Automotive Industry Standards Across Global Markets

The automotive industry is a battleground where companies from across the globe vie for dominance. Among the key players in this fiercely competitive arena are Volkswagen, Renault, Ford, and the American giant, General Motors, to name just a few. While some companies have managed to thrive, many others have faded into history. A notable example of this struggle is General Motors, which, after years of financial losses, filed for Chapter 11 reorganization on June 1st, 2009. This American powerhouse, once a symbol of industrial might, had to cut over 20,000 jobs and close several facilities.

These financial woes eventually led to the company losing its global sales title to a Japanese contender, Toyota. Toyota, which was on the verge of bankruptcy in the 1950s, managed to turn its fortunes around and emerged as a formidable player in the automotive field.

Historical Context and Foundations

Founded in 1908, General Motors was the result of a consolidation of several car companies, including Buick, Oldsmobile, and Cadillac. By 1929, GM had surpassed Ford to become the leading American passenger car manufacturer, thanks to its aggressive expansion, including acquiring Vauxhall, Opel, and Holden. By 1941, GM was producing 44 percent of all cars in the United States, establishing itself as one of the largest industrial corporations globally.

In contrast, Toyota's journey began in 1923 when an earthquake in Japan piqued the interest of Sakichi Toyoda, a textile merchant. This interest eventually led to the development of the automotive division of Toyoda Automatic Loom Works. By 1932, the company had completed two prototype vehicles, marking its entry into the automotive manufacturing world. Despite humble beginnings, Toyota's commitment to innovation and quality paved the way for its future success.

Toyota's Total Quality Control

In the late 1950s, Toyota faced stagnant sales due to quality issues in its vehicles. Recognizing the need for change, the company introduced Total Quality Control (TQC) in 1959. The objective was to improve business management through full employee participation, enhancing awareness of quality and cost, and improving management systems. The TQC approach is characterized by a continuous cycle of design, production, sales, and market research, followed by redesign based on previous experiences. This cycle, known as the Deming Cycle or P-D-C-A (plan–do–check–act), became a model for continuous improvement.

TQC transformed Toyota, leading to improved product quality and heightened awareness of safety and corporate social responsibility. The company became the first recipient of the Japan Quality Medal in 1970, a testament to its commitment to quality. This focus on quality has been instrumental in Toyota's rise to become one of the top-selling automotive brands globally.

General Motors and the Global Manufacturing System

General Motors, on the other hand, enjoyed success from the 1950s to the 1970s, producing iconic cars like the Bel Air, Eldorado, GTO, and Corvette. However, a series of poor decisions in the 2000s, including a costly deal with Fiat Auto and the phasing out of brands like Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Saturn, and Hummer, led to its decline. The company faced bankruptcy in 2009 and required a government bailout to stay afloat.

In an effort to regain its footing, GM introduced the Global Manufacturing System, focusing on lean manufacturing initiatives. Inspired by Toyota's Production System, GM formed a joint venture with Toyota called New United Motor Manufacturing Inc. (NUMMI) in 1994. This collaboration allowed GM to adopt lean methods, significantly reducing assembly hours and defects per car. GM has since extended its lean initiatives to its supply chain, promoting efficiency and reducing waste.

Comparative Analysis: TQC vs. Lean Six Sigma

Toyota's TQC and General Motors' Lean Six Sigma represent two distinct approaches to quality management. TQC is customer-focused, emphasizing long-term quality improvement, reducing inspections, and fostering a culture of continuous learning and cooperation. It involves everyone in the organization, from managers to shop floor workers, in the quality management process.

Lean Six Sigma, adopted by GM, focuses on speed, metrics, and reducing variation. It aims to eliminate non-value work, improve customer satisfaction, and drive cost reduction. Lean Six Sigma projects are managed by "black belts" who work full-time on quality improvement until goals are achieved.

While TQC emphasizes strategic excellence and customer satisfaction, Lean Six Sigma targets specific financial goals, making it suitable for companies seeking rapid improvements. Both systems, however, require the collaboration of all stakeholders to succeed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the comparison between Toyota and General Motors' quality management systems reveals that both TQC and Lean Six Sigma have their unique strengths and applications. Toyota's early adoption of TQC allowed it to capture consumer needs and streamline processes, contributing to its steady market position. Meanwhile, GM's use of Lean Six Sigma was a strategic move to regain profitability after a period of decline. Both systems, when implemented correctly, can yield significant results, demonstrating that quality management is a critical factor in the success and longevity of automotive manufacturers.

Did you like this example?

1088

57