Comparing the Temperaments of Franklin and Paine

writer-avatar
Exclusively available on PapersOwl
Updated: Dec 05, 2024
Listen
Download
Cite this
Date added
2019/12/30
Pages:  2
Order Original Essay

How it works

When examining the works of Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine, it becomes evident that each writer possesses a distinct temperament that shapes their perspectives and writings. This essay aims to delve into the nuances of their beliefs and reasoning by exploring their views on religion, politics, and their vision for America. Despite their common goal of advocating for the betterment of society, Franklin and Paine exhibit fundamentally different approaches and philosophies that are worth exploring.

Divergent Philosophies

To understand the contrasting temperaments of Franklin and Paine, it is crucial to consider the backgrounds that informed their viewpoints.

Need a custom essay on the same topic?
Give us your paper requirements, choose a writer and we’ll deliver the highest-quality essay!
Order now

Benjamin Franklin, with his rich religious upbringing, often emphasized the role of organized religion in society. A key example can be found in the second part of his autobiography, where he writes, “Tho’ I seldom attended and Public Worship, I had still an Opinion of its Propriety, and of its Utility when rightly conducted, and I regularly paid my annual Subscription for the Support of the only Presbyterian Minister or Meeting we had in Philadelphia.” This statement reveals Franklin’s belief in the societal benefits of religious gatherings, even if he did not actively participate in them. His support for public worship reflects his conviction that religion plays a crucial role in fostering community and moral values.

In contrast, Thomas Paine’s writings reveal a preference for reason over belief. His skepticism towards organized religion is apparent from the very first sentence of “The Crisis,” where he states, “To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.” Paine’s emphasis on reason as a guiding principle in life underscores his belief in the power of human intellect and critical thinking as opposed to blind faith. Despite their differing approaches, both Franklin and Paine passionately advocate for their respective philosophies, each of which contributed significantly to the ideological landscape of their time.

Religion and Politics

Beyond their personal beliefs, Franklin and Paine also diverged in their approach to religion’s role in politics. Franklin, although not a regular churchgoer, supported the concept of religious gatherings as a means to nurture societal values. His belief in the utility of religion in society extended to his political views, where he saw the importance of collective moral standards in shaping a cohesive nation. Franklin’s vision of America was one where education and knowledge were accessible to all, as exemplified by his statement, “These libraries have improv’d the general Conversation of the Americans, made the common Tradesmen and Farmers as intelligent as most Gentlemen from other countries, and perhaps have contributed in some degree to the Stand so generally made throughout the Colonies in defense of their Privileges.” This perspective highlights his belief in the transformative power of knowledge and its role in empowering citizens.

On the other hand, Paine’s focus on the political implications of religion is evident in his critique of monarchial governance. He argues against the divine justification for kingship by asserting, “As the exalting one man so greatly above the rest cannot be justified on the equal rights of nature, so neither can it be defended on the authority of scripture; for the will of the almighty, as declared by Gideon and the prophet Samuel, expressly disapproves of government by kings.” Paine’s political writings, particularly in works like “Common Sense,” emphasize the need for democratic governance and the rejection of tyranny, arguing for a society governed by reason and equality rather than inherited power.

Conclusion

In summary, the contrasting temperaments of Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine are evident in their approaches to religion, politics, and their vision for America. Franklin's belief in the societal benefits of organized religion and the power of knowledge contrasts with Paine's emphasis on reason and rejection of monarchial rule. Despite their differences, both figures left enduring legacies that have shaped the ideological foundations of modern America. Franklin's advocacy for education and community values, combined with Paine's championing of reason and democratic principles, underscore their shared commitment to advancing society and fostering a better future. By examining their writings and philosophies, we gain a deeper understanding of the diverse intellectual currents that contributed to the formation of the United States.

The deadline is too short to read someone else's essay
Hire a verified expert to write you a 100% Plagiarism-Free paper
WRITE MY ESSAY
Papersowl
4.7/5
Sitejabber
4.7/5
Reviews.io
4.9/5

Cite this page

Comparing the Temperaments of Franklin and Paine. (2019, Dec 30). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/benjamin-franklin-and-thomas-paine/