Mental Health Frameworks in Public Safety

Phyllis struggles with a complex mental health issue, schizophrenia, which manifests as auditory hallucinations. These episodes have had serious consequences, including an incident where she destroyed her furniture. Consequently, Phyllis was admitted to Conflictia Hope Hospital, where Dr. Nguyen, a dedicated psychiatrist, oversees her care. Due to the potential danger associated with her condition, Phyllis was placed on an involuntary hold. Her treatment, however, is complicated by her tendency to stop taking her medication, often due to feelings of lethargy and lack of motivation.

This situation represents a significant conflict between Phyllis's desire for autonomy and the hospital's duty to ensure public safety.

Phyllis's primary goal is to leave the hospital and regain her independence. However, the hospital is concerned about the potential risk to others if she does not adhere to her medication regimen. Despite the hospital's efforts to facilitate her transition back into society, Phyllis's recent noncompliance with staff has hindered her progress. To address this, the hospital considers involving Sandy, a trusted third party, to negotiate a mutually beneficial plan.

Applying Conflict Resolution Theories

One of the learning objectives of this case is to apply Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to conflict resolution to enhance problem-solving skills. By understanding Phyllis's needs—from basic physiological requirements to higher-level psychological ones—Sandy can better negotiate a plan that addresses these needs, thus ensuring Phyllis's well-being. Additionally, identifying which conflict resolution theories best align with specific disputes is crucial for effective integration into the resolution process. Emotional intelligence emerges as a vital competency for communication, negotiation, and conflict management, especially in high-stakes situations involving public safety concerns.

Preparation is essential for any conflict resolution, particularly when it involves public safety. The overarching question is: What is the ultimate goal of the negotiation? Phyllis seeks freedom and autonomy, while Sandy, representing the hospital, aims to establish a treatment plan that both parties can agree on, ensuring Phyllis’s safe reintegration into society.

Sandy’s role involves crafting a contract and potentially employing creative solutions to satisfy both Phyllis and the hospital. Establishing clear objectives is critical: developing an acceptable treatment plan, fostering a positive relationship between Phyllis and the hospital, and drafting a contract outlining these goals. These objectives serve as a guide during negotiations. The initial approach involves both power and rights perspectives, transitioning to an interest-based negotiation strategy. Although Sandy holds power as a social psychologist, Phyllis's legal rights must be acknowledged and respected. The interest-based approach focuses on shared problem-solving, aiming for mutually beneficial outcomes.

Strategizing the Negotiation

Diversity, while not cultural in this context, plays a role in the conflict resolution process. A strategic approach is necessary to address Phyllis's anger towards Sandy, who she perceives as aligning with the hospital. Building trust is essential, and the negotiation environment should be comfortable and non-threatening. Planning a mid-day meeting at the hospital, in a warm and secure setting, will facilitate open communication.

Sandy needs the authority to make decisions during the negotiation, which requires prior consultation with the hospital. Establishing rules of engagement is crucial to maintaining a constructive dialogue. Phyllis must understand that any unsafe behavior will halt negotiations, and communication rules must be followed to ensure a respectful exchange of ideas.

During the meeting, Sandy's ability to actively listen and empathize with Phyllis is key to advancing the negotiation. Phyllis, while more stable, still needs to progress through Maslow's hierarchy. Sandy's breakthrough in establishing rapport with Phyllis paves the way for discussing a treatment plan that balances autonomy with necessary oversight. A potential compromise involves Phyllis taking her medication regularly while attending weekly hospital check-ins, gradually extending intervals as her condition stabilizes.

If Phyllis resists, alternative solutions, such as in-home care, could be explored. However, this option may evoke feelings of dependence, similar to hospitalization, which Phyllis is likely to reject. Emotional intelligence is vital in navigating these discussions, as understanding and managing emotions can significantly improve outcomes.

Finding a Resolution

The final proposal might involve a contract allowing Phyllis to live independently, contingent on adherence to her medication regimen. This agreement offers Phyllis the opportunity to demonstrate responsibility while providing the hospital with necessary assurances. The personality and cognitive theories provide insight into Phyllis's behavior, emphasizing the importance of sensitive negotiation tactics. Phyllis's low self-esteem and negative perceptions of hospitalization require careful handling to avoid exacerbating her anxiety.

In conclusion, while various resolutions exist, a contract provides the most balanced solution. Should this fail, the Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA) of regular hospital check-ins remains viable. By aligning both parties’ interests, fostering positive relationships, and ensuring mutual gains, the interest-based approach offers a path to a successful resolution.

Reference: Barsky, A. E. (1999). Conflict Resolution for the Helping Professions: negotiation, mediation, advocacy, facilitation, and restorative justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Did you like this example?

493

26