Freedom: a Multifaceted Journey
Freedom is a noble ideal that many strive for, yet it remains an elusive and often undefined concept. While we all aspire to be free, the true nature of freedom varies significantly from person to person. In Kate Chopin’s "The Story of an Hour" and Ernest Hemingway’s "Hills Like White Elephants," the theme of freedom serves as a powerful motivator for the main characters. Each story presents a unique perspective on freedom, highlighting its dual nature: as both a blissful, ecstatic state and a concept that carries a darker, more sinister side.
By comparing these stories, we can gain insight into the diverse meanings freedom can hold for different individuals and explore the question of whether freedom can indeed be shared between two people, and if so, at what cost.
The Elusive Nature of Freedom
In "The Story of an Hour," Kate Chopin masterfully portrays the protagonist, Louise Mallard, who experiences freedom in an unexpected and distressing manner—through the death of her husband. This sudden tragedy, paradoxically, brings Louise an intense sense of liberation. The freedom she discovers is so potent and overwhelming that it ultimately leads to her demise. Her story illustrates the perilous cost of freedom, as it is attained through the loss of a loved one. Chopin captures the complexity of this newfound freedom, which obliterates years of marriage in an instant of unrestrained joy. For Louise, this moment represents an escape from oppression and a chance to embrace her own identity. Her husband’s death, which might be seen as a cause for grief, becomes the catalyst for her rebirth. Her freedom, however, is not without a sense of villainy, as it comes at a significant moral cost.
Louise’s epiphany occurs when she realizes that her husband’s death grants her the opportunity to live for herself, a life devoid of anyone else's commands. Her whispered affirmation, "Free! Body and soul free!" encapsulates her newfound autonomy. This moment of self-realization is both exhilarating and terrifying, as it underscores the duality of freedom: the profound joy it can bring and the heavy price it demands. Initially, Louise struggles to accept this truth, but she cannot suppress the burgeoning sense of liberation. Her freedom, though exhilarating, is marred by the grim reality that it is built upon the foundation of death. This realization speaks to the broader theme of the story—freedom often demands sacrifice and carries consequences that are difficult to reconcile.
In Ernest Hemingway’s "Hills Like White Elephants," the conversation between Jig and the American further explores the complex nature of freedom. Their dialogue revolves around the possibility of "having everything" after undergoing a medical procedure, presumably an abortion. For the American, this procedure represents a way to preserve his freedom by avoiding the responsibilities of parenthood. He believes that by eliminating the prospect of having children, they can return to a carefree existence, free from any constraints. This notion of freedom, however, comes at a steep cost—the potential loss of an innocent life. The American’s desire to maintain his independence highlights a darker side of freedom, where personal autonomy is prioritized over the well-being of others.
Conversely, Jig’s perspective on freedom centers on choice. For her, true freedom lies in the ability to make her own decisions, particularly concerning the fate of her unborn child. The child symbolizes her autonomy and the power to shape her own life, independent of the American’s wishes. Throughout the story, the American attempts to assert control over the situation, dictating their future and disregarding Jig’s desires. Her resistance to his commands underscores her yearning for freedom through the exercise of her own will. The cost of her freedom is not as dire as that faced by Louise, but it is nonetheless significant. For Jig, freedom is embodied in the life of her child—a testament to her defiance against societal expectations and the constraints of their relationship.
Conflicting Visions of Freedom
The divergent views on freedom in these stories reveal the inherent complexity of the concept. Both the American and Louise Mallard share a desire for a life unencumbered by external influences. They seek independence, where they alone dictate the course of their lives. Despite their different circumstances and motivations, their fundamental ideals of freedom align. However, Jig’s understanding of freedom diverges from this perspective. Her freedom is rooted in choice and autonomy—the ability to make decisions that reflect her own desires and aspirations. This contrast highlights a central question: can these differing visions of freedom coexist within a single relationship?
In "The Story of an Hour," Louise’s freedom is achieved through the dissolution of her marriage, resulting in her husband’s death and the end of their shared life. This newfound autonomy is portrayed as a victory, a release from the oppressive constraints of marriage. Her status as a widow grants her unparalleled freedom, but only because her husband’s freedom, along with his life, has been extinguished. Her liberation can only exist in the absence of his, much like cold can only manifest without heat. In marriage, Louise’s life was intertwined with her husband’s, and his influence was inescapable. The moment he returns, her freedom is shattered, symbolized by her sudden death. The two freedoms cannot coexist, and his survival negates her autonomy.
In "Hills Like White Elephants," the struggle for freedom is a battle over the life of their unborn child. Jig and the American’s conflicting desires epitomize the tension between individual autonomy and shared responsibility. The child represents Jig’s freedom, while the American’s reluctance to embrace parenthood signifies his desire for a life unburdened by familial obligations. Their conflicting wills create an impasse, much like in "The Story of an Hour," where one person’s freedom comes at the expense of another’s. The unresolved tension between Jig and the American leaves the outcome ambiguous, but it underscores the profound impact such conflicts can have on relationships.
The Complexity of Freedom
Freedom is a multifaceted and often contentious concept. What may be liberating for one person can be detrimental or offensive to another. This complexity is mirrored in societal structures, where individuals must balance personal autonomy with collective responsibilities. On a personal level, achieving freedom requires navigating the delicate interplay between independence and companionship. Human beings are inherently social creatures, drawn to relationships and connections. However, these relationships often entail compromises and shared decision-making, which can clash with personal desires for autonomy.
In "The Story of an Hour" and "Hills Like White Elephants," the characters’ struggles with freedom illustrate the intricate dynamics of human relationships. The pursuit of freedom, while desirable, is fraught with challenges and sacrifices. The stories highlight the paradox that achieving complete individual freedom often necessitates the relinquishment of shared bonds. Ultimately, the quest for freedom is a deeply personal journey, and the outcome is shaped by the choices and sacrifices each individual is willing to make. In the end, the stories remind us that the path to freedom is rarely straightforward, and the cost of liberation can be profoundly transformative, for better or for worse.
Freedom: A Multifaceted Journey. (2021, Feb 26). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/characters-in-story-of-an-hour-and-hills-like-white-elephants/