Lack of Education Due to Poverty

Introduction

Poverty is a pervasive social issue that affects millions across the globe, evolving and expanding over time. Despite being a rich nation, the United States harbors millions of residents living in poverty, thereby challenging common perceptions of wealth and prosperity. Since the 1960s, poverty has been recognized as a significant issue, affecting a large segment of the population, including vulnerable children. Childhood poverty is particularly concerning as it impacts not just the present but also the future of societies by influencing the psychological and biological development of children.

It permeates through various levels of social systems, namely the micro, mezzo, and macro levels. Despite ongoing research into poverty, generational poverty, and childhood poverty, meaningful changes to improve children's lives remain elusive. This essay explores the theories of social learning and attribution to understand childhood poverty, aiming to propose effective solutions to break the cycle of poverty for future generations.

Understanding Poverty: A Historical Context

To fathom the complexity of poverty, it is essential to delve into its historical context. The method of calculating poverty levels in the United States was established in the 1960s by Mollie Orshansky, who devised a model based on the cost of a basic, yet adequate diet. This model assumed that an average American household spends one-third of its income on food, and multiplied this by three to account for all family expenses. Although this model was comprehensive at the time, it has not kept pace with modern socio-economic changes, and remains largely unchanged. Critics argue that it fails to consider non-cash benefits like food stamps, school lunches, and Medicaid, which could significantly alter the poverty statistics. Thus, the current methodology might be overstating the extent of poverty in the United States.

Measuring Poverty: Absolute vs. Relative

Poverty is measured in two primary ways: absolute and relative. Absolute poverty refers to the inability to access life-sustaining essentials such as food, shelter, and healthcare. These standards remain consistent globally. For instance, a daily caloric intake of 2000 to 2500 is universally required for human sustenance. On the other hand, relative poverty assesses how income inequality affects different social groups. For example, a household in the United States with appliances may be deemed impoverished if its income falls below the poverty threshold, whereas, in other countries, such households might be considered affluent. This distinction underscores the complexity of poverty and the need for nuanced approaches in addressing it.

The Global and National Landscape of Poverty

In 2013, approximately 20% of the world's population lived in extreme poverty, surviving on less than $1.25 a day. In the United States, 46.2 million people fell into this category, marking the highest number recorded in recent history. The demographic patterns of poverty reveal significant links to race, ethnicity, age, gender, family structure, and disability. For instance, 27.2% of Black, 25.6% of Hispanic, 11.7% of Asian, and 9.7% of non-Hispanic populations were considered poor. Additionally, women, especially single mothers, are more likely to experience poverty than men. Individuals with disabilities also face a higher likelihood of living in poverty. Understanding these patterns is crucial for developing targeted interventions to combat poverty effectively.

Generational Poverty and Its Impacts

Generational poverty, where families have lived in poverty for two or more generations, presents unique challenges. Donna M. Beegle's study on college graduates from generational poverty backgrounds reveals feelings of shame, humiliation, and exclusion. These individuals face barriers in accessing education, employment, housing, and healthcare, perpetuating the cycle of poverty. Over the past five decades, children have been more susceptible to poverty than adults, with one in five children experiencing poverty compared to one in eight adults. The United States has higher child poverty rates than many developed nations, influenced by federal cuts in spending on children's services and education between 2012 and 2014.

Psychological and Social Theories of Poverty

Two theories offer insights into childhood poverty: social learning theory and attribution theory. Social learning theory suggests that children learn behaviors by observing and imitating their caregivers. From a young age, children model the actions and emotions of those around them, affecting their development and perpetuating poverty cycles. Attribution theory posits that children interpret social situations based on their understanding, influencing their emotional responses. In impoverished settings, children may perceive themselves as inferior, leading to low self-esteem and poor academic performance. Understanding these theories can guide interventions to disrupt the cycle of poverty.

Breaking the Cycle: Education and Policy Interventions

Education is a critical tool in breaking the cycle of poverty. Schools play a vital role in providing resources and support to children from impoverished backgrounds. Teachers can foster a positive learning environment, promoting diversity and addressing bullying to enhance self-esteem and motivation. At the macro level, government policies must prioritize high-quality early care and learning experiences for all children. By collaborating with educational institutions, the government can implement initiatives that promote economic mobility and reduce poverty rates.

Conclusion

Poverty is a complex, multifaceted issue that persists despite ongoing efforts to address it. By examining childhood poverty through the lenses of social learning and attribution theories, we can better understand its psychological and social implications. Addressing poverty requires a coordinated effort from individuals, families, communities, and governments. Through education and policy interventions, we can empower children to break free from the cycle of poverty and create a more equitable society for future generations.

Did you like this example?

461

24