Relationships Among Mental Health, Self Assessment and Physical Health

People with mental or physical disabilities seems to always be over looked by society. Authors, Hannah Tough, Johannes Siegrist and Christine Fekete wrote “Social relationships, mental health and well being in physical disability: a systematic review,” published in 2017 in the BMC Public Health, and they state that one of the major negative impacts on metal health is poor social relationships. The author’s began by giving a very detailed background on the personal facts about the article. They have figures, tables and charts to support their research.

In the article, the authors first states that one’s wellbeing is important to consider the subjective areas that effects on a disable person everyday life. It is very common to know that the world tends to place someone that has a disability at the bottom of the stack. When it can be proven that people with disabilities can accomplish the task as well as other people. There is a link between mental health and social relationships in “normal” people’s lives. Customary, mental health is labeled as a complex buildup of empirical in the field of research.

A relationship can determine a person’s self assessment. When a person is diagnosed with a mental, physical or facial handicap, it can take a toll on the emotionally. The person already feel like a outcast and they extra hard to fit into society. Building positive social relationships can help the confidence of the person. Maybe they will strive harder to learn to walk, if they had a few friends to take a walk with. Although the connection between disability and interpersonal relationships is a topic worth exploring in its own right, it also has important implications for well-being and health. Numerous empirical studies across a number of behavioral science and medical disciplines have shown the importance of close interpersonal relationships for health and well-being.The heart of the negative portrayal of disability’s impact on interpersonal relationships is the presumed inequality imposed on the relationship when one participant has a disability but others do not. The type of inequality and its explanation are not always made explicit. Does it result from the (perceived) inability of people with disabilities to participate in activities that are important to some, most, or all friendships? Or does it arise from the (perceived) need on the part of the person with a disability for technological or human assistance to manage typical life tasks? Does it stem from a belief that the person with a disability does not possess the social or psychological resources to prove a stimulating and rewarding friend? These points apply as well to the relationship between disability and romantic and sexual intimacy. This aspect of romantic leave can amplify the concerns of people already skeptical about the ability of persons with disabilities to contribute to thriving friendships. Many nondisabled people may doubt that people with disabilities can be fulfilling partners in any loving adult relationship.

On the first table, they showed the overview of the social relationship, mental health and wellbeing and participant characteristics. The table included a total of sixty-three studies. The titles included regions, designs, social relationships concepts, mental health, wellbeing, quality rating. The authors discuss how the different characteristics can divide the physical disabilities. About ten studies show composite health scores. The most prolifically study was rheumatoid arthritis. Tables two and three showed the summary on the cross-sectional and results for the five constructs characteristics. Social support, social networks, negative social interactions, family functioning and relationship quality. The other forty-four studies shows the support of social and satisfaction definitions terms. Another study proved that depression can be diagnosed within the first year of negativity from social network. Disability creates a number of challenges to forging intimate physical and emotional relationships. People with sensory-motor impairments who were disabled beginning in early life often report that they were socially segregated from other children, either directly because they were tracked into different classes or different schools, or indirectly because other students avoided them.

In the conclusion of the article, the authors states that people with mental health and wellbeing relay on the important role that they play. The goes to show that just because I look different, doesn’t mean my love is different. Social isolation has long been known as a key trigger for mental illness, while supportive relationships with friends, family and neighbors are beneficial to the mental health of individuals and the population. Other forms of social interaction such as volunteering are also known to boost wellbeing

Did you like this example?

5273

108