Performance Enhancement in Professional Sports

Many individuals hold athletes in high regard, often seeing them as role models due to their impressive skills, speed, strength, and the glory they achieve through sports. What many fans might not realize is the significant possibility that some of these admired traits could be enhanced by the use of steroids or other performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs). As the debate intensifies over whether PEDs should be accepted in sports, this essay will explore why athletes choose to use these drugs, the potential harm they cause to otherwise healthy bodies, and the broader argument surrounding their acceptance in competitive sports.

Types of Performance-Enhancing Drugs

Margaret Alic, in her article "Performance-Enhancing Drugs," elucidates that steroids can be either naturally occurring or synthetically produced. These substances fall into categories such as recreational, restorative, and additive, the latter being classified as performance-enhancing drugs (Alic). It’s crucial to note that not all PEDs are harmful; some might even have therapeutic uses. Thus, there is a need to categorize these substances appropriately. Matt Barnard, in another illuminating article, lists some of the most prevalent PEDs in sports today, including human growth hormone (HGH), erythropoietin (EPO), beta-2 agonists, stimulants, diuretics, and creatine (Barnard). These drugs often go by various names to elude detection during sales, whether in pharmacies or through illegal channels. Barnard emphasizes that a drug is banned if it meets two of the following criteria: it has the potential to enhance performance, poses potential health risks, or violates the spirit of the sport.

The modes of administration for these substances vary; they can be ingested orally as pills, absorbed transdermally through the skin, or injected directly into the bloodstream. Originally, these drugs were manufactured in Europe for non-sport-related purposes, such as promoting overall health and nutrition. In the context of athletics, they help the body achieve peak strength and energy levels while minimizing muscle damage (Barnard).

The Impact of Drug Testing

Drug testing can significantly tarnish an athlete's reputation if results indicate the presence of PEDs. Barnard notes that athletes are routinely screened for anabolic steroids (AAS), with tests capable of detecting these substances in blood and urine samples (Barnard). Some argue that such testing infringes on athletes' privacy (Alic). There's a contingent that believes athletes should have the autonomy to decide whether to use PEDs, including the dosage and timing, ideally in consultation with healthcare providers (Jenkins). Despite knowing the long-term detrimental effects on their bodies, many athletes persist with PED use, driven by the relentless pursuit of peak performance and victory (Lavin). Often, they consume double the recommended dosages and concoct their own drug combinations to enhance their capabilities (Barnard).

The Ethical Debate

A significant portion of the public advocates for the outright ban of PEDs in sports due to the skewed competition results they produce. Michelle Verroken poses a compelling question: "If a safe performance-enhancing drug improved everybody’s performance to the same extent, what would be the point of taking it?" (“Sports”). The core issue is that PEDs allow athletes to compete at levels deemed unfair, as they involve the use of illicit substances to gain an edge. The argument follows that if a select few have access to these drugs, then all athletes should, to ensure a level playing field (Alic). If PEDs were legalized, athletes might feel compelled to use them just to maintain parity, given that everyone else would be doing so (Jenkins). The stakes in sports are incredibly high, with success often prioritized above all else, leading coaches and sponsors to pressure athletes into using any means necessary, legal or not, to secure victory. The constant elevation of expectations in competitive sports further exacerbates this pressure (“Sports”).

Health Risks and Societal Impact

The physical transformations induced by PEDs are noticeable. Men may develop characteristics typical of women, and vice versa, alongside other common side effects (Barnard). Barnard highlights the widespread use of testosterone in the 1980s and 1990s, which led to the establishment of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) in 1999 (Barnard). Furthermore, he notes that there is potential for individuals to become physically or psychologically dependent on steroids (Barnard). PEDs, like any drug, can have side effects, especially when combined with other medications, existing medical conditions, or poor dietary habits. One significant risk is that unsanitary injection practices can lead to the transmission of diseases such as HIV/AIDS and hepatitis B and C (Barnard). Other serious side effects include premature puberty, liver issues, mood swings, cardiovascular problems, and kidney failure (Barnard).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the use of performance-enhancing drugs in sports remains a highly contentious issue. While some argue for their potential to level the playing field, the ethical, health, and societal implications are profound. The allure of enhanced performance must be weighed against the risks of physical harm and the erosion of sportsmanship values. As this debate continues, it's essential to consider not only the immediate benefits of PEDs but also the long-term consequences for athletes and the integrity of sports. Addressing the challenges posed by PEDs requires a nuanced understanding of their impact and a commitment to preserving the spirit of fair competition.

Did you like this example?

720

38