Case for Reparations – Brown V. Board of Education

Exclusively available on PapersOwl
Updated: Mar 14, 2023
Cite this
Date added
Pages:  5
Order Original Essay

How it works

In 1896, the Plessy v. Ferguson court case, which allowed for the separation of blacks and whites in public areas, was a landmark case that set the stage for the treatment of African Americans. However, in 1954, the court case of the century was determined to overrule that. The Brown v. Board of Education will go down as one of the most iconic, life-changing court cases. The Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark case. The Supreme Court ruled that racial separation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.

Need a custom essay on the same topic?
Give us your paper requirements, choose a writer and we’ll deliver the highest-quality essay!
Order now

The court case was one of the milestones of the Civil Rights Movement and had a strong attitude towards the “separate but equal” education that Plessy v. Ferguson promised because it is essentially unequal. In this case, Brown alleges that black children’s school is not the same as the white children’s school. Racial segregation violates the 14th Amendment’s “equal protection clause.” In the history textbook The American Yawp, there is a primary source describing the Brown v. Board of Education case. In the primary source, they explain, “To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone” (1954). The separation of children based on their skin color, especially at such a young adolescent time in their lives, takes a huge toll on their minds. The only way to avoid such a terrible thing from happening is to integrate children of all race and colors and give them all the same opportunity as a white child would get in a public school.

Socioeconomic shortages are not dominant, and most members of society have reached a general economic level. John Kenneth Galbraith, the author of “The Affluent Society” in the “American Yawp,” describes the United States’ situation after World War II. The term explains the growing power of U.S. companies, the successes in producing new products, the ability to generate consumer demand through advertising, and the new growth in the United States.

Although consumer needs and demands were changing and the Brown v. Board of Education court case was successful, the view on African Americans was not. One of the most brutal beatings and one of the most well-known hate crimes is told in the textbook, “In the summer of 1955, two white men in Mississippi kidnapped and brutally murdered fourteen-year-old Emmett Till” (The American Yawp, 2018). Emmett Till’s body was beaten and disfigured so bad that it made national news. The two men who committed the crime were found not guilty.

Ta-Nehisi Coates, the author of “The Case for Reparations,” believes that the concept of compensation should play an important role in discussing American races. However, he did not demand a certain amount of taxpayer for each African American. It is impossible to figure out the amount of money that can cover centuries of slavery and abuse. Instead, Coates believes that the notion of compensation is important. Coates said the first problem was that many Americans did not understand the history of their country, the role of white superiority, and black repression in making that country current. The focus of this entry is that slavery was the most awful experience in the United States for blacks, and the direct victims of such an experience may receive the most compensation. This incident will bring up some special, difficult and interesting philosophical questions. As you can see, most of the situation is due to the fact that the injustice by blacks after liberation continues to do some damage to slaves. However, there is no reason to believe that these frauds themselves do not harm the victims, except for the continuing damage that causes slavery and that these damages may be worth some compensation.

In this essay, I critically assess some of the limitations of political liberalism and political philosophy. I do not intend to argue that African Americans have not right to compensation. In fact, the history of African American social existence in American society is an unimaginable pain, a historical situation that urgently demands justice. In this article, Coates studied the history of African Americans associated with slavery and oppression. This article discusses the experience of slavery, unfair laws, current issues, and compensation for damages. Coates explains, “Blacks were herded into the sights of unscrupulous lenders who took them for money and for sport” (Coates, 2014). The slave owners saw no wrong in what they were doing. They just wanted money and free labor.
In this case, there is a good reason to believe that slavery for black compensation may be more politically important. Slavery was not based on past traumatic events in the subsequent centuries. The argument for restoration is the relationship between American democracy and the white power of the modern era. The culture of racial discrimination in our country has closely linked the democratic bonds of economic slavery. The more accurate and accurate notes of the history of the United States have never been a hindrance to advances in the black race, showing black skinned lifestyles, jurisdictions, or political and legal barriers in every step of the way. The article is a great idea of how the need for compensation relates to the cruelty of slavery and the development of blacks in America after slavery. Coates claims that racial discrimination and compensation are based on unfairness for many Americans. In this way, he pointed out that he did not use any practical methods at the top of white dominance. The common problem of the United States is a discussion on rehabilitation and compensation. Compensation is punishable by a criminal offense. From an ethical point of view, reforms are more meaningful than compensations. It aims to be more profitable in society. There is no doubt that African Americans have been facing serious discrimination and fraud since the inception of the United States. Some African American communities are still enslaved, trying to rebuild African Americans from their freedom and their negative enslavement. Since then, the United States has been trying to correct this mistake through compensation. Due to the lack of relief for the suffering of African American communities, U.S. legal remedies have not succeeded in addressing personal and social injustice. The damage caused by slaves is still affected by the community. African Americans are depreciating under the United States’ legal system.

In the summer of 1959, Richard Nixon went to Moscow to officially open up the U.S. National Exhibition. The former Soviet Prime Minister, Nikita Khrushchev, accompanied Nixon to the exhibition. With the Cold War tensions easing up, the exhibition has enabled Americans and Soviets to explore each other’s culture and lifestyle. The so-called “kitchen debate,” which was a series of the advantages and disadvantages of the two leaders’ economic and political systems, discussion video between Nixon and Khrushchev won the domestic reputation of Richard Nixon as he clearly defended American living. However, both Nixon and Khrushchev were disappointed when they argued. They were interviewed on new color television and video technology. In the case of Nixon, the conference allowed U.S. technology, capitalism, and the high standard of living in the United States. He noted that the debates showed the significance of freedom of expression. Khrushchev’s exchange reminded him of how to develop the U.S. development and praise the communist system. The international attention received in the kitchen debate demonstrates that initiative and communication played an important part in the Cold War.

In “Richard Nixon on the American Standard of Living (1959),” he touches on the basis of racial discrimination. He says, “Another problem which causes us concern is that of racial discrimination in our country. We are making great progress in solving this problem, but we shall never be satisfied until we make the American ideal of equality of opportunity a reality for every citizen regardless of his race, creed or color” (Nixon, 1959). I agree with what Nixon is saying, we should never give up on making sure everyone is treated equally and given equal opportunities. As a future Social Worker, my goal is to advocate for people who are still being targeted for discrimination, and those who aren’t given the same equal opportunities as others. I feel as if slavery should have never been allowed or should have been abolished sooner. The repercussions for those affected by slavery will never go away. The worst part is, slavery is still happening right underneath our noses, especially in other countries. If slavery had been abolished sooner or if it had never even been a thing, I think racial discrimination against African Americans wouldn’t exist.

The deadline is too short to read someone else's essay
Hire a verified expert to write you a 100% Plagiarism-Free paper

Cite this page

Case for Reparations - Brown v. Board of Education. (2021, Jun 16). Retrieved from