Type of Consumer Behavior

The topic of this paper will be minimalism, specifically minimalism as a movement in which people find meaning in life by consuming less and more responsibly. Minimalism challenges excessive consumption and unethical practices within capitalism. On an individual level, minimalism encourages consumers to think rationally and critically about their own purchases. Additionally, minimalism is often seen as a way to achieve happiness by decluttering and returning to important personal values. Many other terms have been proposed to define this type of consumer behavior besides minimalism, such as voluntary simplicity, ethical consumption, anti-consumption, and downshifting.

These terms share many similarities with minimalism and it has been suggested that minimalism is a similar idea to voluntary simplicity, but rebranded for the media.

As a social group, minimalists pose a threat to retailers and their current marketing strategies. Marketing strategies that target impulsive buying may no longer be effective with consumers who subscribe to a minimalist lifestyle. Furthermore, minimalism may be appropriated by consumer culture and marketed to people as a lifestyle available for purchase. A minimalist style is already being advertised across many mediums, including fashion, art, and home design. In order to gain a better understanding of how minimalism and consumer culture influence each other, it is necessary to examine minimalist practices and their presence in the media.

This paper will use Veblen’s theory on conspicuous consumption as a framework to understanding minimalism. Veblen defines conspicuous consumption as wasteful behaviors and excessive purchases of unnecessary goods. At the turn of the 19th century, society saw the rise of a new leisure class in which more people were able to consume luxury goods. In this society, people’s ostentatious displays of wealth are used in competition with one another. Veblen’s theory on conspicuous consumption seems at first glance to be the antithesis of minimalism and its principles. Conspicuous consumption, by definition, is wasteful, and minimalism rejects wasteful and excessive consumption. However, upon further examination, minimalism does contain many wasteful and ostentatious qualities.

Through the process of becoming a minimalist, one has to get rid of all items that do not serve a purpose in their lives. While minimalists may donate some items, this process inevitably creates waste as people discard the items they no longer use instead of finding a purpose for them. The discarded items may end up in landfills never to be used again. Minimalism also often requires people to purchase new items that are of higher quality, thereby replacing older items. While minimalists may limit their consumption, they continue to seek out quality, long-lasting, often expensive items.

Critiques of minimalism argue that it is only for the middle and upper classes, as those in poverty cannot afford to replace or part with the possessions they already own. Veblen writes, “No merit would accrue from the consumption of the bare necessities of life, except by comparison with the abjectly poor who fall short even of the subsistence minimum...” According to Veblen, those who only consume the necessities are not engaging in conspicuous consumption. However, when minimalists are compared to those that are truly impoverished, perhaps they can be seen as conspicuous consumers. Minimalists are wasteful relative to when they are compared to the poor who can barely meet their needs. Not only was a minimalist able to meet all of their needs, but they were also able to give away the goods they deemed unnecessary.

Veblen discusses the impact of tastes as being created by elites and passed down to lower classes. Minimalism may be a taste that is cultivated among the wealthiest classes and is now being marketed to other classes. For instance, many high-profile people have subscribed to the idea of minimalism, such as Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg. High-profile people hold considerable influence over the media and market.

Veblen also addresses the ways in which people compare themselves in the leisure class as invidious comparison. Veblen writes that comparison exists beyond just monetary wealth and can exist “in various directions in the manifestation of moral, physical, intellectual, aesthetic force”. Minimalism is often associated with other practices such as vegetarianism/veganism, being environmentally conscious, and spirituality/religion. A display of invidious comparison could exist between minimalists and other consumers, as minimalists may represent a moral lifestyle that others wish to attain.

Dopierala describes minimalism as a new mode of consumption known as conscious consumption, and also as a style of consumption (2017). This source provides a background of minimalism and the controversy that surrounds the discipline. Minimalism is characterized in many ways such as a therapy, marketing trend, or anti-consumerist spirituality. Minimalism has also been framed as having fewer products of higher quality, and another way of satisfying needs besides consumption.

Ramchandani & Coste-Maniere differentiate between eco-conspicuous consumers and eco-conscious consumers (2018). The motivations differ between these two groups, as eco-conscious consumers make decisions in order to support the environment, while eco-conspicuous consumers are interested in the social appearance of supporting the environment. The social appearance of being environmentally friendly or making ethical choices may result in desired status or prestige. Malcolm Gladwell uncovers the science that retailers use to observe the buying habits of consumers.

In his interviews with Paco Underhill, he describes the various ways retailers increase their profits by creating environments in which people buy. For those who are buying less, like minimalists, have they escaped the overwhelming power of retail psychology? It is unclear whether minimalists are exceptions to these rules. Through Underhill’s many hours of observations, he notes that some consumers do walk out of stores empty-handed. It is unclear if these people, who abstain from making purchases, share similarities such as being a minimalist. Gladwell concludes that the consumer is always changing, and so must the strategies used by retailers. Retail companies may now appeal to this specific consumer group, which aims to consume less, by advertising differently.

The case study I will investigate is aesthetic minimalism. I am investigating the ways in which minimalism can still be “sold” to consumers through different formats. Beyond the minimalism's spirituality, it is presented as a fashion and design style that a person can buy. I will consult clothing websites, blogs, and YouTube videos, as well as several non-academic readings that provide critical views on minimalism. Are minimalists immune to the power of retail psychology? How do retailers already target shoppers who might identify as minimalist?

In order to answer these questions, I will reference articles in which people have already examined websites such as personalized subscription-based companies (Stitch Fix) and ethical clothing retailers (Everlane), and their attempts to “sell” minimalism (Citation). Does aesthetic minimalism separate from minimalism as a belief system? Is minimalism anti-consumption or a different method of consumption altogether? I hope to answer this question by examining YouTube videos and blogs run by self-proclaimed minimalists. Embedded within these videos and blog posts, minimalists often promote their routines and habits, sometimes recommending products to buy. Additionally, people who consider themselves to be minimalists may also subscribe to a minimalist aesthetic and display this aesthetic in their homes and clothes. This would be apparent on blogs and YouTube videos.

Did you like this example?

253

13