Anaerobic Microbial Processes

Introduction

Despite the plethora of scientific literature focusing on how environmental parameters affect the microbial community structure, there is less emphasis on the reverse—how the microbial community structure influences the functionality, stability, and productivity of AD systems. Increasingly, it has become evident that understanding the microbial community within AD systems is crucial for achieving optimal operational efficiency (Demirel & Scherer, 2008). Recent advancements in technology have made it feasible to study the complex microbiological composition of bioreactors more comprehensively, making the development and maintenance of efficient digester microbial communities a significant research focus.

Microbial Processes

The transformation of organic waste into biogas within a bioreactor is facilitated by a complex microbial alliance, requiring four key stages: hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis. These stages are dependent on the presence of diverse microbial guilds of Bacteria and Archaea. Initially, hydrolytic bacteria break down complex carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids in the infeed waste, converting them into simpler monomers and amino acids. The taxonomy of bacteria involved in hydrolysis is largely dictated by the material's composition. Subsequently, acidogenic bacteria ferment these substrates into volatile fatty acids (VFAs), with acetate, propionate, and butyrate being the most common VFAs at this stage. Acetogenic bacteria then convert propionate, butyrate, and formate to acetate, producing H2 and CO2 in the process. Finally, hydrogenotrophic Archaea utilize the H2 produced in previous stages to generate methane.

Achieving balanced conditions for all bacterial alliances involved and ensuring equilibrium in their biochemical activities is essential for the successful digestion of organic waste and biogas production (Weiland, 2010). If this balance is disrupted and the digester lacks Bacteria and Archaea capable of filling the niches of the AD process, VFAs catabolization is hindered, halting methane production. Hence, it is crucial to study and predict the composition and interaction pathways between all involved parties in the process.

Advancements in Microbial Analysis

To determine the microbial community structure within the AD process, several methods have been developed. Historically, researchers relied on culture techniques to characterize methane-producing microorganisms. However, these traditional methods could describe only a small portion of the microbial composition due to demanding culture requirements. Syntrophic organisms present in the AD process pose even greater challenges, as reproducing a pure culture for description is impossible. Fortunately, advances in DNA sequencing technology have facilitated comprehensive analysis of AD microbial structures across all four stages of the process, providing insights into changes and composition in bioreactors (Levén et al., 2007).

The concept of the 'metagenome'—the collective genomes of microbes in an environmental sample—has been pivotal in this research. Metagenomics aims to study uncultured organisms to understand the true diversity, functions, and cooperation within collective microbiological communities found in various environments, including soil, water, and anaerobic digesters (Handelsman et al., 1998). With current technology, samples from AD environments can be directly sequenced, allowing for the entire communities to be analyzed without isolating and culturing distinct organisms.

Research into enhancing the output and capacity of anaerobic digesters is increasingly focused on microbial community characterization and monitoring, with technologies like Illumina/Solexa leading the way. These technologies offer more sequenced data than conventional methods like Sanger sequencing and avoid biases associated with DNA cloning (St-Pierre & Wright, 2013). Illumina technology excels in 16S rRNA gene sequencing, surpassing previous technologies due to its lower costs, higher accuracy, and greater throughput (Sinclair et al., 2015). This makes it a powerful tool for describing the metagenome of anaerobic digesters in both laboratory and industrial settings, with the potential to maximize biogas outputs and stability in future systems.

Did you like this example?

897

37