The Enduring Impact of Racial Profiling

Racial profiling has been an enduring issue throughout history, deeply rooted in societal structures and power dynamics. Those who are persecuted and marginalized often demand answers for their unequal treatment, and the United States provides a stark example of this phenomenon. From its inception, American society was built on a foundation of hierarchical divisions, in which those in positions of power established a stark separation between themselves and others they deemed subordinate. This division was not only accepted but institutionalized, creating a legacy that persists to this day.

Despite significant strides toward racial equality, discrimination remains a pervasive issue that cannot be easily eliminated. Racial profiling, a clear manifestation of this discrimination, is particularly problematic. According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), racial profiling is defined as "the unfair practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin" (Racial Profiling: Definition, n.d.). This practice represents a form of bias against certain groups, rooted in the misguided belief that members of particular races are inherently criminal.

Structural Inequality

The concept of racial profiling is intricately linked to racial-ethnic stratification, a system that promotes the dominance of one racial or ethnic group over others. This ideology supports a hierarchical ranking where the race at the top enjoys power, prestige, and privilege. Such inequality in racial ranking leads to limited economic opportunities for communities lacking dominant racial status, thereby contributing to higher crime rates. This vicious cycle reinforces stereotypes and creates a societal perception of lower-ranking communities as inherently criminal (Marger, 2014).

Racial prejudice and discrimination stem from policies and ideologies that segregate races and ethnicities based on economic and social power disparities. This ranking system perpetuates inequality and institutional discrimination, embedding bias and negative stereotypes into organizational structures. Beliefs that segregate based on culture, economic status, and social lifestyle have significantly contributed to the racial discrimination disparities seen within communities and across races. Policies founded on such beliefs have entrenched racial disparities and normalized racist stereotypes, further exacerbating societal divisions.

Policy Implications

Just as affirmative action was introduced to address inequality, racial profiling was implemented to curb crime in areas deemed high-risk. However, both policies have inadvertently reinforced racial segregation and perpetuated stereotypes. While affirmative action sought to promote equality, it often led to accusations of reverse discrimination. Similarly, racial profiling has resulted in adverse consequences, perpetuating negative stereotypes and disproportionately impacting certain ethnic groups. The cycle of poverty in these communities, compounded by racial profiling, limits access to resources and opportunities, hindering social mobility and maintaining societal hierarchies (Marger, 2014).

Racial profiling, particularly in the United States, has reached alarming levels, damaging the nation's reputation. Risse and Zeckhauser (2004) argue that racial profiling is morally indefensible when it undermines public good elements like security. Rather than enhancing security, profiling victimizes target groups, subjecting them to excessive force, humiliation, and trauma through unwarranted searches, seizures, and harassment by law enforcement.

Social Consequences

Each race has contributed significantly to the United States' growth and development, with representatives in various fields making substantial impacts. Racial profiling, however, relies on assumptions rather than factual evidence, leading to manipulation and perpetuating double standards. This practice not only undermines law enforcement’s efforts to reduce crime but also provides a platform for favored races to commit crimes with impunity. It is crucial to recognize that criminal potential exists in all individuals, making racial profiling an unfounded and unjust practice.

The negative impact of racial profiling on social cohesion is concerning, particularly in an era of globalization and cultural diversity. It is imperative that individuals be judged on their merits rather than their race, especially given the United States' diverse racial composition. Despite the constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law, discrimination based on race, sex, and gender remains prevalent. Racial profiling against African Americans has been particularly pronounced, sparking the international Black Lives Matter movement.

This campaign highlights the excessive force and aggression used by police against African Americans, often resulting in unwarranted detentions, shootings, and killings. The rise of racial profiling has led to policies like "stop and frisk," which authorizes law enforcement to target individuals based on suspicion, disproportionately affecting minorities. Such policies have reinforced negative stereotypes and subjected profiled races to demoralizing treatment by fellow citizens. Lippert-Rasmussen (2016) argues that racial profiling is justified if it aims to reduce crime, but this reasoning lacks merit when the targeted race is treated disparately.

Ethical Considerations

The utilitarianism theory, which posits that an action is ethical if it benefits the majority, has been used to justify racial profiling. According to Rasmussen (2016) and Risse and Zeckhauser (2004), racial profiling by police is based on arrest statistics, targeting groups with high crime rates. However, this justification is flawed, as utilitarianism advocates for the majority's benefit, while racial profiling targets specific races.

Discrimination against minorities is a significant factor in racial profiling, manipulated to target certain groups perceived as threats. Instead of finding alternatives to racial profiling, many scholars have sought to justify this reprehensible practice. Government and leadership organizations have often ignored the issue, as evidenced by the lack of adequate responses to protests against police brutality. To combat racial profiling, victimized groups have formed organizations like Black Lives Matter to advocate for their rights and demand justice.

Recently, some progress has been made as agencies and states have begun implementing corrective measures to address racial profiling. New York, for example, has banned racial profiling policies and introduced body cameras to increase police accountability. As awareness of racial inequalities grows, there is hope that society can move beyond the devastating effects of racial profiling.

Did you like this example?

582

24