Child Discipline Ethics

Disciplining children is a complex task that involves teaching them the difference between right and wrong. While some parents resort to punishment methods like spanking, defined by Elizabeth Gershoff (2013) as "hitting a child on the bottom with an open hand," this essay argues that spanking should not be employed as a disciplinary tool. Research indicates that spanking does not increase immediate compliance, reduce aggression, or help children internalize the intended disciplinary message. Instead, alternative non-violent disciplinary methods such as timeouts should be considered more effective and humane.

The Ineffectiveness of Spanking

One of the primary reasons parents choose spanking is to achieve immediate compliance from their children. However, Gershoff (2013) highlights that spanking is no more effective than timeouts in achieving this goal. Research shows that timeouts can achieve the desired immediate submission without resorting to violence. Furthermore, spanking can lead to negative emotional responses in children, such as fear, anger, and sadness, which hinder their ability to process and internalize the disciplinary messages from their parents (Gershoff, 2013). These negative emotions form a barrier, making spanking an ineffective disciplinary measure.

Another misconception about spanking is its assumed effect on reducing aggression in children. Contrary to this belief, studies have consistently shown a link between spanking and increased aggression in children over time. Gershoff (2013) notes that spanking is predictive of more aggression, regardless of the child's initial level of aggression. This suggests that rather than mitigating aggressive behavior, spanking may contribute to its escalation. The aggressive nature of spanking seems to model and reinforce aggressive behavior rather than curtail it.

Addressing Common Misconceptions

During a conversation with an individual who supports spanking, particularly for children seven and younger, it became evident that misconceptions about spanking persist. The belief that younger children cannot comprehend reasoning and thus require spanking to enforce appropriate behavior fails to consider the child's emotional and cognitive development. While it is true that younger children may struggle with complex reasoning, non-violent methods like timeouts can still convey disciplinary messages effectively.

Despite presenting research findings from Gershoff (2013) showing that spanking is not more effective than timeouts and that it predicts increased aggression, the individual remained unconvinced. She questioned the predictive nature of the research, seeking causal proof of the connection between spanking and aggression. However, ethical guidelines prevent the establishment of a causal link through experimental research. The reliance on predictive findings is not uncommon in psychological research, and these findings are significant enough to warrant reconsideration of spanking as a disciplinary tool.

The individual also argued that spanking provides an immediate and clear-cut resolution, whereas timeouts can be challenging if the child refuses to comply. However, the simplicity and immediacy of spanking do not justify its use, especially when considering the potential long-term negative effects on a child's emotional and behavioral development.

Disseminating Research and Encouraging Alternatives

To effectively disseminate information about the ineffectiveness of spanking, researchers should utilize popular magazines and daytime talk shows, which reach a broad audience. These platforms can help convey the message to people who might not actively seek out scholarly articles on parenting. However, there is a risk of misinformation if people turn to unreliable sources. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that reputable and evidence-based information is prominently featured.

Future research should focus on the immediate consequences of spanking, as understanding these effects may further dissuade parents from using this method. Investigating short-term negative impacts could provide a more comprehensive understanding of why spanking is not an effective disciplinary practice. By correlating spanking with immediate emotional and behavioral consequences, researchers can offer compelling evidence against its use.

Conclusion

In conclusion, spanking is not an effective disciplinary tool for children. It fails to enhance immediate compliance, does not reduce aggression, and interferes with a child's ability to internalize disciplinary messages. Despite common misconceptions, non-violent alternatives like timeouts are equally effective and do not carry the same risks of negative emotional and behavioral consequences. Disseminating research through accessible platforms and conducting further studies on immediate effects can help shift parental practices towards more effective and humane methods of discipline. By doing so, we can foster healthier emotional and behavioral development in children, ultimately contributing to a more compassionate and understanding society.

Did you like this example?

579

24