A major issue in society today is the topic of stricter gun laws and it creates many different controversies. The Second Amendment of the constitution allows citizens the right to keep and bear Arms, so why are people raging about the opposing views of others? Globally, people are debating on whether or not guns should be so easily accessed. According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, over 50 percent of murders occur in 2 percent of the nation’s counties.
Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Stricter Gun Laws" essay for youCreate order
With the amount of gun related crimes, it is not hard to tell why some individuals oppose persons to effortlessly purchase a firearm. Guns have been involved in many unfortunate events, various have happened in the past and are even still very common today. Earlier this year, on February 14th a man by the name of Nikolas Cruz went into Stoneman Douglas High School and shot 17 persons, forlorn, all individuals have passed away. Stricter gun laws can have a positive effect on society, if stricter gun laws are enforced, society will be much safer. Gun officials should have stricter gun laws because of the increased school shootings, to decrease death rates, and guns are to easily accessible to everyone.
School shootings have been unfortunately growing in numbers over the years. Gun laws should in fact be harsher. Everyday information with gun violence is being seen around the internet. Shooting in public spaces, schools, killing and suicide are only some of various types of gun violence. Shooting and killing any individual is a huge topic in the world and several different comments are offered about this. Is that the time when the opinions of gun shifts? Since this fateful shot of 17 students and faculty members final month and Marjory Stoneman Douglas senior high school, at Park, Florida, proponents of stricter weapon forces have been taking that question, with the wary hopefulness of people who, time and again, have seen such turning point lead nowhere. The time does not seem different though mostly because the teenage survivors of the Parkland shooting have commanded the public theater with their natural and moral anger. Gun control laws will make schools and America safer. Places where guns are not allowed are mostly the places where all the shootings happen, for instance, concerts, churches, and schools. These places are typically the most targeted, their victims are most likely unarmed, and defenseless. The most common term proposal to prevent school shootings is gun regulation. Some school shootings require this usage of military level weapons that are either traded or available to young people. Limiting the acquisition of such weapons tends to take the most debatable idea since fervent Second statement sponsors and organizations, (National Rifle Association) etc. Gun regulations should be harsher because it is too easily accessible to not only people of the age requirement, but people well under the requirement are getting ahold of these weapons and it is becoming way too common. If the Second Amendment allows people to own a gun (as long as they meet age requirement), they why are school shootings so regular? At the age of 21, an individual can purchase any firearm for example, a pistol, or semi automatic, and at the age of 18, an individual is granted access to only purchase a weapon for example, a shotgun. Why can a 18 year old be able to purchase a shotgun over a handgun? Government officials should take into consideration that many gun related crimes are happening today, and it would be wiser if the age requirement for purchasing a gun is higher. According to, www.springer.com , school shootings have been steadily increasing since 1979. Overall, the death toll from mass school shootings was 12 in the 1980s and 36 in the 1990s, and is still rising today. Officials should take this type of information into consideration, gun regulations need to be increased and stricter, American children are dying everyday because of the ease of purchasing or even just getting ahold of a firearm. Additionally, to any state that has their own laws to regulate firearms and federal gun laws, the right to keep and bear arms is grounded by the second amendment to the U.S Constitution. Mass shootings in the U.S has started public debate about gun control laws, however, when these mass shootings occur, there is always a call for stronger gun laws. Urban schools are typically where guns are most easily accessible. For example, Chicago has most of the strictest gun laws in the country however still manages to have some of the highest murder rates. Whether guns are legal or not in Chicago, there are still numerous firearms lingering in the hands of criminals.When a shooting has occurred, gun control is suddenly a main topic, not surprisingly. People will want to have regulations by increasing background checks, and closing loopholes in gun laws and banning weapons. We have witnessed many gun related murders and as mentioned previously there has been a rise in mass shootings throughout the years, if you were to observe statistics on gun control laws and murder rates, there will be no correlation. Gun laws need to be harsher on every individual because if they are not controlled, criminals will continue to intrude and continue to commit school shootings.
Given that gun laws need to be enforced in order to limit school shootings, stricter gun laws should also be enforced in order to decrease death rates. According to www.statistics.com, …the presence of guns in the home increased an individual’s risk of death by homicides by 90 percent. Even if you give a good guy a firearm, their chance of surviving isn’t even risen by being protected, it’s actually decreased. Likewise, when an individual uses a gun to present self-defense, there is no obvious way to lessen or reduce their chance of being hurt. Moreover, individuals who were in possession of a gun were about 4.5 times more likely to be shot in an assault than those not in possession (Do Gun Laws Work? 1). Although some may believe that giving a good person a gun will help to eliminate the chance of gun violence being accumulated, it is best to have harsher gun laws that way it is more difficult for criminals to obtain a firearm. Doing background checks and having an age requirement to own a gun will not prevent gun violence at all. As an example, the age to own a firearm is 21 and Nicolas Cruz was 20 years old when he shot and killed the students in Parkland with an AR-15. An AR-15 is a a weapon Cruz should not even have been able to withhold because he is underage (to own this type of weapon). As mentioned in the U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, The United States goes through many epidemic levels of gun violence, over 30,000 lives are lost yearly […] for every person who dies from a gunshot wound, two others are wounded and every year about 100,000 Americans are victims of gun violence. Gun related deaths are only expanding and only stricter laws will help to lower the rates. Government officials can enforce stricter gun laws by not eliminating the prior regulations, but altering them instead. For instance, background checks: instead of the elimination of background checks they can be stricter; for example, officials can change the policy to NO felonies or NO arrests of any kind, completely, in order to purchase a weapon. They can also regulate the denial of any individual if they have not had a gun permit for a minimum of X amount of time. This way, it will be much harder for an individual (of any kind) to purchase a firearm. If government officials use this approach, the number of death rates do to gun violence will significantly decrease. According to www.everytownresearch.org, Approximately one-third of gun deaths in America are homicides, and just the access alone to a firearm increases the risk of death by two times. America fails to realize that allowing more guns is equivalent to allowing more deaths. Black Americans constitute the age of gun killing victims. As mentioned in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, African Americans exist ten times more likely than white Americans to suffer from the wounds of firearms. Firearms represent the 2nd major cause of death of American kids and adolescents, and the primary major cause of death for colored kids and teens. With the number of deaths only related to firearms, harsher regulations on guns should definitely be revised and enforced. In states like AL, AK, and Louisiana, were shooters existing are governed, this change of dying by fire arms equals further than four minutes higher than at New York, Connecticut, Hawaii, or Massachusetts, which have some of the strictest gun laws in the country. Investigators have theorized on potential exclamations. Individual research, for instance, has indicated that gun related suicide or higher in rule areas rates of shot death in agricultural states may remain higher because the levels in having medical care would result in higher morbidity rate from gun related injuries. Guns are harmful to everyone and should be extremely limited. How will there be mass shootings if there are no guns to start with? The ability to access a firearm should be more laborious in order to help decrease high and increasing death rates.
Many dispute over the fact that government officials should not have tougher gun laws. For example, if you take away guns or make them harder to obtain then it would be much more difficult for a good guy to help the public. Their idea towards not having stricter gun laws is, the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good person with a gun. Some may argue that having stricter gun laws will make it harder for a good guy to own a gun, but many oppose. If government officials have stricter gun laws, why would it be much harder for a good guy to purchase a firearm? If a good guy is really a good guy, then why would it be a hassle to be given background checks and other forms of actions necessary in order to obtain a firearm? An honorable American citizen would not have to worry about having to go through a harder process in order to have a gun because they would easily be granted access because of their clean records, assumingly.
Gun regulations should be much stricter because it would have such a more positive effect on society. As mentioned previously, with the amount of deaths and mass shootings rising day by day, it is only wise to not only attempt but to enforce stricter gun laws. If gun regulations were not only monitored, but enforced, society would not always have to keep their guard up when it comes to gun safety. Children and even adults themselves would be able to have a peace of mind and would not have to always be thinking about the What if’s.. and could be able to simply do their daily jobs with ease. The Human firearms Act of 1934 was ratified by chairman Franklin D. Roosevelt after high-profile gangland offenses, including this St. Valentines Time Murder at 1929 that left seven dead in Chicago. Even back then weapons were an issue and Presidents and government officials attempted to fix the issue, then why are these events still taking place today? Majority of people support gun control but the real issue is getting it to actually be enforced. There is a vase difference between having a law in place and actually enforcing a law, society today needs to enforce gun laws rather than speaking on how bad society is becoming with guns in the hands of criminals. The world would be a much safer place if gun regulations were enforced.
There are many different source choices for people to buy guns. Individual merchant will usually transport within their own government (sales) without making a background check. To send to another government, they would have to take the licensed vendor as an intermediary. In those instances, the seller must do a background check, as authorized dealers usually have to do the background check on and off-line. According to the 2015 office of alcohol tobacco firearms and explosives, Internet has greatly provided Sauris choices for people to buy guns. Individual merchant will usually transport within their own government without making a background check. To send to another government, they would have to take the licensed vendor as an intermediary. In those instances, the seller must do a background check, as authorized dealers usually have to do the background check on and offline. According to the 2015 office of alcohol tobacco firearms and explosives account there are more than 55,000 authorized weapon traders, this includes everything from tiny privately owned a gun stores in sporting good stores to large change jobs that hold guns like Walmart. Additionally, there exists more than 8,000 pawn stores that are certified to trade and sell guns, according to this ATF. Authorize gun vendors and even pawn stores are mandated by national police to perform background checks when dealing with guns and selling them to customers. But not every gun buyer adheres to the gun shop way, and in the number of states, firing vendors that are not licensed won’t be needed to do the background check, according to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Almost every time a school shooter commits a crime, they are labeled with a mental disability. If shooters are so called mentally disturbed and how are they able to purchase their weapons? Many mass shooters today are shockingly very young and range from teens to usually just early adults. How are these criminals able to own their firearms? Legally owned guns are frequently stolen and used by criminals. Gun regulations should in fact be much harsh because they are too easily accessible to everyone.
A June 2013 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report states that “[a]almost all guns used in criminal acts enter circulation via initial legal transaction.”  Between 2005 and 2010, 1.4 million guns were stolen from US homes during property crimes (including burglary and car theft), a yearly average of 232,400.  Ian Ayres, JD, PhD, and John J. Donohue, JD, PhD, Professors of Law at Yale Law School and Stanford Law School respectively, state, “with guns being a product that can be easily carried away and quickly sold at a relatively high fraction of the initial cost, the presence of more guns can actually serve as a stimulus to burglary and theft (The Surprising way Gun violence is dividing America 1).
The Second amendments grants persons to own a firearm, and there are some restrictions out today that can help prevent criminals from obtaining a gun; but what good is it if the criminal can and will most likely just steal a firearm if they know they are not of age or meet the requirements to own one? America needs a well grounded and solid system to ensure the safety of its citizens. If citizens are constantly worrying about their safety then what good are the laws set in place to supposably protect them? The principle behind gun regulation is simple”the fewer guns at people’s hands, that lesser chances for gun violence and fatalities to happen. This purpose is harm reduction, not the destruction of killing and aggression altogether. This is never going to happen. Gun power is about making certain guns do not go into the wrong hands. That means things like general background checks, determining the types of guns that world has access to and other common-sense rules. After 35 people died at the Port Arthur Murder, Country banned specific semi automatic and mechanical weapons. Australians are still allowed to have guns if they take the appropriate licenses and have the reason for having these weapons besides physical security.
Gun regulations should all together be much harsher on individuals because of the increased school shootings currently, to decrease death rates, and because they are far too easily accessible to any individual. Gun laws should not only be regulated, but refined as well as enforced to ensure the safety of American citizens. Everyday many innocent lives are lost due to the selfishness and carelessness of others, enforcing stricter gun laws is only the least government official can do for their citizens. Having limited guns can and will save lives, and a safer America starts simply by implementing stronger laws.
We will send an essay sample to you in 2 Hours. If you need help faster you can always use our custom writing service.Get help with my paper