The Assassination of William McKinley: Motivations and Implications

On September 6, 1901, William McKinley, the 25th President of the United States, was shot while in Buffalo, New York, for the Pan-American Exposition. His passing on September 14, 1901, exposed the severe socio-political tensions of the day and signaled a dramatic change in the political climate of the nation. An analysis of the anarchist movement, Czolgosz’s personal motivations, and the larger societal challenges at hand is necessary to completely understand the causes behind McKinley’s killing.

Widespread industrialization and extreme economic inequality characterized the late 19th and early 20th centuries in the United States.

The industrial capitalist system grew quickly, creating enormous wealth inequality for the majority of people and powerful monopolies and trusts that were thought to control the government and economy. The harsh working conditions, long hours, and low wages faced by workers contributed to the growing discontent that gave rise to labor movements and radical political ideologies such as anarchism.

Anarchism, which calls for the elimination of hierarchical authority and the creation of a stateless society, became popular among people who felt marginalized and oppressed by the status quo. Leon Czolgosz was one such person. Born in 1873 to Polish immigrants, Czolgosz witnessed firsthand the hardships of working-class life, working in several factories where he saw laborers exploited and subjected to harsh conditions. Czolgosz became increasingly radicalized after becoming disillusioned with the glaring injustices and drawing inspiration from well-known anarchists like Emma Goldman.

Radicals viewed McKinley as a supporter of big business and imperialism during his presidency. They also saw his administration’s policies—such as the protective tariffs and the annexation of territories following the Spanish-American War—as further solidifying the dominance of the wealthy elite and advancing American imperialism. Anarchists like as Czolgosz viewed McKinley’s murder as a way to overthrow the established order and start a broader revolution.

On September 6, 1901, at a public banquet at the Pan-American Exposition, Czolgosz approached McKinley, who was concealing a handgun inside a handkerchief. He then shot the president twice in the belly. Although McKinley appeared to be recovering, diseases linked to gangrene took his life eight days later. The nation was shocked by the assassination, which led the authorities to tighten down on radical groups like anarchists.

A new era of progressive reforms aimed at taming the excesses of industrial capitalism and addressing social injustices was ushered in by Theodore Roosevelt, McKinley’s vice president, whose assassination had far-reaching consequences. His assassination also sparked a national debate on security and the protection of public figures, leading to increased measures to safeguard the president and other officials.

A reaction against radicalism and anarchism in general was also sparked by the occurrence. Because anarchists were portrayed by the government and media as a major threat to national security, there was an increase in surveillance and a crackdown on radical political activity. Following McKinley’s passing, radicals who were born overseas were deported and stricter laws targeting anarchists were enacted, further marginalizing these movements.

In conclusion, a complex interplay of personal grievances, radical ideology, and socioeconomic conditions led to William McKinley’s assassination. Czolgosz’s actions reflected the broader discontent and frustration of many who felt oppressed by the system in place. McKinley’s death marked a turning point in American history that resulted in profound political and social changes. Gaining an understanding of the assassination’s motivations can help us better understand the turbulent dynamics of the era and the long-lasting effects of radical political movements on the history of the country.

Did you like this example?

238

13