Indigenous Persecution in American History

Introduction

Throughout the annals of American history, the narrative of Native Americans and their interactions with European settlers is one marked by tragedy and betrayal. The film adaptation of Dee Brown's seminal work, "Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee," serves as a poignant depiction of one such chapter, focusing on the Sioux tribe's struggles. The movie brings to light the harsh realities faced by Native Americans due to the unfair treatment by American settlers, particularly through broken treaties and exploitative policies like the Dawes Act.

This essay seeks to analyze the historical context of the film, its accuracy in portraying these events, and the broader implications of such historical injustices.

Historical Context

The film opens with the Battle of Little Bighorn, a significant conflict between the Sioux and American forces. The battle was not merely a military confrontation but a manifestation of the systemic injustices faced by Native tribes. The American settlers, driven by greed and the myth of Manifest Destiny, sought to exploit the rumored gold in the Black Hills, disregarding the sacredness of the land to the Sioux people. Lieutenant Colonel George Armstrong Custer's defeat at the hands of the Sioux was a rare moment of triumph for the Native Americans, yet it spurred further aggression from the U.S. government, leading to policies aimed at subjugating and assimilating the Native population.

The Dawes Act and Its Implications

Central to the film’s portrayal of injustice is the Dawes Act, a legislative measure ostensibly designed to integrate Native Americans into American society. The Act promised to allot land to Native families, but in reality, it fragmented tribal lands and aimed to dismantle communal living, a cornerstone of Native American culture. The film accurately depicts the Sioux's resistance to the Dawes Act, highlighting their understanding that the proposed land allotments were insufficient to sustain their way of life. As shown through the character of Charles Eastman, a Sioux who becomes a mediator between his people and the American government, the Act was an exercise in cultural imperialism, cloaked in the guise of benevolent assimilation.

Cultural and Personal Struggles

The film delves deeply into the personal struggles of individuals caught in the crossfire of cultural conflict. Charles Eastman, initially taken from his tribe and educated in a white settlement, represents the duality faced by many Native Americans. Torn between his heritage and the pressure to conform to Western norms, Eastman's journey is emblematic of the broader struggle for identity among Native peoples. His eventual disillusionment with the American government's policies underscores the failure of such measures to truly respect and integrate Native cultures.

The Move to Canada

The film also portrays Sitting Bull's decision to lead his people north to Canada, seeking refuge from relentless American aggression. While the movie does not fully explore the Canadian government's eventual hostility, it does capture Sitting Bull's pride and resilience. His return to the United States, driven by starvation and the lack of Canadian support, reflects the dire circumstances faced by the Sioux. The film's omission of certain historical details, such as the burning of buffalo grass by American hunters to cut off food supplies, slightly detracts from its overall historical accuracy but does not diminish its emotional impact.

Conclusion

"Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee" serves as a significant reminder of the injustices faced by Native Americans at the hands of American settlers and the U.S. government. The film's portrayal of events surrounding the Dawes Act highlights the cultural and personal turmoil experienced by the Sioux and other tribes. While the movie takes some creative liberties, it effectively conveys the broader narrative of resistance and resilience in the face of systemic oppression. The legacy of these events, symbolized by the Dawes Act, remains a scar on Native American history, underscoring the need for continued reflection and reconciliation. Through a nuanced and empathetic portrayal, the film invites viewers to confront these uncomfortable truths and consider their lasting implications on contemporary society.

Did you like this example?

1293

68