Neglect of Rights under the Fourteenth Amendment

By guaranteeing equal protection, the Fourteenth Amendment remains a cornerstone in the fight for civil rights. However, despite its existence for over 150 years, many citizens feel that their rights as articulated in this amendment have been neglected. These concerns are particularly evident in areas such as racial discrimination, education inequality, and same-sex marriage. This essay will explore these issues, demonstrating how the promises of the Fourteenth Amendment are still unmet in various aspects of American life.

Historical Context and Legal Precedents

The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause has been at the center of numerous landmark Supreme Court cases that have shaped American society.

One of the most notable cases is Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which addressed racial segregation in public schools. This case challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine established by Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and ultimately led to its overturning. Chief Justice Earl Warren declared that "separate but equal" educational facilities are inherently unequal, thus violating the Fourteenth Amendment.

Despite this decision, educational inequality persists. A contemporary example is the lawsuit against Harvard University, which alleges discrimination against Asian-American applicants. This case highlights ongoing disparities in educational opportunities, suggesting that the principles established by Brown v. Board of Education have not been fully realized. In this context, the Fourteenth Amendment's promise of equal protection remains an unfulfilled ideal for many.

Modern Challenges to Equal Protection

Beyond education, the Fourteenth Amendment is also crucial in addressing issues related to gender identity and same-sex marriage. For instance, the debate over transgender bathroom access gained national attention when North Carolina passed a law restricting restroom use based on biological gender. This legislation was seen by many as a violation of the equal protection rights of transgender individuals, illustrating the ongoing struggle for civil rights in modern America.

Similarly, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), enacted in 1996, presented significant challenges to the recognition of same-sex marriages. It was not until the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) that same-sex marriage was recognized as a fundamental right under the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's opinion emphasized that marriage is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause, reinforcing the notion that all citizens should have equal access to this institution.

However, despite the progress made in Obergefell v. Hodges, challenges remain. In 2018, the Trump administration implemented a policy that restricted visas for same-sex partners of foreign diplomats, effectively forcing many to marry or leave the country. This policy was criticized as discriminatory and highlighted the ongoing battle for LGBTQ+ rights in America.

Intersectionality and Equal Protection

A critical aspect of understanding the Fourteenth Amendment's application is the concept of intersectionality. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw, intersectionality acknowledges that individuals may face multiple forms of discrimination simultaneously, such as those based on race, gender, or sexual orientation. This framework is essential for addressing complex civil rights issues that cannot be understood through a single-axis lens.

The Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause has been criticized for its categorical approach, which often fails to account for the nuanced realities of intersectional discrimination. For instance, individuals who belong to multiple marginalized groups may find that their unique experiences of injustice are not adequately addressed by existing legal frameworks. Incorporating an intersectional perspective into legal interpretations could help ensure that the Fourteenth Amendment fulfills its promise of equal protection for all citizens.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the Fourteenth Amendment was designed to guarantee equal protection and fundamental rights for all citizens, its promises remain only partially fulfilled. Historical and modern challenges, such as racial discrimination, educational inequality, and issues related to gender identity and same-sex marriage, demonstrate that the amendment's ideals have not been fully realized. To address these shortcomings, it is crucial to adopt a more nuanced understanding of discrimination, incorporating the principles of intersectionality into legal interpretations. By doing so, we can work towards a society where the rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment are truly respected and protected for everyone.

Did you like this example?

411

17