France: New Gender Equality Obligations Established

Exclusively available on PapersOwl
Updated: Mar 14, 2023
Cite this
Date added
Pages:  7
Order Original Essay

How it works

Article Summary

In this article, Marion Le Roux and Ji Eun Kaela Kim clarify a set of new obligations that are enforced on employers that aim to promote professional equality between men and women in the workplace. Le Roux and Kim (2019) raise the argument that there are about one-fourth of pay gaps between men and women employees, and they also add that numerous female employees also undergo further kinds of disparate treatment at the workplace (Le Roux and Kim, 2019, para. 4). Because of the unequal treatment, and specifically, the gender pay-gap, the French government decided to add and toughen companies’ obligations to achieve gender pay equality successfully.

Need a custom essay on the same topic?
Give us your paper requirements, choose a writer and we’ll deliver the highest-quality essay!
Order now

The article outlines the major changes that will be implemented and enforced on different companies with different amounts of employees so that professional equality between men and women is achieved at work. Following these new obligations will be an evaluation and consultation with the Social Economic Committee (CSE) to assure that employers eliminate gender pay gaps. If companies are noncompliant, the labor authorities may enforce financial penalties.

Article Analysis:

I relate this article to my experience working at Plumeria Bingo, which is locally owned and located in Tamuning. Plumeria Bingo is a Bingo company that is mixed with about an even amount of men and women employees. We have the same employee positions that are filled with both men and women, and the wages each of them receives are the same, with the exception to employees with long-term work experience. During the hiring process, our HR manager and company owner strongly emphasized the importance and their objective to fulfill equality between genders and the pay that they receive. They also hold a meeting every month with all employees to evaluate our work progress, discuss workplace strategies, and reinforce professional equality between all employees.

Article Evaluation:

Author Credibility – In this category, I rated this article (25/30). The author of this article is Marion Le Roux and Ji Eun Kaela Kim. Marion is an attorney with Capstan Avocats in Sophia Antipolis in France. She earned her masters degree from Georgetown University Law Center. Marion also has experience in advising and litigation and is also experienced in a wide range of labor and employment law issues affecting both individual and collective work relationships. Ji Eun Kaela Kim is also an attorney; however, she is with Capstan Avocats in Paris.

Information/Content – I rated this category (30/30). This article was recent, published on March 15, 2019. This article is complete, detailing how new obligations are enforced, how they are to be evaluated with five indicators for different size companies, and how employers are to score and publish that score every year. The article was easy to follow. Le Roux and Kim referenced laws and presented statistical research in their article to drive their arguments further. They also presented an outline of the new obligations on gender pay equality.

Structure & Format – This category, I rated a (20/20). The article started with a good informational introduction, and then presented the authors main topic. The article was easy to read and follow, and was formatted well. It was separated into different paragraph sections and had appropriate titles for each section explaining what information followed. The article was coherent from beginning, then middle, to end. The article also had completed sentences, with proper grammar and spelling.

Site & Access – In this category, I rated this article a (10/10). The source for the article was credible and scholarly. The article was easy to find and access. The site navigation was easy to go through to choose an appropriate article. The articles on the sites were very current and up to date, and many of the articles were relative to Human Resource Management. The site and the article were very reliable.

Purpose & Other – I rated this category (10/10). This article is strongly related to my class, and my area of study. The purpose of this article was to inform and outline the new gender obligations and equality. This article was very informative, presenting me with educational information. It shows how much equality between genders in the workplace is needed for a healthy workplace environment. This article reaches its target audience.

The French government has established a new set of obligations on employers aimed at promoting professional equality between men and women in the workplace, including the introduction and publication of specific pay gap indicators and penalties for failure to address pay inequality.

Both before and after his election in 2017, President Emmanuel Macron committed to gender equality and more particularly to achieving professional equality between women and men by the end of his five-year term. Not surprisingly, his proposals for achieving this goal were awaited with great anticipation.

At the time of Macron’s election, the Labor Code already included a vast number of measures designed to promote gender equality in the workplace, including the obligations to consult with the Social and Economic Committee (CSE) on gender equality every year and to negotiate with labor unions on a regular or annual basis, the latter of which is subject to a fine of up to 1 percent of the company’s gross wages.

Despite these measures, the average wage gap between men and women remains significant (24 percent overall, and 9 percent for equivalent positions and working hours), with many female employees also experiencing other forms of unequal treatment at work. Thus, the French government decided to add to and toughen the obligations on companies in order to attain gender pay equality more effectively.

These new obligations were created through the “”Freedom to Choose a Professional Future Law,”” published on Sept. 6, 2018, which includes an entire section dedicated to gender equality. This new piece of legislation contains provisions aimed at promoting professional equality between women and men, particularly in terms of pay and combating sexual and gender-based violence at work. A decree published on Jan. 8 implementing these provisions further specified the details on the indicators to be used to measure pay gaps between women and men and the reporting obligation for companies with at least 50 employees. Here is an overview of the major changes that will impact your HR practices.

What’s New in Terms of Equal Pay?

Certain employers are now strictly liable to ensure equal pay between women and men. They are also subject to a gender pay-gap evaluation system involving the evaluation of specific pay-gap indicators, the publication of their scores on these indicators and a financial penalty in the event that they do not bring their score up to the minimum required level within three years.

Which Companies Are Concerned?

The new law requires all employers to seek to eliminate gender pay gaps. However, the new legal obligations apply only to companies with at least 50 employees, regardless of whether they have trade unions or representative bodies.

What Are the New Obligations?

Evaluation and publication of indicators on gender pay equality. Every year, employers must now measure and publish the following five indicators relating to gender pay gaps (only four for companies with 50 to 250 employees, as explained below): The pay gap percentage between women and men calculated on the average remuneration of women and men in the same age group and job category (scale from 0 to 40 points).

The gap in the rate of individual salary increases between women and men (scale from 0 to 20 points or from 0 to 35 points for companies employing between 50 and 250 employees). The gap in the rate of promotion between women and men (scale from 0 to 15 points; this does not apply to companies employing between 50 and 250 employees).Percentage of women benefiting from a salary increase in the year following their return from maternity leave (scale from 0 to 15 points). Number of employees of the underrepresented sex among the 10 highest-paid employees (scale from 0 to 10 points). The overall score is the sum of the points obtained for each of the five indicators (four for companies between 50 and 250 employees). The minimum required overall score is 75 out of 100 points. Failing this, the employer must implement corrective measures.

The overall score for each calendar year must be published by March 1 of the following year on the company website or, if no website exists, communicated to the employees by any means. The CSE, if any, must also be provided with the following information on the previous calendar year by March 1: the indicators, the results, any information necessary for the CSE to understand the methodology applied, and, where applicable, the corrective measures planned or already implemented. This information must be included in the Economic and Social Database (BDES) available to all employee representatives and also must be provided to the labor authorities.

Obligation to provide for wage catch-up measures. If the overall score for a given year is below 75 points, the employer will be required to include a wage catch-up plan in the agenda for the mandatory negotiations with trade unions on professional gender equality. In this case, the employer will have to negotiate with trade unions on adequate and appropriate corrective measures, and, where applicable, implement a one-year or multiyear plan of financial measures to close the identified gaps.

In the absence of an agreement providing for such measures, measures must be unilaterally set by the employer, after consultation with the employee representatives. These measures must be taken to improve annual indicators within three years from the publication of the overall score. What are the penalties for noncompliance? If, at the end of the three-year period following a year in which the overall score was below 75, the overall score is still below 75 points, a financial penalty may be imposed by the labor authorities. However, depending on the efforts made by the company in terms of gender pay equality, as well as the reasons for its failure, an additional year may be granted to the employer to bring itself into compliance. A penalty also may apply if the indicators are not published or in the absence of an agreement or action plan. The amount of the penalty is set at a maximum of 1 percent of the employer’s annual payroll.

What Are the Other Changes Aimed at Promoting Gender Equality?

Mandatory negotiation on gender equality is expanded. Until now, mandatory negotiation on gender equality in the workplace focused on measures to combat any gender discrimination in recruitment, employment and access to vocational training. The new law extended this list to include subjects relating to the acquisition of a professional qualification (participation in at least one training course, acquisition of requirements needed for certification through training or validation of prior experience, salary increase or career advancement).

Gender equality encouraged at the top of certain companies. The board of directors or the supervisory board of all French “”sociétés anonymes”” (limited companies) and “”sociétés en commandite par actions”” (companies/partnerships limited by shares) must deliberate annually on the company’s policy on professional and pay equity. In listed companies exceeding two of the three applicable thresholds (annual turnover of 40 million euros (approximately U.S. $45.28 million), balance sheet total of 20 million euros (approximately U.S. $22.64) and/or 250 employees), the annual corporate governance report attached to the management report must include a description of the gender equality policy applied to members of the board of directors or supervisory board.

Tougher measures against sexual harassment and sexist behavior. Obligation to inform employees about possible sexual harassment litigation. There was already an obligation to provide information in the workplace on sexual harassment and sexist behavior. The law now stipulates that employers also must provide information about possible civil and criminal sexual harassment litigation claims and the contact details of the competent authorities, such as a labor inspector or occupational health doctor.

Obligations to appoint a sexual harassment reference person. The CSE must appoint a reference person for the fight against sexual harassment and sexist behavior.

In any company with at least 250 employees, the company must also appoint a reference person to guide, inform and support employees in the fight against sexual harassment and sexist behavior.

What Are the Next Steps?

Some of the new measures have been applicable since Sept. 6, 2018, such as mandatory annual negotiation on gender equality and obligations on management bodies. Other measures, such as those tougher measures against sexual harassment and sexist behavior have been applicable since Jan. 1. Thus, every company should make sure it has taken appropriate actions to comply with the new obligations.

With regard to the publication of wage gap indicators and wage catch-up measures, the first publication of the pay gap indicators is on:

  1. March 1 for companies with more than 1,000 employees.
  2. Sept. 1 for companies with more than 250 and less than 1,000 employees.
  3. March 1, 2020, for companies between 50 and 250 employees.”
The deadline is too short to read someone else's essay
Hire a verified expert to write you a 100% Plagiarism-Free paper

Cite this page

France: New Gender Equality Obligations Established. (2021, Jun 17). Retrieved from