The Unchanging Nature of Junk Food: a Critical Analysis

David Freedman and Michael Moss explore the world of junk food in two intriguing essays that challenge conventional perspectives. The authors suggest that some food companies are endeavoring to make junk food healthier as a strategy to combat the escalating issue of obesity. They provide examples of these efforts, with McDonald's being the most notable. The fast-food giant has expressed intentions to reduce the fat, calories, and sugar content in their offerings to align with the notion of 'healthy food.' However, I hold a divergent perspective. I am firmly convinced that the fundamental nature of junk food is immutable, and no superficial changes can alter its essence.

The Profit-Driven Nature

Firstly, it's crucial to acknowledge the profit-driven motives of junk food companies. These entities, such as Chipotle, Wendy’s, and KFC, are part of a rapidly expanding industry, particularly in Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia. According to data from Millward Brown, the world's ten largest fast-food companies are collectively valued at an astonishing $240 billion. In the United States alone, there exist approximately 275,000 fast-food and fast-service restaurants, generating a staggering $225 billion in revenue. This immense financial landscape underscores the intense competition among these companies. Their business models heavily rely on enticing customers through taste, which is predominantly achieved by incorporating sugar, salt, fat, meat, and MSG into their offerings. Removing these elements would render junk food unpalatable, leading to a significant decline in sales and profitability. Consequently, I find myself at odds with Freedman's perspective.

The cost structures of these companies play a pivotal role in their reluctance to embrace healthier alternatives. The expenses incurred for seasoning and raw materials constitute a substantial portion of the final product's price. Conversely, healthier ingredients are significantly more expensive. The economic incentives for companies to continue using unhealthy materials are clear, as consumers are drawn to the addictive flavors and are willing to spend their money on these products. Removing these elements would result in a loss of consumer interest and, consequently, financial losses for the companies. This economic reality renders the prospect of producing healthy junk food implausible.

Economic Implications

Moreover, the notion that junk food serves as a cost-effective option for low-income individuals is a fallacy. Moss argues that the affordability of junk food is intended to make it accessible to the economically disadvantaged. However, this perspective is fundamentally flawed. For instance, at a Taco Bell in Logan Square, Chicago, a grilled corn pancake is priced at over $5, while a steak taco surpasses the cost of similar offerings at a Mexican restaurant. Despite regional price variations, the trend towards higher prices in the United States is undeniable. Since 2009, food prices have risen consistently, both in grocery stores and restaurants. However, the growth trajectories diverged, with restaurants facing unique challenges.

Dining out has become increasingly expensive, primarily due to rising labor and rental costs. While grocery stores benefit from lower agricultural and food commodity costs, restaurants do not experience these advantages. The fast-food industry's competitive landscape is fierce, with continuous price upgrades to maintain profit margins. Pentallect Food Service Consulting Inc. notes that fast-food menu prices have approached those of more upscale, farm-to-table establishments. This trend is evident in the narrowing price gap between fast-food and recreational chains like Habit Burger or Shake Shack Inc. The economic pressures on fast-food chains, such as the need to raise prices to accommodate wage increases, further contribute to the rising costs.

Despite the perception of junk food as a budget-friendly option, it ultimately proves to be financially burdensome. The nutritional deficiencies of junk food lead to frequent feelings of hunger, compelling individuals to purchase more. Over time, this expenditure surpasses that of healthier alternatives. Furthermore, the detrimental health consequences of excessive junk food consumption, including obesity and related ailments, result in substantial medical expenses. For low-income individuals, the financial strain of medical bills exacerbates their already precarious situation. Moss's argument, therefore, lacks merit and perpetuates a flawed understanding of the economic implications.

Health Impact and Nutritional Imbalances

The quick preparation of junk food is another factor contributing to its popularity. The use of copious amounts of oil, salt, sugar, and high heat results in dishes that are not only flavorful but also laden with unhealthy ingredients. While junk food offers convenience and efficiency, its adverse health effects are undeniable. The nutritional imbalance inherent in fast food, characterized by an overemphasis on meat, carbohydrates, and fat, coupled with a deficiency of vegetables and fruits, poses significant health risks.

Long-term consumption of fast food leads to nutritional imbalances, predisposing individuals to a range of diseases. The high energy content derived from fats and monosaccharides contributes to excessive calorie intake, which, if not managed, can result in elevated cholesterol levels and cardiovascular issues. A study conducted in Jackson, Mississippi, unveiled the disturbing reality of fast-food chicken nuggets. The findings revealed that these products contained not only chicken but also a substantial proportion of fat, blood vessels, nerves, and artificial ingredients. The implications of such findings are troubling, as they highlight the deceptive nature of fast-food offerings.

Chicken, often touted as a healthy protein source, becomes a health hazard when consumed in the form of fast-food nuggets. The excessive quantities of heat, salt, sugar, and fat present in these products contribute to childhood obesity and related health complications, including diabetes, hypertension, and arthritis. The deceptive marketing practices of fast-food companies, exemplified by McDonald's, further compound the issue. In a legal case involving obese adolescents against McDonald's, a federal judge in New York dismissed the claims, describing McNuggets as "science monsters" with ingredients unsuitable for home cooking.

Additionally, the high salt content prevalent in fast food poses significant health risks, including vascular and kidney damage. For individuals with busy lifestyles, such as employees and students, junk food offers a time-saving solution. Companies like KFC and McDonald's strategically market their products to cater to this demographic. However, if junk food were to lose its convenience factor, consumers would seek alternative options. This inherent link between junk food and fast food underscores its inability to transform into a healthy choice.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the dichotomy is clear: individuals must either relinquish their reliance on junk food or disregard the associated health issues. Freedman and Moss's arguments, while well-intentioned, fail to acknowledge the fundamental aspects that render junk food resistant to change. The profit-driven nature of the industry, the economic implications, and the quick preparation time collectively contribute to the enduring status quo of junk food. Despite efforts to rebrand and reformulate, the core characteristics of junk food remain unchanged. As consumers, we must recognize the limitations of these attempts and make informed choices regarding our dietary habits.

Did you like this example?

267

11