Colonial Interpretations of “The Tempest”

For over a century, and particularly in the past two decades, scholars and critics have engaged with Shakespeare's "The Tempest" through the lens of colonialism and imperialism, exploring its underlying political themes and ideological implications. This approach to understanding the play dates back to 1818, when the English critic William Hazlitt first suggested that Prospero's usurpation of Caliban's rule over the island symbolized European colonial domination. This perspective has since evolved, becoming increasingly prevalent in North America in recent decades. The enduring interest in this interpretation reflects the play's rich potential for examining issues of power, authority, and cultural imperialism, which continue to resonate in contemporary discourse.

At the heart of this colonial interpretation lies the character of Prospero, who is depicted as a European figure exerting control over a remote island. Prospero’s dominion is facilitated by his possession of extraordinary magical powers, which he uses to establish a society that serves his own interests. He subjugates the island's original inhabitants, Ariel and Caliban, through a combination of coercive force, threats, enchantments, and promises of eventual freedom. This dynamic of control and exploitation aligns closely with the historical practices of European colonial powers, particularly during Shakespeare's time, when England was expanding its influence in the New World and Ireland. The character of Caliban serves as a focal point in this colonial reading. Often viewed as the island's rightful heir, Caliban is forced into servitude by Prospero and Miranda, despite his vocal resistance and assertion of his own authority. Initially, Prospero attempts to civilize Caliban by offering him European hospitality and teaching him language. In return, Caliban shares the island's natural resources with Prospero, a gesture of goodwill. However, Caliban's rejection of Prospero's imposed norms and his attempted assault on Miranda transform their relationship into one of master and slave. The gift of language, Caliban later asserts, is useful only insofar as it enables him to curse his oppressors.

Prospero's inability to recognize Caliban as an equal or fully human being underscores a critical aspect of the colonial allegory. Caliban is portrayed as uncultured and brutish, embodying European stereotypes of indigenous peoples encountered in the New World and other colonized regions. This portrayal reflects a Eurocentric worldview that categorizes non-Europeans as savage "others," justifying their subjugation and exploitation. Prospero, viewing himself as morally superior, believes he is justified in exerting authority over Caliban to ensure the safety and security of his own life and that of Miranda. This dynamic mirrors the paternalistic rationale often employed in colonial discourse, where colonizers claimed to bring civilization and order to supposedly uncivilized lands. Furthermore, Prospero's interactions with Ferdinand, who is deemed a suitable partner for Miranda due to his ability to conform to Prospero's standards, contrast sharply with his treatment of Caliban. Unlike Caliban, Ferdinand is perceived as capable of self-discipline and worthy of integration into Prospero's society. This distinction highlights the colonial ideology that values assimilation and conformity to European norms while marginalizing those who resist or fail to meet these expectations.

In conclusion, "The Tempest" offers a compelling exploration of colonial themes that remain relevant in discussions of power dynamics, cultural imperialism, and the legacy of colonialism. By examining Prospero's dominance over Caliban and the island, Shakespeare's play invites readers to reflect on the historical and ongoing impacts of colonial practices. The play's enduring appeal lies in its ability to provoke critical inquiry into issues of authority, cultural identity, and the human capacity for both oppression and resistance. As such, "The Tempest" continues to serve as a powerful lens through which to examine the complexities of colonial history and its lasting influence on contemporary society.

Did you like this example?

1065

44