Social Understanding of Racism

The complex and often contentious issue of racism continues to be a significant social and moral problem worldwide.

Introduction

While many definitions of racism emphasize the ideology that one race is superior to another, philosopher Jorge L. A. Garcia offers a distinct perspective that challenges conventional views. In his 1996 work, Garcia argues that understanding racism requires us to focus on the moral and political contexts that underpin racial attitudes and behaviors. This essay will explore Garcia's definition of racism, assess its implications on individual versus institutional racism, and consider objections raised by critics.

By comparing Garcia's ideas with other definitions, this essay aims to provide a more nuanced understanding of racism and its manifestations in society.

Core Definition of Racism

Garcia's (1996) definition of racism diverges from traditional views that center on racial superiority. Instead, he posits that racism primarily stems from individuals' ability to differentiate within their hearts based on racial classifications. Garcia introduces the term "White racists" to describe individuals who harbor hatred against those expressing love for people of color. These individuals, according to Garcia, are characterized by a lack of human empathy and act as obstacles to efforts aimed at dismantling segregation and promoting racial harmony.

Garcia's account aligns with various forms of intergroup animosity, such as anti-Semitism, which is fundamentally rooted in hatred against Jews. Similarly, racism parallels malice against other social groups, such as homophobia and xenophobia. Xenophobia, for instance, includes not only irrational fears about foreigners but also pure disdain and hatred toward them. In this context, Garcia asserts that racism is predominantly based on intolerant attitudes prevalent in society.

Individual and Institutional Racism

Garcia's framework allows for a dual understanding of racism, distinguishing between individual and institutional forms. He challenges the notion that institutions can inherently be racist due to their structure, arguing instead that racism stems from individual intentions, wishes, and desires. Although institutions may reflect racist practices, Garcia posits that these are often extensions of personal biases and prejudices.

He highlights that individual racism is rooted in immoral attitudes such as arrogance, greed, and contempt. These attitudes compromise moral values and can lead to the transfer of prejudice to institutional settings, thereby fostering institutional racism. Despite this, Garcia considers the individual level as a more significant explanatory tool, as it provides insights into the moral underpinnings of racist behaviors.

Examples in Context

Judith Lichtenberg provides an illustrative example that aligns with Garcia's perception of racism. She describes a scenario where white individuals avoid people of color due to perceived threats. Some might argue this behavior is not racist, as it is based on safety concerns. However, Garcia contends that such situations cannot be simplistically labeled as racist, as similar avoidance might occur with white individuals perceived as threats.

In contrast, Garcia would argue that a scenario involving a black teenager applying for a job and facing unjust bias from a white Human Resources Officer is a clearer example of racism. This situation exemplifies how personal and professional biases intertwine, leading to discriminatory outcomes. Garcia's perspective on morality emphasizes that such biases are rooted in ill will and hatred, which are central to his definition of racism.

Critiques and Responses

Despite Garcia's compelling arguments, his definition of racism has faced scrutiny from scholars such as Anthony Skillen and Anthony Flew. Skillen argues that racism possesses an institutional feature, suggesting that institutions can shape individual intentions. Flew, on the other hand, emphasizes the role of regulative practices in perpetuating racial discrimination within institutions.

Garcia acknowledges some points raised by his critics, agreeing that institutional operations can be racist and that the constitution of an institution can foster racism. However, he rejects the notion that undesirable effects alone can justify labeling an institution as racist. Instead, Garcia maintains that the root of racism lies in individual intentions and attitudes, which can then influence institutional practices.

Conclusion

Garcia's definition of racism offers a valuable perspective that emphasizes the moral and political contexts underlying racial attitudes and behaviors. By shifting the focus from racial superiority to individual intentions and desires, Garcia provides a nuanced understanding of racism that extends beyond traditional definitions. While his ideas have faced criticism, they underscore the importance of examining the moral dimensions of racism and its manifestations in both individual and institutional contexts. Ultimately, Garcia's work challenges us to confront the deep-seated prejudices within our hearts and strive for a more just and equitable society.

Did you like this example?

651

27