Life’s Core Questions

Philosophy of life constitutes a set of guiding principles or values that influence individuals' decisions regarding their daily lives. These life philosophies provide frameworks for understanding what to do, how to do it, and how to be in various situations. Throughout history, people have adhered to these philosophies, driven by the belief that they lead to happiness and a fulfilling existence. The ultimate objective of life philosophies is to enable individuals to lead meaningful lives, while those who deviate from these principles are often perceived as misguided or lost.

While many life philosophies share a common goal of promoting happiness, they often contradict each other on similar issues. For instance, when it comes to desire, philosophies such as Stoicism and Epicureanism both aim to ensure contentment, yet they propose different approaches. Desiring something one does not possess can lead to unhappiness, a notion discouraged by both philosophies. Stoicism, for example, encourages individuals to see themselves as part of a larger whole, encompassing society, family, and humanity as a whole.

This essay will delve into the Stoic and Epicurean philosophies of life, examining the teachings of Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius' "Meditations" as they exemplify Stoicism. It will also explore the main disagreements between Epicureans and Stoics regarding how best to live, focusing on the role of pleasure, emotion, and desire in human well-being. Additionally, the essay will evaluate the positions of both philosophies, offering insights into their applicability and relevance in today's world.

Stoic Philosophy

Stoic philosophy of life has its origins in the teachings of the Stoics, who lived over two millennia ago. Zeno of Citium is credited as the founder of Stoicism. Despite the passage of time and changes in societal contexts, the core tenets of Stoicism have remarkably endured. Stoicism was categorized into three main areas: Ethics, Physics, and Logic. The Stoics distinguished between what is internal and what is external. External factors included social status and outward actions, while internal factors were the choices and decisions made by individuals, which were entirely within their control.

One of the key principles of Stoicism is the separation of the body from the inner self. The body is seen as impermanent, subject to decomposition, and influenced by external factors beyond individual control. Stoicism discourages indulgence in bodily pleasures, such as sexual activities, as they are perceived as distractions from the pursuit of wisdom. According to Stoic philosophy, wisdom is the ultimate good, and exercising wisdom in decision-making is paramount. The Stoics believed that eliminating excessive desires was essential to achieving happiness.

Epictetus, a prominent Stoic philosopher, emphasized that a person's life is not determined by external events but by their response to those events. He taught that happiness stems from the correct use of material resources, rather than health or wealth, which are considered desires. Marcus Aurelius, a Roman emperor influenced by Stoicism, advocated for simplicity and humility. He lived a life focused on inner virtues, disregarding wealth and fame, and prioritized actions that benefited humanity.

Epicurean Philosophy

Epicurean philosophy of life, on the other hand, places pleasure at the center of human existence. Epicurus, the founder of this school of thought, believed that pleasure was the ultimate good. This philosophy has often been labeled as hedonistic, derived from the Greek word for pleasure. Unlike Stoicism, Epicureanism encourages the pursuit of pleasure, but with a nuanced understanding.

Epicurus advocated for desiring only what individuals could control, dismissing the pursuit of wealth and fame. He recognized that human beings have natural desires, such as the need for food and water, which are essential for survival. Instead of ignoring these natural needs, Epicurus advised individuals to simplify their desires, focusing on what is attainable and necessary. He argued that happiness should not be contingent on material wealth but on avoiding psychological pain caused by disturbing thoughts and emotions.

Points of Contention

The Stoics and Epicureans diverge on several key issues. While both agree that happiness is the ultimate goal, they differ in their definitions. Stoics equate happiness with virtue, whereas Epicureans associate it with pleasure. In terms of desire, both philosophies recognize that desiring external things can lead to unhappiness. However, Epicurus acknowledges the natural desires humans possess, such as the need for sustenance, while Stoics are more inclined to suppress desires altogether.

Another point of contention is the role of pleasure. Epicurus asserts that living well is synonymous with experiencing pleasure, defined as a lack of mental disturbance and physical pain. Conversely, Stoics reject the pursuit of pleasure, advocating for a life guided by reason and virtue.

Pleasure, Emotion, and Desire

Understanding the role of pleasure, emotion, and desire in human well-being is crucial. It is essential for individuals to recognize the aspects of life they can control and those beyond their control. Making wise decisions regarding controllable matters is key to a fulfilling life. With regard to pleasure, individuals should seek contentment in actions aligned with ethical principles. Emotionally, it is important to cultivate positive feelings and manage negative emotions that can lead to distress.

Desires should be directed towards essential needs, such as sustenance, while avoiding those that harm the well-being of others. Desiring material wealth without effort can lead to dissatisfaction. It is also important to avoid comparing oneself to others, as this can result in unhappiness.

While I resonate with the Stoic perspective that excessive desires lead to harmful emotions, my agreement extends primarily to emotions with negative impacts, such as sadness, depression, and anger. Eliminating harmful desires is beneficial. I also appreciate the Epicurean emphasis on desiring only what is within control, as it encourages individuals to avoid pain and focus on attainable goals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the exploration of Stoic and Epicurean philosophies reveals contrasting yet insightful approaches to life. Stoicism emphasizes wisdom, virtue, and the management of desires, while Epicureanism prioritizes pleasure and the pursuit of attainable desires. Both philosophies offer valuable lessons for navigating life's complexities. Understanding the role of pleasure, emotion, and desire in human well-being can lead to informed decision-making and a more fulfilling life. By integrating the wisdom of these philosophies, individuals can cultivate balanced and meaningful lives in the modern world.

Did you like this example?

775

32