Privilege and Economic Prosperity: a Complex Interplay

Like economists parsing tea leaves, scholars and pundits endlessly debate the mysterious ingredients of national prosperity. While many advocate for a meritocracy—a system where success is ostensibly based on individual talent and hard work—it is crucial to acknowledge the significant role of privilege in shaping a person's economic trajectory. This essay argues that privilege, often manifesting through structural inequalities such as race and gender, plays a crucial role in determining economic prosperity, despite the meritocratic ideals that suggest otherwise.

By examining the interplay between privilege and merit, we can better understand the barriers to social mobility and economic success for marginalized groups.

The Illusion of Meritocracy

The concept of meritocracy was popularized by Michael Young in his 1958 satirical work "The Rise of Meritocracy," which critiqued the UK's educational system. Young's work highlighted the flawed notion that intelligence and effort alone dictate success. In the context of neo-liberalism, this idea has gained traction, emphasizing individual agency while downplaying the impact of structural inequalities. Neo-liberalism, with its focus on the individual, suggests that anyone can achieve success through sheer determination. However, this perspective neglects the systemic barriers that privilege certain groups over others. For instance, access to quality education, social networks, and economic capital often depends on factors beyond individual control, such as race, gender, and socioeconomic background. As scholars like Colic-Peisker and Johnson (2012) argue, structural inequalities are pervasive, granting certain individuals unearned advantages while hindering others.

Racial Inequality and Economic Mobility

One of the most evident manifestations of privilege is racial inequality, which significantly affects economic mobility. The Cronulla Riots of 2005 serve as a stark reminder of the racial tensions in Australia, where white Australians sought to define national identity by excluding non-white individuals, regardless of their birthplace (Perera 2006). This event underscores the deep-seated privilege associated with being part of the racial majority, which often translates into greater access to opportunities and resources. Moreover, the legacy of colonialism and white supremacy has entrenched racial disparities, affecting everything from employment prospects to educational attainment.

Cultural diversity further complicates the issue, as children from different backgrounds often face unique challenges in educational settings. Research by Ameneh Shahaeian highlights how Eastern and Western cultural values shape children's cognitive and social development differently. In Australia, this cultural dissonance contributes to the persistent "closing the gap" issue, where Indigenous children feel marginalized and undervalued in the education system. Consequently, their limited access to quality education restricts their social mobility and economic opportunities. Racial privilege, therefore, grants the majority more opportunities for upward mobility, reinforcing economic disparities.

Gender Inequality and Economic Barriers

In addition to racial privilege, gender plays a significant role in shaping economic outcomes. Historically, gender has been neglected in mainstream political discourse, with male interests often considered universal. This oversight perpetuates gender inequality, affecting everything from wage gaps to career advancement. While progress has been made in closing the gender pay gap and increasing female representation in leadership roles, traditional gender roles continue to burden women with domestic responsibilities. According to Gideon Calder, the assumption that men represent the human species has led to the marginalization of women's experiences and needs.

The division of domestic labor remains skewed, with women shouldering the majority of household and childcare duties. This imbalance limits women's ability to pursue careers and achieve economic independence. Despite recent achievements by women in various fields, such as Katie Bouman's groundbreaking work in astrophysics, gender bias persists in male-dominated industries. The patriarchy and internalized gender norms restrict women's upward mobility, denying them the economic prosperity they could achieve with equal opportunities.

Support Systems and Overcoming Disadvantage

While structural inequalities present significant barriers, the right support and encouragement can help individuals overcome these challenges. Research by Maria Gardner, Kirsty Morrin, and Geoff Payne illustrates how a strong support network can enable disadvantaged individuals to succeed. Participants from the 'Care' group, who lacked conventional family structures, attributed their success to personal agency and external support, such as role models and emotional backing from foster carers. This highlights the importance of supportive environments in facilitating access to education and upward mobility, even in the face of adversity.

Conclusion

In conclusion, privilege is a pivotal factor in determining economic prosperity, influencing the level of opportunity and social mobility available to individuals. While meritocracy and neo-liberalism emphasize individual agency, they fail to account for the structural inequalities that create barriers to success. Racial and gender privileges grant certain groups unearned advantages, limiting the economic potential of marginalized individuals. However, with the right support systems, individuals with predisposed disadvantages can still achieve success and prosperity. Addressing these structural inequalities requires a collective effort to dismantle systemic barriers and create a more equitable society where true meritocracy can thrive. By recognizing and addressing the role of privilege, we can work towards a future where economic prosperity is accessible to all, regardless of race, gender, or background.

Did you like this example?

700

29