PLG Civil Liberties and Multicultural Studies

Racial Profiling

You and your friend are walking down the street in New York City and you happen to notice the NYPD are conducting stop and frisks , but there seems to be a consistent pattern going on . The only people they’re searching are african americans or hispanic people . They let you go but tell your friend she needs to put her hands against the wall. She refuses and they arrest her. What would you do and how would you feel ?

Before we can delve into scenarios, we need to know the meaning of racial profiling. Racial Profiling is the use of race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone having committed an offense . In blatant terms, you assume they have committed a crime or are up to something mischievous because of their race. For example, Muslims are often targeted for acts of terrorism, and hispanics are targeted for illegal immigration . According to the U.S. Department of Corrections, black male adolescents ranging from the ages 18 to 19 were more than 10 times likely to be in state or federal prison than white males. Racial profiling goes as far back as the colonial times , but it wasn’t fully recognized as a crime by law officials until the 1980’s. For example, during the Jim Crow era, a registry created specifically for african americans to keep track of all physical characteristics of each individual as well as how that person came to be free. This was created to limit the amount of free black people in the south. If they were unable to prove their status from this registry, they could be forced into slavery. This carried on up until the civil rights movement in the 1950’s. Ironically, the supreme court states that you need more than probable cause to convict someone, but back in the day that wasn’t really a priority.

In the 1800s-1960’s , if you were an african american you could be accused of anything whether you were guilty or not and sentenced to death. In the article : Whren at Twenty: Systemic racial bias and the criminal justice system, the author explains how law enforcement and the african american community have reached profuse levels of conflict in society . Law enforcement has been murdering black people just over their own “suspicion” when in reality, it’s just their prejudice ,biased , and corrupted views. Unfortunately, this racial injustice can be dated back as far as the 1800’s. The writer starts to give examples such as: Tamir Rice, 12 year old boy shot and killed for playing with a toy gun, Samuel DuBose, Officials claim he was being dragged by Dubose’s car , yet no physical evidence proves that . They have this “broken windows” policy, which allows cops to violate the law . The writer talks about an important case: Whren vs. The United States; Decided in 1996, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided that any traffic offense committed by a driver was a legitimate legal basis for a stop. The moral of this article was the african american community has faced so much oppression at the hands of our founding fathers as well as the law that abides them . In the article : Trayvon Martin:Racial Profiling, Black Male Stigma, and Social Work Practice, the author talks about how racial profiling has negatively impacted the black community. The author also brings attention to a case that made headlines worldwide with an disappointing result.

Trayvon Martin , a 17 – year old high school kid walking home from a convenience store with nothing but a bag of skittles and a soft drink in his hand. George Zimmerman, was a neighborhood watch captain and claimed that the teenager was “up to no good” . Now call me crazy, but what could a 17 – year old possibly do with skittles ? Zimmerman contacted the local authorities and they advised him to halt his pursuit in Trayvon. Disregarding anything the cops had told him , he continues to follow him and then fatally shoots him. Zimmerman was charged with first degree murder but was quickly acquitted. How can someone clearly guilty of murder be acquitted so quickly for murder? Unfortunately, the only speculation they had was reasonable doubt and that is not enough to indict someone. There was no evidence present that could prove Zimmerman was the assailant. Also, the prosecution did not anticipate that on the eve of trial their potentially most persuasive evidence, the forensic testimony that it was Martin who was calling for help just before the shot was fired, would be barred by the judge. Although this decision too appears correct, prosecutors have often been allowed to present shaky forensic evidence. Outage spread like wildfire as the news of his aquittal grabbed national attention . This is where we were introduced once again to the depths of racial profiling and how it affects the black community.Zimmerman had no reason to believe this kid was dangerous, he could only see the color of this child’s skin, but he was still a child nonetheless. This trial was clearly one sided but it only started to go downhill from here .

Do you ever stop yourself and think why most racial suits by law enforcements don’t make it up to the supreme court or are dismissed ? The United States Supreme court has made it impossible to seek justice for these types of cases . It is as if they are more concerned about protecting their brothers in blue, regardless of the crime committed. For example, Sandra Bland was pulled over by state trooper Brian Encina for failing to signal when changing into the right lane. After an intense exchange of words from both sides, she was forced out her vehicle and assaulted on the sidewalk . After forcing her onto the ground and placing cuffs behind her back, state trooper Brian Encia took Sandra bland into custody . Approximately 3 days later , Sandra Bland was found dead in her cell . Her death was instantly ruled a suicide, however something is not adding up here. Her family still has many unanswered questions that officials are refusing to answer af if they are trying to cover up for something. There was never an investigation as to why she was dead as well as the treatment she endured while with Encia. If roles were reversed and a cop was assaulted & then killed, 9 times out of 10 an investigation would launch ASAP and that person would pay for their crime. How is it that we are supposed to trust a system that does more harm than help? According to the article Perceptions of Police, Racial Profiling and Psychological Outcomes: A Mixed Methodological Study, studies have reported that race influences misperceptions of weapons when it comes to split-second decision making with police, meaning they are prone to assuming minorities are more likely to be carrying a weapon than a white person. Looks can be very deceiving. If minorities are as dangerous as police claim , where is the evidence ? Granted every place has crime , some more than others; but what about The Sandy Hook school shooting , the Boston Bomber ? A majority of these mass shootings happen to be white males, and yet the justice system is lenient on them despite their heinous crimes. On June 17th, 2015 at approximately 9:00 PM, 21 year old Dylann Roof walked into Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, a historic church in Charleston, South Carolina and killed 9 people . Witnesses state that before he started shooting, he announced he was there to kill black people. He was arrested the next morning and later admitted to the authorities that he was trying to start a race war . What is most disturbing in this case is how he was treated when he was apprehended by authorities. He was given fair treatment as well as burger king . Now call me crazy , but if he was a minority like how Sandra Bland was treated in Federal custody, he would have been badly beaten or worse; dead . Once this made headlines, there was talk . People were discussing how this was an act of terrorism , however authorities refuse to acknowledge it as such. The law can be very contradicting and one sided . The hardest pill to swallow is that the people we are supposed to entrust with our lives are the ones that are so quick to cover up the injustice and oppression that has been going for decades .

In 1955 , Emmett Till, a 14 year old african american boy from Chicago was murdered by two white men for allegedly flirting with a white woman . Outraged husband Roy Bryant and his brother-in-law J.W. Milam dragged Till out of his home and took him behind a tool shed belonging to Milam later discovered and beat him badly. They then forced him to carry a 75 pound cotton gin fan up to the Tallahatchie River and ordered him to take off his clothes. They then proceeded to gouge out his eyes, shoot him in the head , tied his ankles with barbed wire to a cotton gin fan and toss him into the river. His body was discovered 3 days later, but they had trouble identifying him due to the severe mutilation . The only way they could identify him was the ring he had on his finger. Local authorities tried to cover up this murder as quickly as they could, however Till’s mother requested it to be sent back to Chicago .

Horrified by the condition of her mutilated son’s body , she decided to have an open casket funeral for everyone to see what racist murderers did to her only son. An african american weekly magazine calle Jet , took pictures of the mutilated body and put it in the magazine. This grabbed the media’s attention instantly. Less than 2 weeks after his body was buried, Roy and J.W. were on trial in a segregated courthouse for the murder of Emmett Till. On September 23rd, The defendants were found not guilty by an all white jury. The jurors claimed it was because the state had failed to prove the identity of the body. The public was outraged, not only for the not guilty verdict,but for the states failure to persecute the defendants for kidnapping Till. Decades later, Carolyn ( the woman he supposedly flirted with), recanted her testimony . In the article : Policing the Boundaries of Whiteness: The Tragedy of Being “Out of Place” from Emmett Till to Trayvon Martin, The author compares Emmett Till & Trayvon Martin’s unjust deaths. Both Emmett and Trayvon were murdered without any probable cause; just hearsay. Unfortunately the law fails to protect anybody who isn’t a white male. Truthfully , times have not changed . She states : ”More specifically, I take what many view as an extraordinary case about racial hatred from the 1950s, the Emmett Till murder and trial, and compare it to the Trayvon Martin killing and trial outcome in the 2010s, to reveal how the same racist principles that undergirded the Till case remain quite ordinary today.” Both were clearly guilty of the crimes they committed and yet no justice was given .

No speculation was in place , just ignorance and people abiding by the stereotypes of african american and how “dangerous” they are. The real question is , are they ? Should we fear them ? Absolutely not . In the news today , All mass shootings have been by white people, and yet we aren’t afraid. We are so quick to justify killing a minority because they were dangerous , but we don’t fear them…They fear us . Now, given the information you have now, would you stand back and let a policeman stop and frisk your friend because she looks “dangerous” or “could be trouble” ? Or would you stand up and say something ? It may be 2019 , but it sure feels like we never left the 1950’s .”

Did you like this example?

3631

403