Frankenstein: Similarities between the Book and the Movie

Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” has captivated readers and audiences for over two centuries, and its adaptations into film have played a significant role in the story’s cultural legacy. When comparing these cinematic interpretations to the original novel, several differences and similarities emerge, revealing how filmmakers adapt literary sources for the screen. This essay explores these similarities, focusing on how key elements from Shelley’s novel are retained or altered in film adaptations.

Firstly, the core plot of Shelley’s “Frankenstein” remains largely intact in many film versions.

The story of Victor Frankenstein, a young scientist who creates a sentient being in an unorthodox scientific experiment, is a foundational element that most adaptations do not stray from. This plot is central to both the 1931 Universal film directed by James Whale and Kenneth Branagh’s 1994 film “Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Both films depict Victor’s obsession with conquering death, which leads to the creation of the creature, echoing the novel’s plot.

However, the character development and moral complexity of the creature, so vividly portrayed in the novel, often undergo significant changes in film adaptations. In Shelley’s narrative, the creature is a deeply complex character, capable of thoughtful reflection and profound emotional expression. He teaches himself to read and think critically, grappling with existential questions about his own nature and the cruelty of his rejection by society. The 1994 Branagh adaptation attempts to stay true to this aspect of the novel, presenting the creature as articulate and emotionally nuanced, which is more in line with Shelley’s original characterization than earlier film versions. In contrast, the 1931 Universal classic portrays the creature more as a mute, misunderstood monster, focusing on the horror aspects rather than the philosophical and ethical dilemmas he faces.

Another critical similarity between the book and many of its adaptations is the theme of humanity’s overreach and the ethical implications of playing God. Both the 1931 and 1994 films address these themes, though often the nuanced critique of Romantic and Enlightenment ideals present in the book is simplified to enhance the dramatic and horror elements of the story. The novel’s intricate debates about creator responsibility, the dangers of knowledge without conscience, and the societal rejection of the “other” are sometimes reduced to more straightforward narratives of horror and tragedy.

Moreover, the setting and period details in film adaptations often remain faithful to the novel’s early 19th-century context, though with varying degrees of historical accuracy and visual style. The 1994 film, in particular, invests heavily in period costumes and settings, which help to reinforce the Gothic tone of the original novel, unlike many other adaptations that opt for a more stylized or contemporary approach.

In conclusion, while film adaptations of “Frankenstein” vary in their fidelity to the source material, many strive to retain the novel’s core themes and plotlines. Differences in character portrayal and thematic emphasis often reflect the directors’ artistic visions and the cinematic needs to appeal to different audiences. Each adaptation, therefore, offers a unique interpretation of Shelley’s timeless novel, highlighting different facets of its rich narrative and themes. These adaptations underscore the enduring appeal of the story and its capacity to be reshaped in various cultural contexts while still preserving its original insights into human nature and morality.

Did you like this example?

234

12