Barbara Grutter and the Evolution of Affirmative Action in Higher Education

People frequently bring up Barbara Grutter's name when talking about affirmative action especially when talking about getting into college. In the early 2000s her case against the University of Michigan Law School started a national debate that still affects today's laws. As a resident of Michigan Grutter applied to the law school in 1996 but was turned down. Grutter v. Bollinger her next case went all the way to the Supreme Court and argued that the university's affirmative action policy was unconstitutional.

Fundamental to Grutter's case was the claim that the university's use of race as a factor in admissions went against the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Universities like the University of Michigan supported their policy by saying that having a variety of students was important for making the learning process better. Basically the case asked if promoting variety was a good enough reason to use race as a factor in entry choices.

In a very important ruling in 2003 the Supreme Court sided with the University of Michigan 5–4. According to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's majority decision diversity in higher education was a good goal. According to the Court the university's policy was carefully designed to get the educational benefits of having a diverse student group. This important ruling supported the idea that colleges could use race as one of many factors in admissions decisions but not as the only source of information.

The Grutter case had deep effects changing how colleges and universities across the country handle diversity in applications. Furthermore it emphasized the teaching worth of having a varied student body which helps students see things from different points of view and gets them ready for an international world. Despite this ruling the discussion over affirmative action is still going on changing as new laws are made and as people's ideas about fairness and chance change.

Beyond its effects on the law Barbara Grutter's case led to wider conversations about education fairness justice and equality. If race-conscious admissions really support justice and close past gaps or if they unintentionally keep racism alive this made people wonder. Proponents say that these kinds of policies are needed to get rid of structural hurdles and make sure that everyone has the same chances to go to school. However critics raise worries about justice and the chance of abuse going the other way.

Although the Grutter ruling happened years ago ongoing court cases and shifting public opinion continue to shape affirmative action policies. Although some states have banned using race as a factor in college admissions choices others are looking into other ways to make campuses more diverse. Changing populations political situations and new court rulings continue to shape the scene.

This case involving Barbara Grutter is still a major issue in the current national discussion about affirmative action. Like a warning of how hard it is to balance goals for variety with basic values of fairness and equality. With colleges trying to make learning spaces that are welcoming and mirror society's variety Grutter v. Bollinger's impact lives on influencing policies and procedures that aim to make the education system more fair for future generations.

Did you like this example?

265

11