Child Protection Policy Differences between USA and Colombia

Introduction

This paper provides a detailed examination of the child welfare systems in the United States and Colombia, highlighting their similarities and differences. The child welfare system is a network of services aimed at enhancing children's well-being by ensuring their safety, achieving permanency, and empowering families to provide effective care (Adamowicz, 2019). Most individuals become involved in the system due to allegations of child neglect or abuse, collectively known as child maltreatment. According to Federal Law, child maltreatment encompasses serious harm resulting from neglect, physical, sexual, or emotional mistreatment by relatives or primary caregivers (Children’s Bureau, 2016).

In 2016, reports estimated that 4.1 million claims of child maltreatment were filed with child protection agencies, affecting approximately 7.4 million children. Notably, 2.3 million of these claims were investigated by Child Protective Services (CPS). The District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, along with the 50 states, were identified as having significant instances of child abuse and neglect, involving approximately 676,000 children. Of these, 74.8% were cases of neglect, 18.2% involved physical harm, and 8.5% involved sexual harm (Children’s Bureau, 2016). This underscores the necessity for stakeholders to develop effective strategies to combat child maltreatment. Consequently, this paper will compare and contrast the child welfare systems in the USA and Colombia, aiming to provide deeper insights into their operations and challenges.

Historical Development of Child Welfare Systems

The evolution of the child welfare system began in the 19th century with voluntary child-saving efforts, which later transformed into government-funded interventions. These efforts aimed to identify and protect children from mistreatment and abandonment while preserving family integrity. The federal government has played a crucial role in financing and formulating policy frameworks for child welfare since the 1970s. However, concerns persist regarding the overemphasis on services directed toward tribal and ethnic subgroups. Voluntary organizations initially took the lead in addressing grievances related to child mistreatment, abuse, and neglect, sparking widespread media attention and public concern.

The case of Mary Ellen Wilson, a young girl rescued from abusive caregivers in 1874, marked a pivotal moment in the development of the child welfare system. Henry Bergh, a leader of the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (NYSPCA), intervened in Mary Ellen's case, leading to the establishment of the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NYSPCC). This initiative inspired the formation of similar organizations in major cities, which were granted quasi-judicial authority by courts to rescue children from unsafe homes and place them in adoptive homes or institutions (Courtney, 2013).

Child Welfare in Colombia

Colombia is characterized by a rich blend of Spanish, African, and Native cultures, with economic class distinctions overshadowing racial divides. The country's income inequality ranks among the highest globally, with approximately one-third of the population living below the poverty line. Despite these challenges, Colombia's adoption program is well-regarded but has undergone changes in recent years (Schoborg, 2019). Inter-country adoptions between the USA and Colombia began in 1968, prompting the Colombian government to actively advocate for children awaiting adoption or foster care. Colombia signed the Hague Convention in 1997, though it was not implemented in the United States until 2008. Since then, all Colombian adoptions must comply with Hague Convention requirements.

The Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar (ICBF), or Colombia's Institute of Family Welfare, serves as the central authority for child welfare. The ICBF's main office is in Bogota, with 33 regional offices across Colombia and eight private institutions, known as Casa Privadas, acting as ICBF delegates. Initially, Casa Privadas provided shelter, counseling, and education to mothers, but in 2006, they shifted focus to adoption facilitation for older children and those with specific needs due to funding challenges (Schoborg, 2019). The ICBF and its delegated authorities are responsible for matching children with prospective families, ensuring their rights and well-being.

The child welfare system in Colombia relies heavily on foster care, prohibiting private adoptions. Children live in various institutions, including private Catholic institutions and ICBF-operated orphanages. The adoption law in Colombia requires the physical presence of both adopting parents. Additionally, the Article 5 letter from the US embassy in Bogota is necessary for securing an immigrant visa. Children up to 16 years old can be adopted, and those aged eight and older must provide consent for adoption (Schoborg, 2019).

Similarities Between the USA and Colombia

Despite differences in their child welfare systems, the USA and Colombia share several similarities. Both countries allocate substantial resources to child welfare services, aiming to create robust and comprehensive systems. Colombia and the USA often serve as examples of well-resourced and highly developed child welfare systems. In the USA, the federal government spends approximately 7.8% of its budget on child welfare, while Colombia allocates around 3% of its budget from the Colombia Family Welfare Institute (Stoltzfus, 2017). These budgets are distributed based on regional needs, ensuring equitable resource allocation.

Another commonality is the regular monitoring and evaluation of child welfare systems in both countries. This practice ensures system effectiveness and identifies areas for improvement based on lessons learned. Transparency is a key feature in both systems, preventing unethical practices by providing detailed information on the number of children in care, resource allocation, and outcomes. The USA offers extensive information through the Child Welfare Information Gateway, while Colombia provides similar resources through the Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar's website.

Both countries have established governmental infrastructures, such as birth registries, to uphold children's rights and facilitate reunification efforts. For example, the USA ensures thorough registration and record-keeping to assist children separated from their birth families and placed in adoptive care. This approach contrasts with the challenges faced by countries like Haiti, which registered only 30% of children after the 2010 earthquake, complicating reunification efforts (Stoltzfus, 2017).

Differences Between the USA and Colombia

Significant differences exist between the child welfare systems in the USA and Colombia. In Colombia, there is no unified legal or administrative system dedicated to child protection, but rather a national family welfare system. In contrast, the USA has a specialized child welfare system (UNICEF, 2016). The USA's system is more advanced, well-financed, and established, whereas Colombia relies on external support due to economic constraints.

Colombia faces challenges such as insufficient budgets, services, and trained human resources to meet children's needs. In contrast, the USA possesses adequate resources to address these demands. Furthermore, children from ethnic subgroups in Colombia, particularly in rural areas, lack access to essential services due to geographical, racial, and financial disparities (UNICEF, 2016). The USA, on the other hand, ensures widespread service distribution with minimal racial disparities.

Colombia's lack of proper coordination hinders child rights protection, as not all public servants understand or implement established strategies and regulations. Additionally, children and adolescents often enter the education system late, prolonging their schooling. The USA, in contrast, has measures in place to ensure timely school entry and completion (UNICEF, 2016).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the child welfare systems in the USA and Colombia serve as critical frameworks for protecting children's rights and ensuring their safety and well-being. While both countries share similarities in resource allocation, transparency, and infrastructure development, significant differences in system organization, funding, and service accessibility persist. As child welfare agencies continue to address rising reports of maltreatment, it is imperative that they operate continuously to meet the diverse needs of children from various backgrounds. By understanding and addressing the unique challenges faced by each country, stakeholders can work towards creating more effective and equitable child welfare systems. The comparison of the USA and Colombia highlights the importance of tailored approaches and collaboration in safeguarding the future of vulnerable children.

Did you like this example?

692

29