The Stolen Party Character Analysis
This essay will provide a character analysis of the protagonist in Liliana Heker’s short story “The Stolen Party.” It will explore the character’s development, her interactions with other characters, and how these reveal class divisions and social dynamics. The piece will analyze the story’s central themes, such as innocence, social inequality, and the loss of childhood naivety, as experienced by the protagonist. Also at PapersOwl you can find more free essay examples related to American Literature.
How it works
In the story ‘The Stolen Party’, Rosaura, the hero, is a youthful innocent young lady who accepts and believes that all individuals are acceptable. Her mom accepts that all rich individuals are liars and they are substandard compared to them. She feels that her girl won’t be viewed as equivalents. Regardless of her mom’s judgment, Rosaura keeps on investing a large portion of her energy attempting to persuade her mom, just as everybody at the gathering, that being an informed young lady makes her an equivalent to everybody at the gathering. Rosaura accepts that she is welcome to the gathering since she and Luciana are companions. They hobnob. Each evening, they get their work done, savor tea the kitchen and disclose to one another privileged insights. Investing all that energy with Luciana gives Rosaura enough motivation to expect that they are companions. Her mom reveals to her that she isn’t Luciana’s companion, however simply the house keeper’s little girl. At the gathering, Rosaura helps Sefiora Ines, Luciana’s mom, by serving at the gathering. Rosaura accepts that Sefiora Ines is requesting that she help since she is trustworthy and knows the house better compared to any other person at the gathering. She feels like she is fitting in Luciana’s way of life and not being passed judgment on dependent on her economic wellbeing, until she is cruelly taken back to the real world and appearances the situation of being substandard compared to rich individuals. Toward the finish of the gathering, Sefiora Ines passes out plunder packs to every one of the youngsters and Rosaura even expected that she may get 2 for aiding such a huge amount at the gathering. Be that as it may, Sefiora Ines didn’t give her any plunder packs and rather gave her 2 bills from her tote. She said “you really acquired this [… ] thank you for all your assistance, my pet” (Heker 4). The blameless Rosaura was stunned when she found that her mom was correct from the start. Rich individuals can never regard destitute individuals as their companions, just as their second rate. “Rosaura felt her arms solidify, stick near her body, and afterward she saw her mom’s hand on her shoulder. Intuitively, she squeezed herself against her mom’s body. That was all. But her eyes. Rosaura’s eye had a chilly, clear look that fixed itself on Sefiora Ines’ face” (Heker 4). Her fantasies and her blamelessness were broken by her credulous reasoning that she won’t be passed judgment on dependent on her social class just as Sefiora Ines’ treatment towards Rosaura.
Also, in the story “The Fall of the City,” Teddy, the hero’s guiltlessness was annihilated by his own naivety when he accepted that he could live in his conjured up universe for eternity. “In the focal point of the room stood a fortress and a royal residence, carefully built from ridged cardboard containers” (Nowlan 1). He made his own castle and armed force out of cardboard boxes where he was the authority; he controlled everything in his reality, and he didn’t have anything to stress over. In any case, one day when his uncle discovered that Teddy was playing with paper dolls, he continually embarrassed him. His uncle had a cliché see on sexual orientation parts, in which he accepts that kid’s ought not be playing with dolls, as it was something female to do. At the point when Teddy plays unobtrusively, his uncle consequently accepts that he is stumbling into difficulty and humiliates him. What Teddy had envisioned and made for himself couldn’t stay aware of the real world. “There was no ruler Theodore, no Emperor Kang, no Theodoresburg, no Upalia, no Danova. There was just a loft brimming with absurd cardboard structures and silly paper individuals” (Nowlan 3). He could at this point don’t feel the enchantment that he once felt playing with his castle. At the point when he went to the loft, “the city was as he had left it. However everything had changed. Continuously before when we had come there, his tissue has shivered, his eyes had shone with fervor. Presently there was just a taste like that of a ruin nutmeat” (Nowlan 3). He was continually scorned and let somewhere around the grown-ups in his life, for the most part his uncle, which brought about him tearing and annihilated his own cardboard royal residence which at last lead to the obliteration of his guiltlessness. In the two stories, the creators showed that the two youngsters’ naivety and the grown-up’s job in every story brought about them being deceived and frustrated.
How it works
In the two stories, the hero is searching for endorsement from their general public and in every story, there are various generalizations. In ‘The Stolen Party’ Rosaura needed endorsement from the higher class society and the help from her mom to accept that not all rich individuals are terrible. Eventually, Rosaura will not acknowledge change, and accept that all individuals are terrible, yet discovers that conversely, in ‘The fall of the City’, Teddy is searching for endorsement from his uncle. His uncle had a cliché see on sex parts, in which he accepts that kid’s ought not be playing with dolls, as it was something female to do.