Cultural Identity in Modern Turkish Cinema

Nationalism, a potent and often contentious ideology, has shaped the political and cultural landscapes of nations worldwide. Emerging from the upheaval of the French Revolution in 1789, nationalism has evolved into a multifaceted concept that influences national identity, governance, and social dynamics. This essay examines the ideology of nationalism in a broad context, before delving into its specific manifestation in Turkish nationalism and the complex position of the Kurds in Turkey. The 2001 film "Big Man Little Love," directed by Handan ?pekçi, serves as a cultural lens through which we explore these themes.

By analyzing the film alongside historical and ideological developments, we aim to provide a nuanced understanding of how nationalism influences societal structures and intergroup relations in Turkey.

The Ideology of Nationalism

Nationalism is a complex ideology that defies simple definition, as noted by Terry Eagleton in his exploration of ideologies. It encompasses a range of beliefs and practices that prioritize the interests and culture of a particular nation, often at the expense of others. While nationalism is commonly associated with patriotic love for one's country and heritage, it can also manifest in exclusionary practices that marginalize groups considered "other." This dual nature distinguishes nationalism from other ideologies, as it often seeks to homogenize diverse societies under a singular national identity, reducing tolerance for cultural differences (Freeden, 1998).

Historically, nationalism has been a driving force in the formation of modern nation-states. As societies transitioned from feudal systems to centralized governments, nationalism provided a framework for unifying people around shared language, culture, and history. However, this unification often involved the suppression of minority identities in favor of a dominant national narrative. The evolution of nationalism in the modern age reflects a shift from inclusive ideals of community and solidarity to more rigid constructs of identity and belonging (A?k?n, 2018). This shift underscores the inherent tension within nationalism between unity and diversity, a tension that is particularly evident in multicultural societies like Turkey.

Turkish Nationalism: Origins and Developments

Turkish nationalism emerged in the early 20th century as a response to the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire. The publication of "Three Styles of Politics" by Yusuf Akçura in 1904 marked a seminal moment in its development, advocating for a nationalist agenda centered on language, culture, and ethnicity. As the Ottoman Empire crumbled, Turkish nationalism sought to forge a new identity for the nascent Republic of Turkey by emphasizing commonalities among its diverse populations (Can, 2019).

This quest for national unity was complicated by the Ottoman Empire's legacy of multiculturalism, which included a mosaic of religious, ethnic, and linguistic groups. The Tanzimat and Islahat reforms of the late Ottoman period had granted certain rights to non-Muslim communities, fostering a sense of inclusion that clashed with rising nationalist sentiments. As nationalism gained momentum, these minority communities, including Arabs and Kurds, began to assert their own distinct identities, leading to tensions over independence and self-determination (Çal?k & Er, 2016).

Turkish nationalism has since evolved into several distinct forms, as outlined by Tan?l Bora and Murat Gültekingil in "Political Thought in Modern Turkey." These include Conservative Nationalism, which intertwines national identity with religious values; Ethnicist Nationalism, rooted in Turanism and cultural ethnicity; Liberal Nationalism, which incorporates ideas of capitalism and individual rights; National Left Nationalism, characterized by secularism and anti-imperialism; and Official Nationalism, grounded in the principles of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (Bora & Gültekingil, 2004). Each variant reflects different responses to Turkey's historical experiences and contemporary challenges, highlighting the diverse interpretations of nationalism within the country.

The Kurdish Question in Turkey

The status of the Kurds in Turkey presents a significant challenge to the nationalist project. As an ethnic group with distinct linguistic and cultural traditions, the Kurds have historically maintained a unique identity within the Ottoman and Turkish states. The Ottoman Empire's relatively tolerant approach allowed the Kurds to preserve their traditions, but the establishment of the Turkish Republic brought new pressures for assimilation (Ekinci, 2010).

The Kurdish question has been further complicated by the emergence of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), a militant organization advocating for Kurdish autonomy. The PKK's activities have been met with harsh state responses, exacerbating tensions and fueling cycles of violence and mistrust. This dynamic underscores the broader challenges of integrating minority groups within a nationalist framework that privileges uniformity over diversity.

"Big Man Little Love" offers a poignant exploration of these issues, depicting the human consequences of nationalist policies on intergroup relations. Through its narrative, the film highlights the struggles of individuals caught between competing identities, illustrating the personal and societal costs of unresolved ethnic tensions. By examining these themes, we gain insight into the complexities of Turkish nationalism and its impact on the Kurdish community.

Conclusion

In conclusion, nationalism remains a powerful force in shaping national identity and intergroup relations in Turkey. While it offers a sense of unity and purpose, it also poses significant challenges in accommodating diversity and addressing historical grievances. The evolution of Turkish nationalism, from its origins in the early 20th century to its contemporary manifestations, reflects these tensions and the ongoing struggle to reconcile unity with pluralism. The film "Big Man Little Love" serves as a cultural touchstone for understanding these dynamics, reminding us of the human impact of ideological conflicts. By critically engaging with the concepts of nationalism and identity, we can better appreciate the complexities of modern nation-states and the importance of fostering inclusive societies.

Did you like this example?

357

15