The Social Construction of Illness

The construction of society is a complex tapestry interwoven with various social factors operating at different scales, both large and small. One significant element of this societal construct is illness, which is not merely defined by its clinical symptoms or the intuitive pathological understanding. Instead, illness is shaped within the social ideological sphere, acquiring extra derivative labels that are influenced by diverse cultural contexts, societal phenomena, and political situations. The influence, meaning, and modes of illness during this process should not be overlooked, as culture significantly impacts the experience and manifestation of illness across different societies by shaping differing understandings and attitudes towards it.

Pathological and Social Constructs

Initially, illness is constructed at a pathological level, where attention is primarily given to its symptoms, severity, life risk, and treatment costs, all driven by concerns for health. However, as anthropologist Arjun Appadurai suggested with his conception of "Scapes" in 1990, the understanding of illness transcends clinical symptoms, incorporating societal factors. Illness thus acquires a complex meaning, gradually becoming associated with certain social phenomena, specific groups, and cultural backgrounds. The construction of medical knowledge about illness and diseases is not inherently given by nature but is developed by claims-makers and interested parties. As noted by Peter and Barker (2010), illness is a social designation rather than an entirely natural product. This is exemplified in the historical stigma surrounding HIV/AIDS in China, where the illness was associated with improper sexual behavior, homosexuality, particularly among gay men, and foreign capitalism. Such associations resulted in AIDS becoming a shameful and unspeakable secret in Chinese society, reflecting broader societal prejudices.

China's Ministry of Health identified four main sources of HIV infection: imported blood products, foreigners, hospital infections, and prostitution, including homosexual activity. These sources were framed within a narrative that blamed capitalist influences, leading to a stigmatization of HIV patients as morally deviant. Consequently, AIDS became a distinct social symbol representing sexual deviance, Western capitalism, and homosexuality, leading to a lack of societal sympathy for affected individuals. This stigmatization is not unique to China; different societies assign various metaphorical connotations to illnesses, reflecting their ideological differences. Illness thus becomes a measure of personal identity, akin to education, family background, hobbies, and origin.

Illness Experience

The cultural context significantly influences the experience and manifestation of illness within societies, forming societal understanding and attitudes. In China, the conservative attitude towards sex, widespread fear of unknown diseases, and conflicting views on Western influences and homosexuality have compounded the stigmatization of AIDS. The government's inadequate response in disseminating accurate information about AIDS exacerbated public fear and misunderstanding. As Arthur (2011) highlights, this resulted in a "moral panic and crisis of trust" within Chinese society.

The social stigma attached to AIDS led many patients to conceal their condition for fear of losing their livelihoods. For example, a man named Haitian, who contracted HIV in 1999, faced significant personal and social challenges. Despite confessing his HIV status and gay identity to his wife, the couple chose not to divorce due to societal shame and fear of ridicule. This case exemplifies how societal labels, such as divorce and homosexuality, carry significant negative connotations in China, further complicating the experience of illness.

In some instances, such as in the villages of Henan province, individuals infected with HIV through blood transmission were more open about their condition, yet they received little understanding. Entire villages were socially isolated, and children of infected individuals faced educational disadvantages. This indicates how cultural perceptions of illness can lead to severe social consequences, highlighting the critical role of cultural context in shaping illness experiences.

Policies and Social Constructs

Social policies and cultural influences are mutually reinforcing, with illness experiences and manifestations reflected through policies. The definition of an illness as negative, based on social labels, affects societal attitudes and policy implications. In terms of social constructivism, the presentation of disease is not only about the patient and illness itself but is also an epitome of the entire society. Different metaphors of illness emerge from the inequitable structure of social construction, with stigmatization stemming from indifference and discrimination against minorities. Discrimination may originate from various factors such as gender, race, and sexual orientation, leading to societal exclusion.

Conclusion

In conclusion, illness is socially constructed as society endows it with additional connotations beyond its basic clinical characteristics. These connotations originate from different social contexts, cultural ideologies, and political environments. Culture plays a pivotal role in influencing the experience and manifestation of illness by shaping societal understanding and attitudes. The case of AIDS patients illustrates how cultural influences can impose shameful labels on social identities, reflecting society's understanding and attitudes toward certain groups. Ultimately, illness serves as a vehicle for examining social constructs and cultural ideologies, providing insight into how societies perceive and treat individuals based on their health conditions.

Did you like this example?

916

38