Behavioral Psychology in Crisis Situations

Many fundamental aspects of human nature are often obscured by the comforts of modern convenience and the absence of immediate existential threats. However, these concealed traits can be brought to the forefront by extreme circumstances. Albert Camus’s novel *The Plague* provides a vivid illustration of such a scenario, using the quarantined city of Oran as a microcosm to depict what happens to a population stripped of their conveniences and placed in a state of existential limbo. The titular plague renders the inhabitants nearly helpless, as the specter of death looms over the city, striking swiftly and indiscriminately.

Exploring Human Nature

In this context, *The Plague* serves as an ideal petri dish to examine human nature in its most raw and exposed form. Camus employs various sociological and philosophical lenses to explore what happens when the structures and systems we rely on collapse. The narrative poses profound questions about meaning, morality, and the human condition in the face of adversity.

Throughout the novel, characters attempt to ascribe meaning to the seemingly random and merciless ravages of the plague. One such attempt is made by Father Paneloux, who interprets the plague as a manifestation of divine judgment upon the sinful. This viewpoint aligns with the Augustinian perspective that humans are inherently sinful and often oblivious to their transgressions until they are revealed through divine scrutiny. Paneloux epitomizes this idea in his sermon to the people of Oran, proclaiming, “For plague is the flail of God and the world His threshing floor, and implacably He will thresh out His harvest until the wheat is separate from the chaff. There will be more chaff than wheat” (Camus 95). Although compelling, this interpretation reflects a theological stance that not all readers may accept, particularly those with secular or atheistic worldviews.

Ethical Ambiguities

The novel also delves into ethical ambiguities through characters like Raymond Rambert, a journalist trapped in Oran. Rambert exemplifies a Machiavellian quest for power, though not in the traditional sense. Rather than seeking dominance over others, he desires the power to escape the city's confines and reunite with his wife. Machiavelli asserts that traditional ethics must be ignored in the pursuit of power, suggesting that a prince may need to act contrary to good faith, charity, and humanity to preserve his domain. Rambert’s actions reflect this idea as he considers risking the lives of countless people outside the city in his quest for personal gain.

This self-interested behavior also aligns with Thomas Hobbes’s philosophy, which posits that humans are inclined to act out of self-interest. Hobbes describes human nature as a “perpetual and restless desire for power… because [one] cannot assure the power and means to live well, which he hath present, without the acquisition of more.” Rambert’s desire to escape demonstrates this notion, driven by the fear that his life outside Oran will be irrevocably altered by prolonged separation from his wife. He strives to maintain his accustomed standard of living, threatened by the uncertainty of the quarantine.

Initially, Rambert attempts to secure his freedom through official channels, asking Dr. Rieux for medical clearance. Rieux denies the request, emphasizing the risk of spreading the plague. While Rambert accuses Rieux of being heartless and living “in a world of abstractions,” Rieux’s actions embody Plato’s notion that rational thought must prevail over emotion to achieve truth and justice. Rambert’s inability to see this as fair exemplifies Franz Boas’s idea of cultural relativity, as he bases his morality on a society not ravaged by plague.

When official channels fail, Rambert turns to criminal means to escape, illustrating Adam Smith’s concept of the “rational utility maximizer.” This term describes the human proclivity for maximizing personal benefit using available resources. However, Rambert ultimately abandons his escape plans, influenced by the selflessness of Rieux and Tarrou, echoing Plato’s assertion that people are good only when observed by others.

The Spectrum of Human Conduct

While the plague exposes ethical shortcomings, it also reveals humanity's capacity for kindness and cooperation. Jean Tarrou emerges as a paragon of innate goodness, standing alongside Dr. Rieux in the fight against the plague. Tarrou embodies Peter Kropotkin’s concept of mutual aid, positing that people will naturally cooperate to enhance the collective well-being. He spearheads the civilian branch of the plague relief effort, demonstrating his belief in the nobility of fighting death, even if ultimately futile.

Tarrou and Rieux’s humanitarian endeavors align with Aristotle’s view that humans are social beings who use reason to attain happiness or minimize suffering. Their commitment to common decency reflects a worldview where acting for the greater good is the norm. This concept of preexisting decency aligns with Immanuel Kant’s notion of an a priori sense of duty, a moral law inherent in all people.

Limits of Reason

Camus also explores the limits of reason through characters like Joseph Grand. Grand’s obsession with perfecting the opening line of his manuscript paralyzes him, reflecting the saying “the perfect is the enemy of the good.” His life stagnates due to his emotional need for perfection, preventing progress in his career and personal life. This irrational pursuit mirrors Dostoevsky’s idea that humans often struggle to reconcile emotions with the indifferent natural world, leading to futile actions against their condition.

Interestingly, Camus highlights how people cling to social structures amidst crisis. Despite Oran’s isolation and mortality reminders, its citizens strive to maintain normalcy. They continue working, watching movies, and adhering to societal norms, illustrating Émile Durkheim’s concept of “social facts.” These are cultural manifestations that persist even as other aspects erode, emphasizing the role of experience in shaping culture.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Albert Camus's *The Plague* offers a profound exploration of human nature under duress. Through diverse characters and philosophical lenses, the novel examines how extreme circumstances reveal fundamental aspects of humanity, from ethical ambiguities to innate goodness. The narrative underscores the tension between reason and emotion, the persistence of social structures, and the enduring struggle against forces beyond human control. Ultimately, *The Plague* invites readers to reflect on their own responses to adversity and the multifaceted nature of the human condition.

Did you like this example?

537

23