Gender and Sexuality in Sport
How it works
Contents
Introduction
The realms of gender and sexuality in sports have long been contentious, sparking debate and analysis over centuries. These discussions often revolve around the complex web of marginalization, involving numerous power systems and societal players. Traditionally, society has imposed specific gender and sexual stereotypes upon individuals, with expectations for men and women to adhere to predefined roles. When these societal norms are defied, individuals frequently encounter labeling and ostracism. Despite these enduring stereotypes, women and feminist movements have persistently challenged and redefined these norms, pushing for equality and representation.
Similarly, sexuality in sports has also undergone significant transformations. As early as the 1900s, athletes began cultivating highly sexualized public personas. During this era, sports headlines predominantly echoed heterosexual narratives until a pivotal shift occurred with the emergence of the first openly homosexual tennis player in the 1980s. This watershed moment marked the beginning of a broader acceptance and acknowledgment of diverse sexual orientations within sports.
This essay aims to explore perceived discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, particularly within competitive and recreational sports in the United States. The central research question asks: What are the challenges and prejudices that women and LGBT individuals face in the sports world, and what solutions can be implemented to foster a more inclusive and non-discriminatory environment?
Gender Ideology in Sport
The expectation that athletic competition transcends social discrepancies such as class, race, and ethnicity is a common belief in today's world. However, the reality is far more complex. While athletes are often valued for their performance, the separation of athletes based on sex and gender remains a contentious issue. Unlike other forms of classification, such as weight class in boxing or age in football, sex and gender segregation in sports have been subjects of heated debate. Understanding Sex and Gender
To delve deeper into this issue, it is crucial to distinguish between sex and gender. According to Diamond (2002), sex refers to the biological differences between males and females, encompassing primary characteristics like reproductive systems and secondary characteristics like height and muscularity. In contrast, gender is a socio-cultural construct associated with being male or female and is closely linked to gender identity, which reflects an individual's self-identification as masculine or feminine.
In sports, the separation between men and women is often justified by the principles of fair competition and equal participation. However, such classifications have sparked intense social, moral, and legal debates outside the sports arena (Shin, 2017). Despite significant progress in women's participation in sports over the decades, feminist activists continue to advocate for equal rights, challenging the notion that gender segregation is justified.
Coaching and Gender Inequality
An illustrative example of gender inequality in sports is the case of coaching. According to Knoppers (1992), coaching remains a male-dominated profession, with women significantly underrepresented. This discrepancy is primarily attributed to gender-differentiated work behavior, resulting in wage disparities between male and female coaches. In 1992, when this research was conducted, sex segregation in employment was not a focal point of interest, and women often occupied lower positions in organizational hierarchies. This positioning influenced their wages and work-related behavior, perpetuating their minority status in coaching roles.
Hegemonic Masculinity and Othering
The genetic characteristics of males, often perceived as more competitive and dominant, have sometimes been exaggerated to the point of forming concepts like 'hegemonic masculinity' and 'othering.' According to Connell (2005), hegemonic masculinity refers to behaviors that perpetuate gender inequality through male domination over females and minority groups. This concept gained prominence in research studies since the 1980s, aiming to transform male behavior and promote gender equality.
In the context of sport, these concepts have had tangible repercussions. A study by Matthew Ezzel in 2009 on women's rugby revealed that successful female athletes, unable to continue their sport in college, faced stigmatization and discrimination when turning to rugby. Their defensive othering mentality inadvertently reinforced heterosexist ideologies linked to dominant gender narratives.
Sexual Minorities in Sport
The experiences of sexual minorities in sports provide another layer of complexity to the issue of discrimination. Math & Seshadri (2013) define a sexual minority as a group whose sexual identity, orientation, or practices differ from societal norms, often including lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals (LGBT).
Challenges Faced by LGBT Athletes
Kokkonen's 2011 research highlights that LGBT individuals in sports still face discrimination and labeling as non-intelligent or abnormal. They often experience disrespectful behavior and social exclusion, with some athletes even accused of choosing their sport based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The response to these prejudices varies among minorities. Gays and lesbians tend to conceal their orientation in hostile environments, while transgender individuals face verbal abuse and restrictive participation rules in many sports leagues (Cunningham & Pickett, 2018).
Managerial Discrimination
From a managerial perspective, discrimination against LGBT individuals persists, with many facing lower pay and limited promotion opportunities compared to heterosexual counterparts. Despite some progress, sexual minorities in the United States continue to confront employment discrimination and lack federal protection from such biases.
LGBT Movements and Progress
Nevertheless, LGBT movements outside the sport have driven sociological change within it. Media coverage and increased visibility of LGBT athletes and coaches have paved the way for greater acceptance. Movements like 'The Equality Coaching Alliance' and initiatives such as 'Break the Silence' have provided platforms for LGBT individuals to share their experiences and foster inclusivity.
Inclusion and Exclusion in Sport
Despite significant strides towards inclusion, exclusion based on gender and sexuality remains an issue in sports. Fink (2015) notes that the sports industry is still plagued by sexism, with media coverage of women in sports lagging behind their male counterparts. The case of Serena Williams, the only woman among the top 100 highest-paid athletes in the world, underscores the financial disparities faced by female athletes (Saiki, 2018).
Inclusive Sports and Programs
However, not all sports are dominated by male-centric narratives. Equestrian sports, as De Haan, Sotiriadou & Henry (2016) suggest, offer an example of sex-integrated disciplines where discrimination is minimal. Furthermore, initiatives like the 'LGBT SportSafe Inclusion Program' aim to set new standards for inclusivity, providing training and protection policies for LGBT athletes and coaches.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the discourse on gender and sexuality in sports has evolved significantly over the years. While traditional stereotypes and discrimination persist, ongoing movements and initiatives continue to challenge and reshape these narratives. By fostering inclusivity and promoting equal opportunities, the sports world can transcend societal discrepancies and embrace diversity. Addressing these challenges requires a collective effort to dismantle prejudices, promote openness, and create an environment where all individuals, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, can thrive.
Gender and Sexuality in Sport. (2021, May 10). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/gender-and-sexuality-in-sport-in-21st-century/