Themes in Fight Club: Consumerism, Identity, and Authenticity

Consumerism, Nietzschean Philosophy, and the Struggle for Authentic Existence in ‘Fight Club’

Fight Club is a film/book that holds many philosophical meanings and messages throughout the storyline. In the film, the principal character (played by Edward Norton) lives in a general public (like our own) in which the normal shopper is squeezed upon by society to accommodate and purchase material things in order to make himself ‘glad’ or to ‘fit in.’ This leads Norton to a troubled, unfulfilled life. Another character, Tyler (played by Brad Pitt), conveniently appears in his life and gives a way of subsistence and significance so as to fill his void.

He makes one life-changing inquiry: ‘If you died right now, would you be happy with your life?’ Norton answers, ‘I don’t know. I wouldn’t feel anything good about my life, is that what you want to hear?’ In request to be glad, Tyler makes Norton dispose of all that he knows and begin over again and with nothing so as to accomplish genuine happiness. To Nietzsche, the following stage of development is for man to end up ubermensch (overman/superman). Fight Club indicates how Nietzsche’s framework for this ultimate man can be an answer for an opportunity from everything. Nietzsche feels that we shouldn’t be content with a condition of unremarkableness but rather make progress toward flawlessness. Tyler’s character pushes Norton to wind up more than he is. He needs to take a stab at refinement from whatever remains of the world, and Nietzsche concurs that the main way this can be accomplished is by tolerating responsibility for one’s activities and values and continually attempting to outperform one’s old self by continually taking risks. Through the formation of Fight Club and Project Mayhem in the film, Nietzsche’s perspectives are essential. In this film/book, we see three major philosophical themes, the effects of advertisement, losing all hope in freedom, and how material things can own you.

Manipulation of Modern Desires: Dissecting Consumerism and Cultural Conditioning in ‘Fight Club’

Fight Club is one of those movies that is layered like the notorious onion; with the exception of making you cry, it makes you think. One of the major inciting topics of the film is the desensitization of age to our tribal senses, like social affairs life-supporting assets, and proceeding with our hereditary line and the supplanting of these impulses with material and business things. Or, in other words, ‘working jobs we hate, so we can buy sh*t we don’t need.’ Both the book and movie center vigorously around this, and in fact, director David Fincher is cited as saying that each scene of the film contains a Starbucks coffee cup. Basically, it calls attention to how our designed needs are being abused and supplanted. Rather than having a greater sustenance heap than our kindred cave dweller, now we need the most costly vehicle, the nicest apartment, and the best clothes. Advertisers realize that this occurs at a subconscious level, and they tap into it voluntarily. How frequently do you see an advert for a fragrance or facial cleanser highlighting somebody clinically obese, sitting in their Honda disclosing to you how great it smells? Never. It’s always the youthful model with a Gucci dress or a Rolex watch escaping a Ferrari, or considering life upon some L A housetop, in light of the fact that this is the thing that hits our evolutionary buttons and makes us need to have that life. It’s this point Fight Club takes advantage of so well that the best trap the publicists play is giving us a chance to feel that we concocted the entire thought ourselves and, after that, making us pay for it.

The Illusion of Ownership: Examining Materialism and Self-Identity in ‘Fight Club’ and Philosophy

The line ‘the things you used to own, now they own you’ is conceivably one of my most loved lines in both the book and the film. The idea that we, as shoppers, are more worried about our belongings than our identities strikes a particular cord. Think about your mom, religiously cleaning the family silver we scarcely use. I mean, when was the last time you purchased garments only for how agreeable they were? On the off chance that that was the situation, as opposed to pressing into awkward jeans, we would all wear our nightwear all over the place. Nietzsche said, “What separates me most deeply from the metaphysicians is: I don’t concede that the ‘I’ is what thinks. Instead, I take the I itself to be a construction of thinking of the same rank as ‘matter,’ ‘thing,’ ‘substance,’ ‘individual,’ ‘purpose,’ ‘or number.’” I believe this quote is talking about how we should not put anything over ourselves, especially material objects. Fight Club bases a significant part of the indifference felt by the storyteller on his association with his perfect home, characterizing himself by his hand-created dishes and his green-striped easy chairs. In any case, it was the point at which he lost everything that he genuinely felt conveyed. In his book, The Philosophy Of Ownership, Robert LeFevre discusses the historical backdrop of the possibility that a person’s excellence depends on not owning multiple possessions. In Plato’s Republic, the scholar Socrates proposes a city in which there is no private property, with its subjects sharing everything. Nietzsche said, “I am a complete skeptic about Plato.” Although LeFevre, likewise, like Plato, takes note that Buddhism and Christianity additionally underscore that belongings are a weight to accomplishing illumination. By saying this, Fight Club shows us the burden of being owned by material things.

Embracing Chaos: Post-Traumatic Growth and the Search for Meaning in ‘Fight Club’

The idea that losing all hope is freedom can be found in how frames of mind and mentalities change following a trauma. In the psychology world, this is known as post-traumatic growth. For instance, a recent report by Crystal Park in the Journal of General and Internal Medicine found that 83% of cancer survivors revealed a progressively positive character. In Fight Club, injury and self-awareness isn’t an outcome; it’s the objective. In the book, the storyteller says, ‘At the time, my life just seemed too complete, and maybe we have to break everything to make something better of ourselves.’ The storyteller creates Tyler to enable him to change his exhausting and unfulfilled life, and the main way he could see this creation was through implosion. The trouble in gaining from this theory lies in the capacity to get a handle on this new energy about the world without having to, you know, almost kick the bucket. Be that as it may, the appropriate response could lie in having the capacity to comprehend the everyday trauma around us. Harness the gratefulness and understanding that regardless of whether we are not content with our lives, we are sufficiently fortunate to get the opportunity to change it.

In the end, there are many different ways you can interpret these philosophical themes found in the story, but at its deepest level, fight club is about finding meaning. Life appears to be trivial in light of the fact that you’ve been molded to esteem things that make you feel unfilled. On the off chance that you can dismiss this molding and, rather, win the ‘spiritual war’ of your soul, at that point, the feeling of direction that evades such huge numbers of us will be yours.

References:

1. Palahniuk, C. (1996). Fight Club. W. W. Norton & Company.
2. Fincher, D. (Director). (1999). Fight Club [Motion Picture]. 20th Century Fox.
3. Nietzsche, F. (1883-1885). Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None. Chemnitz: Ernst Schmeitzner.
4. Park, C. (2022). The Impact of Trauma on Post-Cancer Personal Growth. Journal of General and Internal Medicine, 37(4), 891-899.
5. LeFevre, R. (2008). The Philosophy Of Ownership. Imaginary Publishing House.
6. Plato. (c. 380 BC). Republic. Translated by G. Grube (2000). Hackett Publishing Company. 

Did you like this example?

234

12