The Media’s Moral Quandary: Profit Vs. Humanity

In today's fast-paced world, it seems almost impossible to escape the pervasive presence of advertisements. Even those who avoid electronic devices find themselves inundated with marketing messages. Amidst this constant barrage of information, a pressing question arises: where do we draw the line between what is mere spectacle and what constitutes genuine news? The 1976 film "Network" offers a satirical critique of this dilemma, arguing that human life is often valued less than money, or, in the context of the film, television ratings.

Exploiting Tragedy for Ratings

One of the most unforgettable scenes in "Network" features Howard Beale, a central character, dramatically announcing his retirement due to low viewership. He declares that since the show is the only thing he lives for, he intends to end his life on air. This desperate plea for attention is largely ignored by those responsible for broadcasting, except for Max Schumacher, the man behind Beale's forced retirement. Schumacher tries to console Beale, leading to a drunken conversation that further underscores the film's satirical message. They jokingly discuss ideas like "Suicide of the Week" or "Terrorist of the Week," highlighting how media can trivialize the sanctity of human life in pursuit of higher ratings.

The film continues with Beale being reintroduced on air, where he delivers a passionate and vulgar speech, urging viewers to get mad. This outburst captures public attention, skyrocketing viewership. The speech has since permeated popular culture, referenced by news anchors and even parodied by artists like Jennifer Lopez for various agendas, such as feminism. However, the film's most potent argument is embodied by the character Diana Christensen, who personifies the media's moral bankruptcy. Her relentless exploitation of Beale for ratings, without regard for his mental health, culminates in his murder when he no longer serves her interests. The killing is orchestrated in front of a live audience, under the guise of a terrorist attack, to sustain high viewership. This tragic conclusion underscores the film's central thesis: in the media world, viewership—and by extension, profit—supersedes human life.

Real-World Reflections

The themes explored in "Network" remain relevant today, as the media landscape continues to exploit audiences through relentless advertising. The case of Laura Ingraham illustrates this dynamic. Her show faced jeopardy after advertisers withdrew due to a Twitter protest led by David Hogg. This incident mirrors the ease with which advertisers can abandon a figure like Beale, albeit for different reasons. The parallels between fictional and real scenarios highlight the ongoing tension between media profitability and ethical responsibility.

Ultimately, the film serves as a cautionary tale, warning against the dangers of valuing profit over human dignity. It challenges viewers to reflect on the ethical implications of their consumption habits and the media's role in shaping societal values. By prioritizing ratings and sensationalism, the media risks losing sight of its fundamental duty to inform and uplift the public. Only by acknowledging and addressing these issues can a more responsible and humane media environment be cultivated.

Conclusion

In conclusion, "Network" provides a thought-provoking critique of the media's prioritization of profit over human life. Through its satirical portrayal of television networks exploiting tragedy for ratings, the film highlights the ethical dilemmas faced by the industry. This narrative remains relevant today, as the media continues to grapple with the balance between profitability and ethical responsibility. By fostering a more conscientious media landscape, we can strive to ensure that human dignity and truth are upheld, rather than sacrificed on the altar of commercial gain.

Did you like this example?

384

16