The Moral and Societal Implications of Control in Brave New World

Introduction

Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World" presents a dystopian society where the World State exerts control over its citizens through a variety of methods and devices. Among these, the control of reproduction, the use of sex as a distraction, and the distribution of the drug soma are particularly notable. This essay argues that the most morally objectionable method of control in the World State is its manipulation of human reproduction, which deprives individuals of their fundamental rights and freedoms. Additionally, while soma and the sexual distractions serve to maintain societal stability, they raise ethical questions about individuality and freedom.

The essay will explore these mechanisms, assess their moral implications, and consider whether such a society could ever exist in reality.

Control of Reproduction

The control of reproduction in the World State is arguably the most morally objectionable practice because it involves the surgical removal of women's ovaries and the application of the Bokanovsky Process. This process not only strips women of their reproductive rights but also manipulates the very essence of human life. As Huxley writes, “The surrogate goes round slower; therefore passes through the lung at longer intervals; therefore gives the embryo less oxygen. Nothing like oxygen-shortage for keeping an embryo below par” (Huxley Chapter 1). This quote underscores the dehumanizing nature of the process, where embryos are deliberately deprived of oxygen to create a predetermined class hierarchy. Such control over human life raises profound ethical concerns, as it eliminates any semblance of personal freedom or choice, turning individuals into mere products of a mechanized system.

The Role of Sex in Society

In the World State, sex is employed as a tool for distraction, ensuring that citizens remain compliant and satisfied with their roles in the consumer society. While it may seem paradoxical, the World Controllers do not eliminate sex drives because they serve to relieve stress and provide entertainment. The society’s government uses sex to channel emotions, preventing individuals from questioning their surroundings. As illustrated in the song, “Orgy-porgy, Ford and fun, Kiss the girls and make them One. Boys at one with girls at peace; Orgy-porgy gives release” (Huxley Chapter 5), sex becomes a means of maintaining social order. However, by reducing a deeply personal and emotional act to a mere societal function, the World State strips sex of its intimacy and connection, raising moral questions about the commodification of human relationships.

The Dependency on Soma

Soma is the World State’s most powerful tool for subduing and controlling its citizens, offering an escape from reality and ensuring compliance with societal norms. Without soma, the World State would struggle to maintain its facade of happiness and stability. The drug serves to comfort and divert citizens from the underlying corruption of the State. As Lenina remarks, “When the individual feels, the community reels” (Huxley Chapter 6), highlighting the dependence on soma to suppress individuality and maintain societal harmony. While soma eliminates the negative effects associated with substances like alcohol, its use remains morally questionable because it enslaves individuals to a superficial sense of contentment, depriving them of genuine emotional experiences and personal growth.

Positive Aspects of the World State

Despite its many ethical shortcomings, the World State does offer certain positive aspects that merit consideration. The absence of diseases, unemployment, and poverty contributes to a stable and efficient society. Additionally, the elimination of childbirth through technological means can be seen as a relief from the burdens of reproduction. However, this perspective is not without its drawbacks, as it deprives individuals of the ability to form familial bonds. Furthermore, the notion of guilt-free sex allows people to live without societal judgment or pressure, promoting a sense of personal freedom. As Huxley notes, “What with mothers and lovers, what with the prohibitions they were not conditioned to obey, what with the temptations and the lonely remorses, what with all the diseases and the endless isolating pain, what with the uncertainties and the poverty” (Huxley Chapter 3), the World State offers an escape from the challenges and uncertainties of life. Nonetheless, such an existence comes at the cost of individuality and emotional depth.

The Reality of a Brave New World

While Huxley's imagined World State may seem far-fetched, certain parallels can be drawn with contemporary society. Advances in genetic engineering, such as prenatal fetal genotyping, reflect elements of the novel’s reproductive control. However, the likelihood of a society evolving into a full-fledged World State is limited by the persistence of individual freedoms and civil liberties. As countries become more environmentally conscious and less consumerist, the possibility of such a dystopian future diminishes. The enduring presence of personal beliefs and the right to self-expression provide a safeguard against the complete subversion of individuality. As the novel suggests, “And opening an insulated door he showed them racks upon racks of numbered test-tubes. ‘The week’s supply of ova. Kept’” (Huxley Chapter 1), it is crucial to remain vigilant of technological advancements that may encroach upon fundamental human rights.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Huxley’s "Brave New World" presents a chilling vision of a society where control is achieved through the manipulation of reproduction, the commercialization of sex, and the distribution of soma. While each of these methods serves a purpose in maintaining societal order, they raise significant ethical concerns about the loss of individuality, freedom, and genuine human connection. The novel serves as a cautionary tale, urging readers to reflect on the moral implications of technological and societal advancements. As we navigate the complexities of modern life, it is essential to balance progress with the preservation of fundamental human values, ensuring that the future remains a place where individuality and freedom can flourish.

Did you like this example?

1049

44