Analyzing Shakespeare’s Satirical Masterpiece

Introduction

The essay on Sonnet 130, "My mistress’ eyes are not at all like the sun," offers a unique and clever critique of the exaggerated symbolism employed by Shakespeare's contemporaries in their love poems. This sonnet parodies the cliched and overblown images of female beauty that were prevalent in the Elizabethan era. These idealized depictions continue to resonate in modern culture, where media and films often shape and manipulate our perceptions of what constitutes the perfect woman. This essay will explore how Shakespeare's language achieves a comic and satirical effect, challenging his contemporaries’ love sonnets and asserting that his love for his mistress is more genuine and grounded in reality.

Exploring Shakespeare's Language

Sonnet 130 begins with a bold and striking statement that shatters our expectations of a traditional love sonnet: "My mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun." This opening line immediately sets the tone for the rest of the poem, which eschews hyperbolic analogies and metaphors in favor of a more down-to-earth and honest depiction of the speaker's mistress. Unlike other poets who lavishly praise their lovers' beauty, Shakespeare adopts a straightforward and realistic approach, dismissing the exaggerated comparisons typically used to flatter and publicly celebrate one's beloved.

Throughout the first quatrain, Shakespeare continues this tone by parodying not his mistress, but rather the poets who use absurd and exaggerated comparisons to praise their lovers. For instance, he asserts that "coral is far more red" than his mistress's lips and that her breasts are not the pure snow white often claimed in poetic descriptions. The use of "black wires" to describe her hair is particularly striking, as it challenges the ideal of feminine beauty that favored light hair in Shakespeare's time. Even today, cultural stereotypes such as "blondes have more fun" persist, illustrating the enduring influence of these ideals. Shakespeare's subversion of these norms is both humorous and provocative, and his tone seems almost confrontational as he rejects the unrealistic standards of beauty imposed by his peers.

Continuing the Satirical Tone

The second quatrain maintains this satirical tone. Shakespeare admits that roses are more beautiful than his mistress's complexion, with red cheeks often symbolizing vitality and sexual attraction. His choice of the word "reeks" to describe her breath is both cleverly positioned and intentionally jarring. It rhymes with "cheeks" and concludes the second quatrain, leaving the reader with a vivid and unpleasant image. This unexpected honesty reinforces the poem's unconventional nature, as Shakespeare acknowledges his mistress's occasional bad breath, further emphasizing her ordinary, down-to-earth qualities.

In the third quatrain, Shakespeare continues to express genuine affection for his mistress, stating, "I love to hear her speak." However, he candidly admits that music has "a far more pleasing sound." This straightforwardness underscores the poem's authenticity, as the speaker finds pride in the ordinary qualities of his mistress. He concludes with, "My mistress when she walks treads on the ground," celebrating her as a real, tangible woman rather than an idealized goddess. This sense of pride stems from the fact that his mistress is genuine and unpretentious, unlike the ethereal figures depicted in other poets' verses.

Critique of Conventional Beauty Ideals

Critics such as Callaghan argue that the purpose of this sonnet is to challenge the ideal standard of blonde Petrarchan beauty, asserting that no woman truly fits this mold. Atkins takes this interpretation further, suggesting that Shakespeare's speaker is responding to another poet's idealized portrayal of his mistress. By declaring, "I don’t know about your mistress, but my mistress is nothing like that," the speaker emphasizes that his mistress is a real woman who does not require "false compare" to enhance her attractiveness.

In the final couplet, Shakespeare transforms the entire sonnet by implying that while his mistress may be ordinary, his love for her is "rare." The last line critiques poets who employ "false compare" to praise their lovers' looks and virtues. Shakespeare suggests that such extravagant imagery lacks sincerity, as their love is as insubstantial as the language they use to flatter their beloveds. Despite his earlier mockery of his mistress's features, Shakespeare concludes the poem by convincing the reader that his love is genuine and rooted in reality.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Shakespeare's Sonnet 130 stands as a timeless critique of the exaggerated and unrealistic portrayals of love and beauty that pervade both his era and our own. Through his satirical language and honest portrayal of his mistress, Shakespeare challenges the conventions of love poetry and celebrates the authenticity of his affection. By rejecting the empty clichés and hyperbolic comparisons employed by other poets, Shakespeare underscores the sincerity of his love, reminding us that true affection is grounded in reality rather than idealized fantasies. This essay on Sonnet 130 demonstrates how Shakespeare's clever use of language achieves a satirical effect, ultimately reinforcing the enduring power of genuine love.

Did you like this example?

300

16