Ethical Dilemmas in Professional Settings

Ethical dilemmas, often referred to as moral quandaries, represent situations where individuals must make a choice between two conflicting options, neither of which resolves the situation in a morally satisfactory manner (Ethical Dilemma Examples, n.

Introduction

d.). These dilemmas are pervasive in professional environments, challenging individuals to weigh the potential harms and benefits of their decisions to determine the most ethically defensible course of action. In the case study of Harry, an innovative programmer, the narrative unfolds around a series of ethical dilemmas that not only affect him but also impact other key stakeholders in the organization.

This essay explores these dilemmas, focusing on the decision-making process of Brockley, the manager, and evaluates the ethical analysis that should guide his actions. By examining these intricate situations, the essay aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of ethical decision-making in organizational contexts.

Ethical Dilemma Analysis

In Harry's case, the primary ethical dilemma emerges when his program is rejected by Jill, the IT manager, who deems it too risky for the company. Faced with the decision to abandon his dream or bypass Jill’s authority by appealing to higher management, Harry opts for the latter. This decision leads to his dismissal, but his program gains traction among internet users, eventually catching the attention of Iris Bigg, the company's owner. Recognizing Harry's potential value, Bigg instructs Brockley, a manager who had previously supported Harry's termination, to rehire him. Brockley is now caught in a dilemma: he must choose between following Bigg’s directive, which would undermine his authority and that of Jill, or defy his employer’s order, risking his own job security.

Decision-Making Process

According to Craft (2013), making an ethical choice involves a structured four-step analysis and decision-making process, which enables individuals to navigate complex dilemmas effectively. This section outlines these steps in the context of Brockley’s situation.

Step 1: Understanding the Situation

The initial step requires a thorough comprehension of the circumstances and the identification of all stakeholders involved. In this case, Brockley’s predicament stems from his impulsive support of Jill’s decision to fire Harry without thoroughly evaluating the program's potential. The stakeholders in this scenario include Brockley, Jill, Harry, and Iris Bigg, each facing distinct consequences depending on Brockley’s decision. If Brockley complies with Bigg’s order, he risks damaging his credibility and Jill’s within the organization. Conversely, if he disobeys, he jeopardizes his position and the company’s potential gains from Harry’s program.

Step 2: Isolating the Major Ethical Dilemma

This step involves pinpointing the most significant ethical choice, despite its potential repercussions. The central dilemma revolves around whether Brockley should seek out Harry. While this decision may appear to undermine the authority of Brockley and Jill, it represents the least harmful option with potential benefits for all parties involved. By setting aside personal pride, Brockley can secure his job and comply with his superior’s instructions, demonstrating a pragmatic approach to conflict resolution.

Step 3: Ethical Analysis

Ethical analysis entails evaluating the implications of the decision identified in Step 2. Should Brockley choose to contact Harry, he and Jill may feel their initial judgment is devalued. This could strain their professional relationships, especially if Harry becomes aware of their earlier opposition. However, if he refrains from contacting Harry, the repercussions could be more severe: Brockley risks termination, the company could lose a valuable asset, and Harry may miss out on a lucrative opportunity. Therefore, the first option—contacting Harry—emerges as the least harmful and most beneficial, as the damage to Brockley’s and Jill’s egos is minimal compared to the potential losses for all stakeholders.

Step 4: Making a Decision

The final step involves executing a defensible ethical decision and devising a plan for its implementation (Spector, 2016). In this scenario, adhering to Bigg’s directive is the most defensible choice, given its minimal negative impact and substantial benefits. To implement this decision, Brockley should engage in open dialogue with Jill to understand her rationale for firing Harry. This conversation can not only mend their working relationship but also provide valuable insights into improving Harry’s program, ultimately benefiting the company.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ethical dilemmas in professional settings require careful navigation through structured decision-making processes. Brockley’s situation illustrates the complexities of balancing personal pride, professional responsibilities, and the broader implications of ethical choices. By adhering to a systematic approach, Brockley can make a decision that minimizes harm and maximizes benefits for all parties involved. This case underscores the importance of ethical decision-making frameworks, such as Kant’s categorical imperative, which advocates for actions that ensure justice and accountability. Ultimately, prioritizing transparency, open communication, and a willingness to reevaluate initial judgments can lead to more ethical and effective resolutions in organizational contexts.

Did you like this example?

1111

46