexiness. This study highlighted two strands of feminism: one against any sexual display of women in advertising, viewing it as objectifying, and the other accepting of such depictions if the woman is portrayed as independent and strong.

Implications for Advertising Strategies

Given these gender-specific reactions, it is essential for advertisers to consider the social and cultural context in which their ads are deployed. Using less traditional depictions of the female sex role has been found to be more effective and preferred by women than traditional portrayals (Rouner, Slater & Domenech-Rodriguez, 2003). Furthermore, both men and women have shown negative feelings towards overly distinct gender depictions of the opposite sex (Hofmann, 2016). Humor, a commonly used sexual appeal in advertising, tends to elicit more positive responses from men than women (Hensel & Riecken, 2012).

Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions

Consumer attitudes towards advertisements, particularly those that involve sexual objectification, can significantly influence purchase intentions. The Attitude-Towards-the-Ad Model posits that consumer attitudes are shaped by their perceptions of advertisements, which can be positive or negative (Batra & Ray, 1986; Cacioppo, Petty & Morris, 1983; MacKenzie, Lutz, & Belch, 1986; Moore & Hutchinson, 1983). In the current societal landscape, where sexism is a hotly debated topic and women have gained a higher social standing than in previous decades, sexually objectifying advertisements are often not perceived as authentic by contemporary consumers. Authenticity has become a crucial component of successful advertising strategies (Cornelis & Peter, 2017; Napoli et al., 2014; Schwabel, 2015; Ting, de Run & Jee, 2015).

Impact on Purchase Intention

The use of sexually objectifying advertisements can have a negative impact on brand evaluation and purchase intention. Negative brand associations, which can form quickly, are likely to decrease consumer interest in a brand (Um, 2013). Notably, consumers tend to pay more attention to negative information than to positive information (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993; Roper & Fill, 2012), meaning that negative associations from sexually objectifying ads might be especially detrimental in today’s society. This impact is exacerbated by the increasing consumer demand for authenticity, naturalness, and originality in advertising (Cornelis & Peter, 2017; Schwabel, 2015).

The Malaysian Context

Focusing specifically on Malaysian consumers, the connection between attitudes and purchase intentions towards sexually objectifying advertisements can be examined through the Attitude-Towards-the-Ad model. Research suggests that feelings, assumptions, interactions, and attitudes towards advertisements influence purchase intentions either directly or indirectly through brand attitude (Keller, 1993). Recognizing this potential connection provides a foundation for understanding how Malaysian consumers might respond to sexist advertisements.

Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding gender-specific reactions to advertising, particularly regarding sexism and sexual objectification, is vital for developing effective advertising strategies. The differences in perception and cognitive processing between men and women highlight the importance of considering social and cultural contexts in advertising. As consumers increasingly demand authenticity, advertisers must carefully balance the portrayal of gender roles in their campaigns to avoid negative brand associations and impact purchase intentions. By aligning advertising strategies with contemporary societal values and gender perspectives, brands can foster positive consumer attitudes and enhance purchase intentions.

Did you like this example?

385

16