Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois Compare and Contrast: Paths to Equality

Differing Paths to Equality: The Philosophies and Impact of Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois in Post-Reconstruction America

African Americans have ceaselessly battled with racial uniformity in America for a considerable length of time; nevertheless, with the assurance of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments,1867 through 1877 were the long stretches of remaking for blacks. Blacks were being chosen for political positions, casting a ballot, serving on juries, seeking training, and endeavoring to improve their monetary status. Be that as it may, white Southerners didn’t care for the possibility of African Americans having the equivalent rights as them.

They were resolved to keep blacks mistreated with another lifestyle, called Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws were laws that authorized the isolation of whites and blacks. This was a nadir for non-white individuals. In this season of misery, two accomplished men, Booker T. Washington and W.E.B DuBois, will offer proposals on the best way to increase racial, political, and monetary fairness. In spite of the fact that Washington and DuBois were both conceived at a similar time, achieved researchers, and racially blended in America, it was their disparities in foundation and strategy that would have the most effect on the black community. 

Booker T. Washington’s Approach: A Path to Racial Progress through Industrial Education and Accommodation of Segregation

Washington was naturally introduced to enslavement in Virginia. In the wake of being liberated, he worked in a salt mine and, in the end, chose to assist with his training at Hampton Institute. Washington proceeded to wind up a teacher just as a supporter of mechanical training. He felt that an ideal route for blacks to balance out their future was to make themselves a fundamental group of society by giving a need. Being that he was Southern, Washington could identify with the necessities of Southern blacks and the difficulty they encountered. In the discourse entitled, Atlanta Exposition, Washington tends to highly contrast Southers and white Northern. Booker T. Washington states, ‘We can be as sperate as the fingers, yet one as the submit everything fundamental to shared advancement.’ (Washington 6) He basically needs everybody to coincide yet, for the most part, endeavors to induce blacks to acknowledge separation until further notice by riding political power, social liberties, and advanced education. Rather, focus on hoisting themselves through diligent work of exchange. As rehashed in the discourse, he embeds, ‘Cast down your container!'(Washington 4) Washington needed blacks to surrender to isolation. Southern whites cherished Washington thought of blacks being peons. W.E.B DuBois can’t help contradicting Washington’s in an article where he investigates his position on equity.

Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois Similarities: Two Paths to Progress and the Struggle for Unity in a Complex Quest for Equality

DuBois was brought into the world of free dark in Massachusetts. He never needed to work any physical work employment, yet rather centered around his training. He contends that Washington’s recommendations for African Americans brought about a definitive disappointment of the Negro, the lawful inadequacy of this gathering, and the absence of help to dark schools and colleges. Rather than helping blacks succeed, Washington was further putting them into places of persecution. ‘Is it conceivable that men can gain viable ground in monetary lines in the event that they’re denied of political rights, made a servile position and permitted just the smallest shot for building up their excellent men?’ (DuBois 24) DuBois answers with a no. He feels just as Washington is being looked at with a logical inconsistency. At first, it would be troublesome for Negros to get spots of power in case they are denied the specifically to cast a tally. Thusly, political power and influence should remain basic. Moreover, if African-Americans continued enduring their circumstance in the open eye, it would be unfathomable for them to gather respect inside their own one-of-a-kind. This would similarly make it troublesome for outside social occasions to respect them, as well. Thirdly, while he requires the cutting-edge guidance of African Americans, he fails to refer that there is an inadequacy of enough arranged Negro teachers who may even have the ability to set up the new age.

Taking everything into account, though the men contrasted on how enhancements would happen, W.E.B DuBois and Booker T. Washington both wanted to see ethnic minorities advance their circumstances. The way to deal with equity is complex; neither Washington nor Dubois wasn’t right in what they accepted would be ideal. In any case, I feel just as the advancement would’ve moved quicker if the two men met up as one. Mollify to whites like Washington did, yet additionally recollecting that instruction and political power were similarly as vital as monetary exchange. With silence, there’s no advancement.

References

1. Washington, B. T. (1895). Atlanta Compromise Speech. Cotton States and International Exposition, Atlanta.
2. Washington, B. T. (1901). Up from Slavery. Doubleday, Page & Company.
3. DuBois, W. E. B. (1903). The Souls of Black Folk. A.C. McClurg.
4. DuBois, W. E. B. (1903). The Talented Tenth. The Negro Problem: A Series of Articles by Representative Negroes of To-day, 33-75.
5. Packard, J. M. (2009). American Nightmare: The History of Jim Crow. St. Martin’s Press.

Did you like this example?

343

14