War Poetry and the Human Cost of WWI

The Great War's impact reached far beyond the trenches, transforming both battlefront and homeland.While the war's adversaries were clearly defined, the broader public grappled with confusion and conflicting narratives about the war's purpose and impact. The young men who served were subjected to nightmarish conditions, including rampant infestations of rats and lice, the horrors of trench warfare, and severe food shortages. The poets Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen were deeply influenced by their experiences in the war, and their poetry reflects their intense emotions and perspectives.

Sassoon's work is characterized by fierce, passionate critiques of the war, while Owen's poetry offers a brutally realistic portrayal of its horrors. Together, they use their literary talents to expose the illusions surrounding WWI and its traumatic effects on veterans. This essay explores how these poets employ various literary techniques to communicate their critiques and experiences, ultimately offering a more nuanced understanding of their works.

Sassoon’s Critique of Society’s Illusions

Siegfried Sassoon's poetry is a scathing critique of both World War I and the societal illusions that surrounded it. His poem "They" serves as a powerful example of his critical approach. The poem is structured in two stanzas, each consisting of six lines written in iambic pentameter, and follows a rhyme scheme of ABABCC. This formal structure belies the chaotic and traumatic experiences it describes, creating a stark contrast that underscores the poem's themes.

The poem begins with a dialogue between a bishop and returning soldiers. The line "When the boys come back, they will not be the same" immediately sets the tone, suggesting a transformation wrought by the horrors of war. The bishop's assertion that the soldiers fought "in a just cause" reflects the pervasive societal belief that the war was righteous and necessary. Here, Sassoon employs alliteration to emphasize the bishop's misguided conviction. However, the poem's second stanza vividly undermines this illusion by detailing the physical and psychological scars borne by the soldiers: George has lost his legs, Bill is blind, Jim has been shot through the lungs, and Burt suffers from syphilis. This grim imagery starkly contrasts with the bishop's naive assurances, revealing the brutal reality of war and highlighting the disconnect between public perception and actual experience.

Owen’s Realism: The Experience of War

Wilfred Owen, inspired by Sassoon's work, employs his own distinct literary techniques to convey the harsh realities of war. In "Anthem for Doomed Youth," Owen uses a unique structure of an octet followed by a sestet, with a rhyme scheme of ABABCDCDEFEFGG. This sonnet form, traditionally associated with love and beauty, is repurposed to explore themes of death and despair, further emphasizing the poem's poignancy.

Owen opens the poem with personification: "only the monstrous anger of the guns," "the shrill, demented choirs of wailing shells," and "the bugles calling" evoke the chaos and violence of the battlefield. These vivid images allow readers to viscerally experience the war's cacophony, while the line "only the stuttering rifles' rapid rattle" uses onomatopoeia and alliteration to capture the relentless barrage of gunfire. The second stanza shifts to a more reflective tone, posing the rhetorical question, "What candles may be held to speed them all?" Here, Owen contrasts the traditional rituals of mourning with the anonymity and brutality of wartime deaths. The absence of candles, symbols of hope and guidance, underscores the soldiers' tragic fate and the futility of war.

Distinct Approaches, Shared Purpose

While Sassoon and Owen employ different literary techniques, both poets share a commitment to exposing the harsh truths of war. Sassoon's work is characterized by its critical tone and direct confrontation of societal illusions, as exemplified by his portrayal of the bishop in "They." This character, who claims to understand the war's impact, is revealed to be ignorant of the soldiers' suffering. Sassoon's incisive critique underscores the gap between public perception and lived reality. In contrast, Owen's poetry focuses on capturing the immediacy and intensity of wartime experiences. In "Anthem for Doomed Youth," his use of personification and detailed imagery draws readers into the war's chaos, emphasizing the sensory and emotional impact on soldiers.

Both poets effectively use literary techniques such as alliteration, imagery, and personification to convey their messages. Sassoon's critical lens challenges readers to question their assumptions, while Owen's vivid depictions invite readers to engage deeply with the soldiers' experiences. Despite their different approaches, Sassoon and Owen's works collectively offer a powerful critique of World War I and invite reflection on the broader societal implications of war.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen provide compelling critiques of World War I through their poetry, employing literary techniques to expose the illusions and harsh realities of war. Sassoon's incisive criticism and Owen's vivid realism complement each other, offering a multifaceted perspective on the war's impact. Through their writings, they invite readers to reconsider the narratives surrounding war, challenging societal assumptions and highlighting the profound suffering of soldiers. By exploring these themes, their poetry continues to resonate, offering timeless insights into the human cost of conflict.

Did you like this example?

278

15