Compared and Contrast on Followership and the Servant Leadership

writer-avatar
Exclusively available on PapersOwl
Updated: Mar 28, 2025
Listen
Download
Cite this
Date added
2025/03/28
Order Original Essay

How it works

Two concepts that frequently surface are followership and servant leadership. Both are integral to the success of any team or organization, but they represent different roles and perspectives within the leadership-followership spectrum. Followership refers to the behaviors and actions of individuals who follow a leader, supporting and contributing to the achievement of organizational goals. Conversely, servant leadership is a leadership philosophy in which the leader's primary goal is to serve others, prioritizing the needs of their team members and organization over their own.

Need a custom essay on the same topic?
Give us your paper requirements, choose a writer and we’ll deliver the highest-quality essay!
Order now

While both followership and servant leadership emphasize the importance of mutual support and the achievement of common objectives, they diverge in their approach and underlying principles. This essay aims to compare and contrast followership and servant leadership, examining their definitions, characteristics, and impacts within an organizational setting.

Followership is an often-overlooked aspect of organizational dynamics, yet it plays a critical role in achieving organizational success. Followers are not merely passive recipients of orders; they actively engage with leaders, providing support, feedback, and collaboration. Effective followership requires individuals to be adaptable, reliable, and proactive, contributing to the collective effort of the team. Followers are often characterized by their ability to think critically, offer constructive criticism, and demonstrate loyalty to both the leader and the organization's goals. Good followers can enhance the effectiveness of a leader by anticipating needs, complementing strengths, and compensating for weaknesses. Moreover, followership is not a static role; it can evolve as followers gain experience and develop leadership skills. This dynamic interaction fosters a symbiotic relationship where leaders and followers learn from each other, thereby promoting growth and innovation within the organization.

In contrast, servant leadership flips the traditional leadership model on its head by prioritizing the well-being and development of team members. Originating from the ideas of Robert K. Greenleaf, servant leadership is characterized by a leader's commitment to serving others, fostering a culture of trust, empathy, and empowerment. Servant leaders prioritize the needs of their followers by actively listening, providing resources, and creating opportunities for personal and professional growth. This leadership style is rooted in the belief that by serving others, leaders can unlock their team's full potential, leading to increased collaboration, creativity, and performance. Servant leadership is often associated with key characteristics such as humility, stewardship, and a deep sense of community. By focusing on the development and well-being of team members, servant leaders create an environment where individuals feel valued and motivated to contribute their best efforts.

While both followership and servant leadership emphasize the importance of collaboration and mutual support, they differ in their focus and execution. Followership is centered on the role of the individual within the team, highlighting the importance of active engagement and support for the leader. It acknowledges the power dynamics inherent in organizational structures and seeks to optimize the leader-follower relationship for mutual benefit. On the other hand, servant leadership challenges traditional power hierarchies by placing the leader in the role of a servant to their followers. This approach shifts the focus from authority and control to empowerment and shared responsibility, encouraging leaders to prioritize the development and well-being of their team members over their own interests.

In conclusion, both followership and servant leadership are essential components of effective organizational dynamics, each contributing to the achievement of common goals through different means. Followership emphasizes the active engagement and support of individuals within a team, recognizing the importance of collaboration and mutual benefit in the leader-follower relationship. Conversely, servant leadership prioritizes the needs and development of team members, fostering a culture of trust, empathy, and empowerment. While these concepts differ in their focus and execution, they share a common goal: the success and well-being of the organization and its members. By understanding and integrating both followership and servant leadership, organizations can create an environment where individuals are motivated, supported, and empowered to reach their full potential, leading to enhanced performance, innovation, and growth.

The deadline is too short to read someone else's essay
Hire a verified expert to write you a 100% Plagiarism-Free paper
WRITE MY ESSAY
Papersowl
4.7/5
Sitejabber
4.7/5
Reviews.io
4.9/5

Cite this page

Compared and Contrast on Followership and the Servant Leadership. (2025, Mar 28). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/compared-and-contrast-on-followership-and-the-servant-leadership/